Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD  (Read 7718 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mmadd29

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 581
  • Gender: Male
  • I've stopped drinking, but only while I'm asleep
Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« on: March 05, 2007, 10:19:02 AM »
I'm looking to improve open setup rig.  I'm currently using  Superlux mics > Church Audio ST-9100 preamp > JB3.  My next logical move is to get an AD.  I'm looking at the Denecke AD-20, and wondering how much of an improvement is that over the internal AD of the JB3.  When I say improvement I mean in noticeable listening. 

How many other people use the JB3 and the AD-20, what what has been your experience?

Thanks
Superlux CM-H8K > UA5 > iriver h120 > Wave Labs > EAC

Offline cgrooves

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 804
  • Gender: Male
  • Get On the Bus -Busman Audio
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2007, 11:03:44 AM »
I haven't run the JB3's internal AD, but I have run the h1xx series internal AD (which has been reported as the same).  I doubt that anyone here will tell you that the internal AD on the JB3 is better than the AD20.  Although I run my digi mod UA5 99% of the time, it is mainly due to the ease of an all in one box.  I really like my AD20 because it gives a nice warm sound, IMO.  Keep in mind that the AD20 is a pre / AD combo that has a minimum of 17db gain (verify this, but I'm 99% sure).  I think you would need to drop the ST-9100 out of the chain and maybe use it for your stealth rig.  I think the overall concensus would be that to get the most noticeable listening change out of the gear chain, it would involve changing the mic's.
AUDIO:
Open:  Busman Audio BSC1-(K1/K2/K3/K4) > Fostex FR-2LE (Busman T Mod) 
                       
Unopen:  AudioReality Omni Mics (Panasonic capsules)> AudioReality Battery Box (depending on SPL's) > iRiver H140 w/ Rockbox

VISUAL:
Canon 7D, Canon 50mm/1.8, Canon 85mm/1.8, Tamron 17-50mm/2.8, Tamron 70-200mm/2.8

Offline mmadd29

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 581
  • Gender: Male
  • I've stopped drinking, but only while I'm asleep
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2007, 11:06:06 AM »
I haven't run the JB3's internal AD, but I have run the h1xx series internal AD (which has been reported as the same).  I doubt that anyone here will tell you that the internal AD on the JB3 is better than the AD20.  Although I run my digi mod UA5 99% of the time, it is mainly due to the ease of an all in one box.  I really like my AD20 because it gives a nice warm sound, IMO.  Keep in mind that the AD20 is a pre / AD combo that has a minimum of 17db gain (verify this, but I'm 99% sure).  I think you would need to drop the ST-9100 out of the chain and maybe use it for your stealth rig.  I think the overall concensus would be that to get the most noticeable listening change out of the gear chain, it would involve changing the mic's.

I quite certain the same that nobody would recommend the JB3 over the AD-20, what I'm really trying to gague is how much of an improvement it is in playback.  You did answer the other question I was wondering, that the ST-9100 could be dropped from the chain   :)

Thanks +t
Superlux CM-H8K > UA5 > iriver h120 > Wave Labs > EAC

Offline cgrooves

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 804
  • Gender: Male
  • Get On the Bus -Busman Audio
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2007, 11:12:43 AM »
Back-atcha.

I think it would be a noticeable improvement (at least based on my ears) to go to the AD20.  I would almost think of it as a no-brainer if you could help fund the AD20 purchase by selling the ST-9100.  There seems to be a good demand for those pre's, and I've only heard good things about them.  They just appear to show up more in stealth rig chains, where the AD20 shows up in stealth & open rig chains.
AUDIO:
Open:  Busman Audio BSC1-(K1/K2/K3/K4) > Fostex FR-2LE (Busman T Mod) 
                       
Unopen:  AudioReality Omni Mics (Panasonic capsules)> AudioReality Battery Box (depending on SPL's) > iRiver H140 w/ Rockbox

VISUAL:
Canon 7D, Canon 50mm/1.8, Canon 85mm/1.8, Tamron 17-50mm/2.8, Tamron 70-200mm/2.8

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2007, 11:20:34 AM »
I'm looking to improve open setup rig.  I'm currently using  Superlux mics > Church Audio ST-9100 preamp > JB3.  My next logical move is to get an AD.  I'm looking at the Denecke AD-20, and wondering how much of an improvement is that over the internal AD of the JB3.  When I say improvement I mean in noticeable listening. 

How many other people use the JB3 and the AD-20, what what has been your experience?

Thanks

Your not using balanced mics with my preamp are you? Do you run a phantom adaptor after your mics then into my preamp? My preamp was never designed to drive a 150ohm low impedence microphone input how is it working for you?

for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline mmadd29

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 581
  • Gender: Male
  • I've stopped drinking, but only while I'm asleep
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2007, 12:49:58 PM »
I'm looking to improve open setup rig.  I'm currently using  Superlux mics > Church Audio ST-9100 preamp > JB3.  My next logical move is to get an AD.  I'm looking at the Denecke AD-20, and wondering how much of an improvement is that over the internal AD of the JB3.  When I say improvement I mean in noticeable listening. 

How many other people use the JB3 and the AD-20, what what has been your experience?

Thanks

Your not using balanced mics with my preamp are you? Do you run a phantom adaptor after your mics then into my preamp? My preamp was never designed to drive a 150ohm low impedence microphone input how is it working for you?



Chris,

I'm not using balanced mics...I think.  I do run phantom after the mics, to your preamp...Art II.....the preamp is great, it drives my input up nice and high.....never had a problem with distortion or anything....the pre has been great, never had a bad recording yet with it,  about 60 or so shows.
Superlux CM-H8K > UA5 > iriver h120 > Wave Labs > EAC

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2007, 01:03:42 PM »
I'm looking to improve open setup rig.  I'm currently using  Superlux mics > Church Audio ST-9100 preamp > JB3.  My next logical move is to get an AD.  I'm looking at the Denecke AD-20, and wondering how much of an improvement is that over the internal AD of the JB3.  When I say improvement I mean in noticeable listening. 

How many other people use the JB3 and the AD-20, what what has been your experience?

Thanks

Your not using balanced mics with my preamp are you? Do you run a phantom adaptor after your mics then into my preamp? My preamp was never designed to drive a 150ohm low impedence microphone input how is it working for you?



Chris,

I'm not using balanced mics...I think.  I do run phantom after the mics, to your preamp...Art II.....the preamp is great, it drives my input up nice and high.....never had a problem with distortion or anything....the pre has been great, never had a bad recording yet with it,  about 60 or so shows.

I am pretty sure that they are balanced what is the model number?
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline mmadd29

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 581
  • Gender: Male
  • I've stopped drinking, but only while I'm asleep
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2007, 01:10:15 PM »
I'm looking to improve open setup rig.  I'm currently using  Superlux mics > Church Audio ST-9100 preamp > JB3.  My next logical move is to get an AD.  I'm looking at the Denecke AD-20, and wondering how much of an improvement is that over the internal AD of the JB3.  When I say improvement I mean in noticeable listening. 

How many other people use the JB3 and the AD-20, what what has been your experience?

Thanks



Your not using balanced mics with my preamp are you? Do you run a phantom adaptor after your mics then into my preamp? My preamp was never designed to drive a 150ohm low impedence microphone input how is it working for you?



Chris,

I'm not using balanced mics...I think.  I do run phantom after the mics, to your preamp...Art II.....the preamp is great, it drives my input up nice and high.....never had a problem with distortion or anything....the pre has been great, never had a bad recording yet with it,  about 60 or so shows.

I am pretty sure that they are balanced what is the model number?


Superlux CM-H8K series
Superlux CM-H8K > UA5 > iriver h120 > Wave Labs > EAC

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2007, 01:35:20 PM »
I'm looking to improve open setup rig.  I'm currently using  Superlux mics > Church Audio ST-9100 preamp > JB3.  My next logical move is to get an AD.  I'm looking at the Denecke AD-20, and wondering how much of an improvement is that over the internal AD of the JB3.  When I say improvement I mean in noticeable listening. 

How many other people use the JB3 and the AD-20, what what has been your experience?

Thanks



Your not using balanced mics with my preamp are you? Do you run a phantom adaptor after your mics then into my preamp? My preamp was never designed to drive a 150ohm low impedence microphone input how is it working for you?



Chris,

I'm not using balanced mics...I think.  I do run phantom after the mics, to your preamp...Art II.....the preamp is great, it drives my input up nice and high.....never had a problem with distortion or anything....the pre has been great, never had a bad recording yet with it,  about 60 or so shows.

I am pretty sure that they are balanced what is the model number?


Superlux CM-H8K series

Ok for sure these mics are 100% not compatible with my preamp in any way what so ever. Even though your using a phantom adaptor its still low impedance balanced output connecting to a high impedance unbalanced input of my preamp.. It was never designed to do this.
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline mmadd29

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 581
  • Gender: Male
  • I've stopped drinking, but only while I'm asleep
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2007, 02:58:30 PM »
What kind of input is on an AD-20?
Superlux CM-H8K > UA5 > iriver h120 > Wave Labs > EAC

Offline cgrooves

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 804
  • Gender: Male
  • Get On the Bus -Busman Audio
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2007, 03:46:46 PM »
What kind of input is on an AD-20?

Taken from Core Sound's website:
"On the bottom of the AD-20 are the dual XLR balanced microphone inputs. We offer an optional cable to convert unbalanced 1/8" (3.5mm) stereo miniplugs (standard on our Core Sound microphones) to two XLRs."
AUDIO:
Open:  Busman Audio BSC1-(K1/K2/K3/K4) > Fostex FR-2LE (Busman T Mod) 
                       
Unopen:  AudioReality Omni Mics (Panasonic capsules)> AudioReality Battery Box (depending on SPL's) > iRiver H140 w/ Rockbox

VISUAL:
Canon 7D, Canon 50mm/1.8, Canon 85mm/1.8, Tamron 17-50mm/2.8, Tamron 70-200mm/2.8

Offline jeromejello

  • Team Florida - always brings the heat
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3514
  • Gender: Male
  • surly tapir
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2007, 11:05:06 PM »
something to keep in mind.  even though the ad-20 is considered a pre by many, the fact is that unless it is the modded version, it does not provide plug in power to the mics.

therefore you would need either a phantom power source (eg ps-2) or a battery box of the 2 or 3 wire variety.  your choice to power the mic will be based on what you mic requires.
open: mbho 603a (ka200n/ka500hn) > SD MP-2 > PCM-M10
stealth: AT853a (o/sc/c/h) > SD MP-2 > ihp120
misc: Earthworks SR77 | Shure VP88

bt & dime

Offline mmadd29

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 581
  • Gender: Male
  • I've stopped drinking, but only while I'm asleep
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2007, 09:29:00 AM »
something to keep in mind.  even though the ad-20 is considered a pre by many, the fact is that unless it is the modded version, it does not provide plug in power to the mics.

therefore you would need either a phantom power source (eg ps-2) or a battery box of the 2 or 3 wire variety.  your choice to power the mic will be based on what you mic requires.

Already have a few ART II phantom power boxes so I guess that would work.....something like:

Superlux > Art II > AD-20 > JB3
Superlux CM-H8K > UA5 > iriver h120 > Wave Labs > EAC

Offline twatts (pants are so over-rated...)

  • <://PHiSH//><
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9941
  • Gender: Male
  • Lego made a Mini-Fig of me!
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #13 on: March 06, 2007, 10:52:13 AM »
something to keep in mind.  even though the ad-20 is considered a pre by many, the fact is that unless it is the modded version, it does not provide plug in power to the mics.

therefore you would need either a phantom power source (eg ps-2) or a battery box of the 2 or 3 wire variety.  your choice to power the mic will be based on what you mic requires.

Already have a few ART II phantom power boxes so I guess that would work.....something like:

Superlux > Art II > AD-20 > JB3

I  saw where someone had issues with the ART IIs:

http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,79514.msg1057753.html#msg1057753

But you have the right idea.  You'll need something that powers your mics and provide output into the preamp part of the AD20. 

T
 

***Do you have PHISH, VIDA BLUE, JAZZ MANDOLIN PROJECT or any other Phish related DATs/Tapes/MDs that need to be transferred???  I can do them for you!!!***

I will return your DATs/Tapes/MDs.  I'll also provide Master FLAC files via DropBox.  PM me for details.

Sony PCM R500 > SPDIF > Tascam HD-P2
Nakamichi DR-3 > (Oade Advanced Concert Mod) Tascam HD-P2
Sony MDS-JE510 > Hosa ODL-276 > Tascam HD-P2

******

Offline cgrooves

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 804
  • Gender: Male
  • Get On the Bus -Busman Audio
Re: Denecke AD-20 .vs. internal JB3 AD
« Reply #14 on: March 06, 2007, 11:01:06 AM »
I  saw where someone had issues with the ART IIs:

http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,79514.msg1057753.html#msg1057753

But you have the right idea.  You'll need something that powers your mics and provide output into the preamp part of the AD20. 

T


I'm thinking the only 'issue' was that they didn't use good batteries.  FWIW, I have never had a problem with my ART II.  Typically would last several shows on a pair of alkalines.  It seems that mmadd29 has been using the ART boxes for some time now anyway. 

Just stopped back by to let mmadd29 know that there is an AD20 in the yard sale for an awesome price.  Cheaper than I've ever seen one go for: http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,78421.0.html
AUDIO:
Open:  Busman Audio BSC1-(K1/K2/K3/K4) > Fostex FR-2LE (Busman T Mod) 
                       
Unopen:  AudioReality Omni Mics (Panasonic capsules)> AudioReality Battery Box (depending on SPL's) > iRiver H140 w/ Rockbox

VISUAL:
Canon 7D, Canon 50mm/1.8, Canon 85mm/1.8, Tamron 17-50mm/2.8, Tamron 70-200mm/2.8

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF