Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Hypers NOS  (Read 5730 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Charlies

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 844
Hypers NOS
« on: August 11, 2005, 05:24:47 PM »
From the usual ots spots in smaller to medium-sized clubs (e.g., 930 Club) I've been not too impressed lately with the stereo spread/image running hypers DINa or DIN, so last night I ran ck63s in the Kwon NOS bar at Ramshead Live in Balt for Ratbob (awesome btw). I really dig the image and there's no hole-in-the-middle. I guess the hole-in-the-middle is an issue when you're too close (like on stage), but diminshes as you back away. I'm going to have to re-consider the NOS/hyper hole-in-the-middle myth. Thoughts? -Charlies
AKG ck61/2/3->JK Labs actives and DVC V20->722
M148, Minime, Mod SBM-1, M1

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2005, 05:32:41 PM »
i run hypers really wide.....about 25-28cm (depending upon microphones) for a local venue here in st. louis that is a medium size theatre.  sometimes i think i'm the only one that thinks this "hole in the middle" is a just taper scare tactic ;)  i guess now i know i'm not alone 8)

i've ran cardioids split 8 feet with no hole in the middle. 

i find myself running varied configs most of the time.  i'll rarely ever bust out pure ortf, din, dina, etc.  It's probably why i'll never get actives and kwon bars for my schoeps.

you did what all recordists should.  judge the sound and adjust from there.  rock on!

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2005, 05:46:20 PM »
actives and the bar are sooooo much easier though...

but in general yeah, the configs are just a nice starting point
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2005, 05:48:45 PM »
for that kind of money for new active cables.......it isn't that much easier ;)

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2005, 06:57:01 PM »
i dont even like sub cards  NOS.  that images like shit, imo

Offline Charlies

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 844
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2005, 08:20:34 PM »
i dont even like sub cards  NOS.  that images like shit, imo

Yeah Nick, I think it is blanket statements like this, with no context, that people latch onto and start to take as gospel...and I think that it creates misperceptions...  like "FOB sounds better than anything else." Shouldn't it be "Sub cards NOS image like shit from the 20th row of boomy hockey arena built in the 70s"?

In fact, what are the "absolute" statements that apply across-the-board? For example, is the following statement gospel: "LDs don't perform as well as SDs from a distance"?

-Charlies
AKG ck61/2/3->JK Labs actives and DVC V20->722
M148, Minime, Mod SBM-1, M1

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2005, 08:52:45 PM »
yeah Charlies...
note the  "imo" that should set aside blanket statements from personal opinions....

but thats the way I see it.  I'm just not a fan of it myself.   I've been right on top of bands and run NOS and still dont like it.

"absolute" blanket statements..
- SD mics are better for concert taping than LD.  but YMMV
- LD mics sound better coincident than near coincident, but again..YMMV.


Offline SonicSound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1569
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2005, 11:06:15 PM »
I am not going to step into this one :yikes:
SD: Schoeps  M222/NT222's & CMC6's - MK 41V's, 21's, 5's, 8's
LD: Microtech Gefell UM900's, Shure KSM44's
V3, 744t

Offline Charlies

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 844
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2005, 11:08:24 PM »
yeah Charlies...
note the  "imo" that should set aside blanket statements from personal opinions....

but thats the way I see it.  I'm just not a fan of it myself.   I've been right on top of bands and run NOS and still dont like it.

"absolute" blanket statements..
- SD mics are better for concert taping than LD.  but YMMV
- LD mics sound better coincident than near coincident, but again..YMMV.



Cool...
AKG ck61/2/3->JK Labs actives and DVC V20->722
M148, Minime, Mod SBM-1, M1

Offline eric.B

  • to the side qualified
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2796
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2005, 11:17:32 PM »
i dont even like sub cards  NOS.  that images like shit, imo

Yeah Nick, I think it is blanket statements like this, with no context, that people latch onto and start to take as gospel...and I think that it creates misperceptions... like "FOB sounds better than anything else." Shouldn't it be "Sub cards NOS image like shit from the 20th row of boomy hockey arena built in the 70s"?

In fact, what are the "absolute" statements that apply across-the-board? For example, is the following statement gospel: "LDs don't perform as well as SDs from a distance"?

-Charlies

I have found that LD's sound better in better sounding venues.. like a proportional curve imo..  the better the venue sounds the better a LD will sound compared to a SD..  I think this is mostly due to the off axis coloration of LD's, whereas the acoustics of the venue, if wretched, will be exagerated in a LD recording(even hypers)..  ex.   boomy + LD's(without rolloff) = extra boomy   edit:  Dont get me wrong, I do like the sound of lots of SD mics..  schoeps, neumann, josephson, earthworks MG et al.   It's just that, in comparison to an LD, all SD's have what I think is a tiny tiny tinny sound to them..  Like a less "open" sound.. constrained..     hmm  thats the best description I can muster

I also tend to think LD's sound great onstage and close, especially when running larger patterns, in any configuation.  I am partial to the soundstaging and separation that M/S creates, however all of the NOS or spread omni tapes I have made with LD's sound great.

of course and as allways..   ymmv

Happy Taping!



 
« Last Edit: August 11, 2005, 11:23:25 PM by webericb »
We have a system that increasingly taxes work and subsidizes nonwork.  ~Milton Friedman

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2005, 01:13:23 AM »
looking forward to getting back into the ld game myself...
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline BC

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Gender: Male
  • Bongo Bongo
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2005, 02:05:19 AM »

In fact, what are the "absolute" statements that apply across-the-board?
-Charlies



B&K's rock the house.

Schoeps are muddy sounding.

 ;)    ;D     ;)    :-*
In: DPA4022>V3>Microtracker/D8

Out: Morrison ELAD>Adcom GFA555mkII>Martin Logan Aerius i

Offline shaggy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1928
    • dwonk
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2005, 02:56:51 AM »
I disagree, the DPA402X need to be in the sweet spot or they sound like mud.  I think the Schoeps are more forgiving, AKGs even more forgiving.

FWIW, I ran the Nak CM300 in NOS for a long time....till I discovered ORTF and DIN, thos e configs imaged much better and took the most of the mud out of the sound.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2005, 07:21:31 AM »
i've run LD mics a lot in my short taping carreer.  Love them...when things are right.  the SD mics just work better for my ears though.  they sound good up front, far away and everywhere in between. 

LD mics have that fat soundstage ...and typicaly come w/the options of multiple patterns...which is nice.

you just cant beat the 414 for a LD concert taping mic.  They have all the good things you want in a pair of guns..including price.

Ray76

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hypers NOS
« Reply #14 on: August 12, 2005, 07:34:58 AM »
i've run LD mics a lot in my short taping carreer.  Love them...when things are right.  the SD mics just work better for my ears though.  they sound good up front, far away and everywhere in between. 

LD mics have that fat soundstage ...and typicaly come w/the options of multiple patterns...which is nice.

you just cant beat the 414 for a LD concert taping mic.  They have all the good things you want in a pair of guns..including price.


AT4050s sound great too, and are cheaper. card, omni, fig 8.
i use them a lot. I havent heard of many folks using them to tape with, i guess cuz noone ever thought to use them with all the other LDs around. i have some shows if someone wants.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2005, 07:38:37 AM by BigRay »

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF