Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: M/S Recording Question  (Read 1664 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BWolf

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5965
  • Gender: Male
  • Always on the prowl...
    • Etree Trading List
M/S Recording Question
« on: May 03, 2006, 05:14:30 PM »
So how do you set your levels?  I ran M/S for the first time and I just did a little improv.  I am going to do the M/S decoding in post.

So should you set the Mid so that its what level you like and then set the side to the same level (this makes the side have a lot lower on the levels on the V3).  Or should I set them so they both have the same levels on the V3 (this way the gain on the side is higher then the mid).

So will it matter how hot I run each chanel?  What is the proper way to do this?
"The best jazz is funky, and the best funk is jazzy" -SMOOTH
------------------------------------------------------
Neumann AK20/AK40s > LC3 > KM100 > Lunatec V3 (MS mod) > SD 722 or Microtrack 24/96  (Hi-Ho Silver Custom Interconnects)
------------------------------------------------------

Offline anhisr

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
Re: M/S Recording Question
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2006, 05:58:07 PM »
I ran my V3 so that the levels on the meters were equal.
Audio: Neumann KM 100> 20, 30, 40, 43 or 50 > V3 > MT II (love that M/S)
Still Camera Body: Canon D5 Mark II
Canon Lenses:  16-35mm f2.8L II USM; 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM; 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Video Canon HF R30

archive  http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/anhisr

Offline krebsy

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 552
Re: M/S Recording Question
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2006, 06:06:21 PM »
I usually just set my levels as I normally would, that is, as high as I feel comfortable without clipping.  Doing this will usually mean adding more gain to the S channel than the M.  You will get summing when you decode, so the L/R levels will be higher than the M/S was.  My theory was just to get max resolution at the time of recording, then set my final L/R levels when doing the decoding.
"Two wrongs don't make a right. Three rights make a left."

Offline BWolf

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5965
  • Gender: Male
  • Always on the prowl...
    • Etree Trading List
Re: M/S Recording Question
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2006, 06:50:52 PM »
So I went with the first option (having the gain set the same and the levels different).  Should I normalize the S before doing the decoding into L and R?  Or should I just do the decode for the L and R and then normalize if need be?
"The best jazz is funky, and the best funk is jazzy" -SMOOTH
------------------------------------------------------
Neumann AK20/AK40s > LC3 > KM100 > Lunatec V3 (MS mod) > SD 722 or Microtrack 24/96  (Hi-Ho Silver Custom Interconnects)
------------------------------------------------------

Offline krebsy

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 552
Re: M/S Recording Question
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2006, 08:41:35 AM »
I would probably do the matrix first, then normalize if needed.  With the summing during M/S > L/R you may not need to normalize at all after you mix.
"Two wrongs don't make a right. Three rights make a left."

Offline Dr.FOB

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
  • USM69i
Re: M/S Recording Question
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2006, 11:27:33 AM »
I find after many MS outings that setting at the same gain yields the best results.
But, this is based on using MS only in an FOB setting where the side levels at peak could overload if the gain was set higher.
Check out the 5/3/06 Mule show.  It's got amazing separation.
YMMV
Neumann gear slut

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 31 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF