Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012  (Read 3803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline aberg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
  • Team Canada
Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« on: November 09, 2004, 06:20:00 PM »
Myself and I friend of mine recently taped a local band with our mics placed in the exact same location and orientation. For those of you looking for great entry level mics, this is a good comparison to look at. They both produced relatively similar sounds, while the Superlux mics (mine) were a fraction of the price. Take a listen and decide for yourself and post comments here. Cheers.

Superlux source: http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=19635

Oktava source: http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=19633

Offline Swampy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12020
  • Gender: Male
  • You Worthless Swampy Fool
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2004, 06:26:35 PM »
What were they running into?

Offline ChrisV

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1371
  • Gender: Male
  • Proud member of team 'Lux!
    • My Taping Webpage
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2004, 06:27:16 PM »
I would hope the 'Luxs running into a UA-5 should smoke that ;p
http://taping.4t.com
http://db.etree.org/CV
Superlux CM-H8K/C/H/O -> digimod UA-5 -> JB3

Offline aberg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
  • Team Canada
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2004, 06:29:03 PM »
The superluxes were running into a UA-5 and the Oktava's into a Behringer mixer...

Offline Ed.

  • your popsicle's melting
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
  • Gender: Male
  • FJ Baby!
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2004, 02:42:11 AM »
i never listened to it cuz i don't have speakers hooked up at the second, but i'd put money on the luxes.


Because nothing says "I have lots of money and am sort of confused as to how to spend it" like Bose.

Offline King Crimson

  • Deez Nutz
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2004, 03:09:00 AM »
i never listened to it cuz i don't have speakers hooked up at the second, but i'd put money on the luxes.

as will I
I'll have a bloody mary, a steak sandwich and...a steak sandwhich.

Offline King Crimson

  • Deez Nutz
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2004, 03:09:32 AM »
i never listened to it cuz i don't have speakers hooked up at the second, but i'd put money on the luxes.

as will I
I'll have a bloody mary, a steak sandwich and...a steak sandwhich.

Offline pfife

  • Emperor of Ticketucky
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12354
  • I love/hate tickets.
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2004, 07:54:37 AM »
DOUBLE POST!!!  >:( ;)

Yeah, I'd put $$$ on the luxs as well, but the comparison would be a bit better if they had the same preamp as well.

I'd also take the UA-5 over the Behringer mixer any day of the week.

What were you taping with?  Were you using the UA-5 to do the analog -> digital conversion?

Cheers-
~Andrew


« Last Edit: November 11, 2004, 07:56:23 AM by pfife »
Tickets are dead to me.  Except the ones I have, don't have, and lost.  Not to mention the ones you have, don't have, and lost.   And the ones that other dude has, doesn't have, and lost.  Let me know if you need some tickets, I'm happy to oblige. 

Tickets >>>>>>>> Oxygen

urobouros

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2004, 11:10:54 AM »
I just got a set of the SMK-H8K's and can't wait to try 'em!

Offline aberg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
  • Team Canada
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2004, 01:23:29 PM »
Yeah, the UA-5 was outputting digital to my jb3... as per normal setup. ;)

Offline SparkE!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 773
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #10 on: November 15, 2004, 05:43:43 PM »
So, does anyone here know what's inside a SMK-H8K/C?  Is it just a diaphragm?  Is there an amp?  Does each mic have its own internal voltage regulator?  Do they require phantom 48V?  If you use less voltage, does it just reduce the mic sensitivity or does it affect the max SPL?  How is the differential mic signal formed?  Is it done by internal transformer, by connecting directly to the capsule or is there an amp with a differential output?

I'm trying to figure out what a minimum battery operated rig would be for using these mics.  Any hints would be welcome.
How'm I supposed to read your lips when you're talkin' out your ass? - Lern Tilton

Ignorance in audio is exceeded only by our collective willingness to embrace and foster it. -  Srajan Ebaen

Offline jkoch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 855
  • Gender: Male
  • groovy!
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2004, 02:41:13 AM »
the luxes should be more forgiving than the oktavas as well.
Schoeps MK4s > active cables > NBox+ > Edirol R-09HR

Offline Ed.

  • your popsicle's melting
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
  • Gender: Male
  • FJ Baby!
Re: Battle: Superlux SMK-H8K/C vs. Oktava MC-012
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2004, 07:15:30 AM »
So, does anyone here know what's inside a SMK-H8K/C?  Is it just a diaphragm?  Is there an amp?  Does each mic have its own internal voltage regulator?  Do they require phantom 48V?  If you use less voltage, does it just reduce the mic sensitivity or does it affect the max SPL?  How is the differential mic signal formed?  Is it done by internal transformer, by connecting directly to the capsule or is there an amp with a differential output?

I'm trying to figure out what a minimum battery operated rig would be for using these mics.  Any hints would be welcome.

they need phantom 48v.  i ran one 9v to the ua5 that powered these and never once ran out of power.  *shrug* that probably didn't help much.


Because nothing says "I have lots of money and am sort of confused as to how to spend it" like Bose.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 37 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF