Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?  (Read 2931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline poorlyconditioned

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1958
  • I'm a tapir!
AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?
« on: February 14, 2005, 12:47:41 AM »
Has anyone looked inside the AT853Rx phantom power adapters?  If so, is there a transformer inside?  I just looked at the docs for the SM-4 adapters and they do have a transformer.  I'm assuming this is not so good, at least with low end brands like Samson.

By the way, I'm currently running a pair of AT853 with battery power (9V battery with a *proper* 3 wire circuit) and they work great.  So good, that I bought a second set with the phantom adapters.  I plan to use the batt. power ones for stealth and the phantom ones for open taping.  I haven't got them yet though.  When I get them I'll certainly open them up for a look...

  Richard
Mics: Sennheiser MKE2002 (dummy head), Studio Projects C4, AT825 (unmodded), AT822 franken mic (x2), AT853(hc,c,sc,o), Senn. MKE2, Senn MKE40, Shure MX183/5, CA Cards, homebrew Panasonic and Transsound capsules.
Pre/ADC: Presonus Firepod & Firebox, DMIC20(x2), UA5(poorly-modded, AD8620+AD8512opamps), VX440
Recorders: Edirol R4, R09, IBM X24 laptop, NJB3(x2), HiMD(x2), MD(1).
** This individual has moved to user "illconditioned" **

Offline leegeddy

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
  • Gender: Male
Re: AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2005, 01:38:08 AM »
Has anyone looked inside the AT853Rx phantom power adapters?  If so, is there a transformer inside?  I just looked at the docs for the SM-4 adapters and they do have a transformer.  I'm assuming this is not so good, at least with low end brands like Samson.

By the way, I'm currently running a pair of AT853 with battery power (9V battery with a *proper* 3 wire circuit) and they work great.  So good, that I bought a second set with the phantom adapters.  I plan to use the batt. power ones for stealth and the phantom ones for open taping.  I haven't got them yet though.  When I get them I'll certainly open them up for a look...

  Richard


yes. there is a tranformer inside the AT853X series adaptors.

>>9V battery with a *proper* 3 wire circuit

is there an improper way?

marc
"I'm a taper, he's a taper. Wouldn't you like to be a taper too?"
"Mics? What mics? This is my hat."

Offline poorlyconditioned

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1958
  • I'm a tapir!
Re: AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2005, 04:46:00 PM »
Has anyone looked inside the AT853Rx phantom power adapters?  If so, is there a transformer inside?  I just looked at the docs for the SM-4 adapters and they do have a transformer.  I'm assuming this is not so good, at least with low end brands like Samson.

By the way, I'm currently running a pair of AT853 with battery power (9V battery with a *proper* 3 wire circuit) and they work great.  So good, that I bought a second set with the phantom adapters.  I plan to use the batt. power ones for stealth and the phantom ones for open taping.  I haven't got them yet though.  When I get them I'll certainly open them up for a look...

  Richard


yes. there is a tranformer inside the AT853X series adaptors.

>>9V battery with a *proper* 3 wire circuit

is there an improper way?

marc


I guess 3-wire is the proper way.  I've just seen a lot of 2-wire stuff, and there is no excuse for that!

Anyway, what is the opinion on these transformers.  We should avoid them if possible, right?  I know the people over at micbuilders (Yahoo group) have schematics for transformerless phantom power circuits.  So, my hunch is we should run battery power for short runs (eg., stealth from your hat to your pocket) and phantom power, witthout transformers, for longer runs.

Comments?

  Richard
Mics: Sennheiser MKE2002 (dummy head), Studio Projects C4, AT825 (unmodded), AT822 franken mic (x2), AT853(hc,c,sc,o), Senn. MKE2, Senn MKE40, Shure MX183/5, CA Cards, homebrew Panasonic and Transsound capsules.
Pre/ADC: Presonus Firepod & Firebox, DMIC20(x2), UA5(poorly-modded, AD8620+AD8512opamps), VX440
Recorders: Edirol R4, R09, IBM X24 laptop, NJB3(x2), HiMD(x2), MD(1).
** This individual has moved to user "illconditioned" **

Offline jk labs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 191
  • Gender: Male
  • Straight wire!
    • Mics, pre and ADC...
Re: AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2005, 05:26:04 PM »
Has anyone looked inside the AT853Rx phantom power adapters?  If so, is there a transformer inside?  I just looked at the docs for the SM-4 adapters and they do have a transformer.  I'm assuming this is not so good, at least with low end brands like Samson.

By the way, I'm currently running a pair of AT853 with battery power (9V battery with a *proper* 3 wire circuit) and they work great.  So good, that I bought a second set with the phantom adapters.  I plan to use the batt. power ones for stealth and the phantom ones for open taping.  I haven't got them yet though.  When I get them I'll certainly open them up for a look...

  Richard


yes. there is a tranformer inside the AT853X series adaptors.

>>9V battery with a *proper* 3 wire circuit

is there an improper way?

marc


I guess 3-wire is the proper way.  I've just seen a lot of 2-wire stuff, and there is no excuse for that!

Anyway, what is the opinion on these transformers.  We should avoid them if possible, right?  I know the people over at micbuilders (Yahoo group) have schematics for transformerless phantom power circuits.  So, my hunch is we should run battery power for short runs (eg., stealth from your hat to your pocket) and phantom power, witthout transformers, for longer runs.

Comments?

  Richard



No comment :-)

But I do have a trick question:
why did Samson opt for an impossibly cumbersome $4 transformer requiring lots of manual labor both in mounting and final assembly
when they could have opted for a nice small machinemountable solution using only 50 cents worth of parts?

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re: AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2005, 01:04:17 AM »
damn I hate those trick questions
It feels like I'm in school.

hmmm....
Impedance can be set thru components right?
A noise thing? - it's balanced and 3 wired.
Is there some voltage step up through the transformer?  Or is this where they're creating the balanced source?
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline cgrooves

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 804
  • Gender: Male
  • Get On the Bus -Busman Audio
Re: AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2005, 10:33:33 AM »
Not talking SP mics here:
If you were to run 48v phantom power directly to an AT853 without going through one of the AT power modules (supplied with the AT mics) wouldn't it fry the mic?

As for the SP mics:  Does the Samson device that comes with their AT853 based mics act like a power module, or a low to hi Z transformer?

BTW, I have to transformers on my AT's in order to get good levels going line-in on my m1, whether running phantom or just from the AA batteries inside the AT power modules.
AUDIO:
Open:  Busman Audio BSC1-(K1/K2/K3/K4) > Fostex FR-2LE (Busman T Mod) 
                       
Unopen:  AudioReality Omni Mics (Panasonic capsules)> AudioReality Battery Box (depending on SPL's) > iRiver H140 w/ Rockbox

VISUAL:
Canon 7D, Canon 50mm/1.8, Canon 85mm/1.8, Tamron 17-50mm/2.8, Tamron 70-200mm/2.8

Offline poorlyconditioned

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1958
  • I'm a tapir!
Re: AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2005, 05:58:01 PM »
Not talking SP mics here:
If you were to run 48v phantom power directly to an AT853 without going through one of the AT power modules (supplied with the AT mics) wouldn't it fry the mic?

As for the SP mics:  Does the Samson device that comes with their AT853 based mics act like a power module, or a low to hi Z transformer?

BTW, I have to transformers on my AT's in order to get good levels going line-in on my m1, whether running phantom or just from the AA batteries inside the AT power modules.


The AT and the Samson are both "phantom power modules", to power the mics (approx 9V I think) and "impedance balancers" to convert the mic signal from an unbalanced to a balanced signal that can go on long cables.  Neither have any gain.  You can get gain from a preamp, or from transformers.  Or from putting the mics in front of very loud sources I guess.

What I was suggesting is using a transformerless phantom power circuit instead of the AT/Samson ones.  Actually I trust AT to provide a good one, but I'm not sure how good the Samson one would be.  I would certainly check before inserting it in between and AT mic and any decent preamp though.

  Richard
Mics: Sennheiser MKE2002 (dummy head), Studio Projects C4, AT825 (unmodded), AT822 franken mic (x2), AT853(hc,c,sc,o), Senn. MKE2, Senn MKE40, Shure MX183/5, CA Cards, homebrew Panasonic and Transsound capsules.
Pre/ADC: Presonus Firepod & Firebox, DMIC20(x2), UA5(poorly-modded, AD8620+AD8512opamps), VX440
Recorders: Edirol R4, R09, IBM X24 laptop, NJB3(x2), HiMD(x2), MD(1).
** This individual has moved to user "illconditioned" **

Offline §†∑∫åµÞ≥¥

  • You can call me Steve.
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7105
  • Gender: Male
Re: AT853Rx phantom power circuit. Transformers inside?
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2005, 08:55:25 PM »
Has anyone compared the Samson unit's to the AT's? I'm thinking about making this change to my SP AT933's but am wondering the difference between the two brands other than the Samson's being 1/3 the price. Thanks.
"Absurdity is the only reality." - FZ

LMA recordings
www.nutritionbulk.com

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF