Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R4 review  (Read 20660 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bhtoque

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
  • Gender: Male
  • So much music, so little time.
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #30 on: May 30, 2005, 08:52:17 PM »
You won't even be allowed to make an archive recording for the band????

That sucks.

JAson
MG 200/210/270
AKG c422>s42>Hydra silver interconnects
AKG 391/92/93>MK 90/3 actives
>AM Hyper-Conductors
Studio Projects LSD2>MiAGi II
>Edirol R-4 (Oade T Mod)

db.etree.org/bhtoque

Offline jkoch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 855
  • Gender: Male
  • groovy!
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #31 on: June 03, 2005, 04:12:35 AM »
sounds impressive....

few spelling errors for ya

Quote
For the taper folks:

recording quite acoustic music
quiet

Quote
General use:

I prefer the segmented metes vs. the R4s "bar"
meters

Quote
Since there have been coments by other users
comMents
Schoeps MK4s > active cables > NBox+ > Edirol R-09HR

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #32 on: June 03, 2005, 07:34:12 AM »
fixed.
thanks!

Offline boa

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
  • Gender: Male
  • crowesbase loves you
    • crowesbase:an.amorican.archive
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #33 on: June 06, 2005, 12:23:10 AM »
Could you elaborate, comment more on the meters?  :hmmm:

Here is a photo showing the metering: 48 - 24 - 12 - 6 - 3 - C (clip), a second with Stereox02 pairs at a good level and the last shows a clip on the master meter.

Microtech Gefell m22 >  Babynbox > Sony m10acm
Microtech Gefell mv200/m21 > Aerco mp2 > Roland r44ocm

Offline Massive Dynamic

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1421
  • Gender: Male
  • 20 years of the best in apocalyptic gothic metal
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #34 on: June 06, 2005, 10:52:38 AM »
I know the 40gb hard drive makes this ideal for festivals, but I wonder about heat issues.  Anyone got plans to run this at an outdoor summer festival?  The one I attend usually has temps of 90-100° with humidity to match.
Naiant X-X > SP-SPSB-1 > M10
Superlux S502 > Denecke PS-2 > Hosa MIT-435 > M10

Offline boa

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
  • Gender: Male
  • crowesbase loves you
    • crowesbase:an.amorican.archive
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #35 on: June 06, 2005, 01:31:26 PM »
I know the 40gb hard drive makes this ideal for festivals, but I wonder about heat issues.  Anyone got plans to run this at an outdoor summer festival?  The one I attend usually has temps of 90-100° with humidity to match.

I ran it outside yesterday here is StL, MO (90 degrees and god-awful humidity) for a couple of 75 minute sets and saw no issues.
Microtech Gefell m22 >  Babynbox > Sony m10acm
Microtech Gefell mv200/m21 > Aerco mp2 > Roland r44ocm

Offline joemango

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 153
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #36 on: June 07, 2005, 02:10:54 PM »
OK... a question about the sensitivity issue...  can I still run Phantom 48v if the XLR inputs are set to line level?  I'm thinking of selling my Wmod ua-5 and JB3 to raise funds for one of these bitches, and I'd prefer to not run an external pre.

I'm prolly going to buy one from Oade so I can send it back and get it modded when Doug figgers it out, but I'd like to use it right out of the box.

Offline joemango

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 153
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #37 on: June 07, 2005, 02:25:06 PM »
cool thanks.  I guess that locks it in for me.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #38 on: June 07, 2005, 03:42:39 PM »
thats the only way i've been able to run it.
MIC in is too sensitive, and it will distort.  you have to run LINE in, which is just a switch per pair.  Its a 28db pad I believe.

Offline kgreener

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1448
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #39 on: June 07, 2005, 04:47:21 PM »
thats the only way i've been able to run it.
MIC in is too sensitive, and it will distort.  you have to run LINE in, which is just a switch per pair.  Its a 28db pad I believe.

might be a dumb question, but do you lose any quality or detail in your recording when a pad like this is running?  is the pad strictly for SPL's?  and what advantage does mic-in have over line-in, if any?

thanks.

Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #40 on: June 08, 2005, 06:22:18 AM »
Here is a photo showing the metering: 48 - 24 - 12 - 6 - 3 - C (clip), a second with Stereox02 pairs at a good level and the last shows a clip on the master meter.

It's too bad they couldn't make the LCD panel just a tad bigger. They really had to cram stuff into the current screen design.

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #41 on: June 08, 2005, 08:07:49 AM »
this box is not built with concert recording in mind.  That is why the mic input is so sensitive.  It was intended to record quiet sources...not rock concerts.

do you loose any detail?
I dont know.  Can't test it because you can't run mic in at a concert.  It is what it is.  And it sounds good line in.  the pad is attenuation.  Its to deal with hot signals.  MIC in is a very hot signal...especialy when the mics are recording a loud environment that the preamp can't handle.  Which is the case with the R4 as well as the Fostex FR2.
It doesn't mean you can't compensate w/the gain knobs...which will bring the levels up to where you need them when running LINE in.

the LCD panel is fine, imo.  plenty of info and easy to read.  I dont find it cramped or confusing. YMMV



Offline kgreener

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1448
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #42 on: June 08, 2005, 08:22:39 AM »
this box is not built with concert recording in mind.  That is why the mic input is so sensitive.  It was intended to record quiet sources...not rock concerts. do you loose any detail? I dont know.  Can't test it because you can't run mic in at a concert.  It is what it is.  And it sounds good line in.  the pad is attenuation.  Its to deal with hot signals.  MIC in is a very hot signal...especialy when the mics are recording a loud environment that the preamp can't handle.  Which is the case with the R4 as well as the Fostex FR2. It doesn't mean you can't compensate w/the gain knobs...which will bring the levels up to where you need them when running LINE in. the LCD panel is fine, imo.  plenty of info and easy to read.  I dont find it cramped or confusing. YMMV

thanks Nick...+T

Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #43 on: June 08, 2005, 10:30:39 AM »
the LCD panel is fine, imo.  plenty of info and easy to read.  I dont find it cramped or confusing. YMMV

I think this is because we've all grown accustomed to reading cell phones! As a technical communicator, I'm constantly appalled by the human interface placed on electronic devices. But, that's my opinion, and I'll have to admit I've been spoiled by the large color screen on the DEVA.

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #44 on: June 08, 2005, 02:25:59 PM »
well shit...
I would be to!
:)

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF