Taperssection.com

Gear / Technical Help => Post-Processing, Computer / Streaming / Internet Devices & Related Activity => Topic started by: Corbin on January 08, 2015, 02:42:30 PM

Title: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: Corbin on January 08, 2015, 02:42:30 PM
Hey guys,

Taped my first show in 5 years a couple weekends ago (Grand Theft Bus). 
Remembereing the post-processing workflow was a pain.

I was about to upload it to the archive without disc numbers (ie. gtb2014-12-19t01) cause I thought very few people would still be burning these tunes to CDRs.  The archive/etreee naming standards still seem to suggest disc numbers:
http://wiki.etree.org/index.php?page=NamingStandards

Anyone know what I should do?
Thanks
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: hoppedup on January 08, 2015, 02:50:07 PM
It will be fine without disc numbers. I haven't upped a show with disc numbers in the filename since 2009.
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: stevetoney on January 08, 2015, 02:51:57 PM
You're right.  Discs are a thing of the past.  As a courtest to downloaders, I still upload my files in 16/44.1 along with my own standard 24/48 format files.  The smaller files generally get more downloads for whatever reason, but I don't necessarily think it's because people are burning CDRs.

But disc number is optional nowadays.  The naming standard you use is pretty standard nowadays, although alot of us put the gear we used in between the date and the track number.  For example, my last show starts with the first track...lotus2014-12-30.m934b.cmmt30.psp3.d100.16bit-t01 and some people will follow that up with the track title...lotus2014-12-30.m934b.cmmt30.psp3.d100.16bit-t01_umbilical_moonrise.
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: colinw on January 08, 2015, 02:55:08 PM
Hey guys,

Taped my first show in 5 years a couple weekends ago (Grand Theft Bus). 
Remembereing the post-processing workflow was a pain.

I was about to upload it to the archive without disc numbers (ie. gtb2014-12-19t01) cause I thought very few people would still be burning these tunes to CDRs.  The archive/etreee naming standards still seem to suggest disc numbers:
http://wiki.etree.org/index.php?page=NamingStandards

Anyone know what I should do?
Thanks

I don't use disc numbers at all.

Also, awesome news that you recorded the Bus and will be posting it. I assume it was something from the Christmas run? The Saint John show was a lot of fun, if a little messy.

Looking forward to hearing it.
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: Corbin on January 08, 2015, 05:07:57 PM
Thanks for the responses guys.

Hey Colin,
Yeah it was from the Xmas run...the Moncton show.  Should have it up tomorrow once I get a couple missing track names from Tim.

I'm not sure if we've met before...My wife and I have been fuckin around up north for a few years. 
I'm guessing we're the only NB tapers? 
If I see you running your rig at a show, I'll introduce myself.
Adam
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: F.O.Bean on January 08, 2015, 10:12:11 PM
I'm just glad that SOMEONE still uses the etree naming standards. I DL/Stream a TON of the recordings posted in the Kickdown just to listen to different sources, and youd be shocked at how many tapers DON'T use the etree naming standards. Drives me FN BONKERS :P is it really that hard to follow their standards? Not IMO!!! We should just tell new tapers THAT before anything else, whether they actually UL them to etree/LMA or not.

Sorry for the minor rant, but that shit drives me nuts! And I also haven't used disc numbers in my filenames in many years, with no ill effect on the LMA/etree ;)

16bit

turkuaz2014-12-18.mk41.vms02ib.m10.set1.t01_Set_Intro   etc is the way I do it.

And 24bit is

turkuaz2014-12-18.mk41.vms02ib.m10.2496.set1.t01_Set_Intro

Carry on lol 8)
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: macdaddy on February 10, 2015, 12:47:34 AM
I only use the mic name if there is more than one taper present  :-X  ;)
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: spyder9 on February 10, 2015, 11:24:54 AM
I stopped using "Disc #" a few years ago.  I use "Set #" now.  It's all about available hard drive space, as opposed to carrying spindles of cds......
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: carlbeck on February 11, 2015, 08:40:52 PM
Wow, I can't believe I never thought to put source info into the file name, at least which mics I ran  :facepalm:
I typically do folders on my desktop with source info in them but I've lost drives before with my source info & my hard disk back ups never had the full source info listed so having it in the file name would have helped. Thanks!
Title: Re: Does LMA still requires disc #s?
Post by: willndmb on March 29, 2015, 10:53:42 PM
I typically put disc number just because I like to listen in my car and so it's easy for me
Band2015-xx-xxs1d1t01
No set or disc if there are not two plus