Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: schoeps and stealthing  (Read 7721 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2006, 07:43:01 AM »
I'm still curious to see someone legitimately stealth the HDP2, that thing is big....

I have been stealthing a full skm140 kit > ua5 > iriver w/o any trouble, and i'm about to change that stealthing w/a mini MP.

Offline schoepsnbox

  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 439
  • Gender: Male
  • Nbox...........Zero's and One's
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2006, 01:14:23 AM »
MKx>Nbox>R9.......Pimp my rig :o ;) ;D

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #17 on: October 15, 2006, 06:26:37 PM »
I dealt with Parker at SonicSense who was extemely helpful and knowledgeable. She gave me tips on stealthing-she's been taping and stealthing for 30 years.

what?
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline brianp

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
  • Gender: Male
    • Shows I've taped on LMA
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #18 on: October 16, 2006, 06:12:35 PM »
Good luck "stealthing" the vms 5u and hd-p2, neither of those are very small. I've owned both and no way you can crotch those, maybe one of them, but not both. The only thing stealthy about that rig is the mk4>kcy combo. Congrats though, that will be a nice low-profile rig.

trade the vms in for a Lemosax and get an M1, and that will be a little more stealthable.
SBD>MR>C>D>CD>EAC>SHN

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #19 on: October 16, 2006, 08:10:14 PM »
M1 ?
what the hell kind of recomendation is that?
might as well just try to carve the music into stone.
(joking...., DAT is a tad passe', no? )

Lemosax > R-09, and now you're talking

Offline brianp

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
  • Gender: Male
    • Shows I've taped on LMA
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #20 on: October 16, 2006, 08:21:37 PM »
yeah, I guess that's kinda dated at this point, but it works.  Im not at all familar with the r-09. The only small 24 bit recorder i have experience with is a Micro Tracker and I'd rather have a M1 over a MT in a stealth situation.
SBD>MR>C>D>CD>EAC>SHN

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #21 on: October 16, 2006, 08:22:56 PM »
The only small 24 bit recorder i have experience with is a Micro Tracker and I'd rather have a M1 over a MT in a stealth situation.

me too!

Offline BC

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Gender: Male
  • Bongo Bongo
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #22 on: October 17, 2006, 11:50:17 AM »
The only small 24 bit recorder i have experience with is a Micro Tracker and I'd rather have a M1 over a MT in a stealth situation.

me too!

One advantage of the MT is that you can run more conservatively at 24 bit. Worrying about levels when stealthing drives me nuts.

In: DPA4022>V3>Microtracker/D8

Out: Morrison ELAD>Adcom GFA555mkII>Martin Logan Aerius i

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #23 on: October 17, 2006, 12:04:55 PM »
The only small 24 bit recorder i have experience with is a Micro Tracker and I'd rather have a M1 over a MT in a stealth situation.

me too!

One advantage of the MT is that you can run more conservatively at 24 bit. Worrying about levels when stealthing drives me nuts.
24-bit with the MT is not so nice. The recorder starts a new file (misses a few seconds) every 2.000.000.000 bytes. So you will have a break somewhere.
I don't want breaks.
Levels are a non issue. You know your gear, right?
After a few shows you know where to set stuff.

Offline BC

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Gender: Male
  • Bongo Bongo
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #24 on: October 17, 2006, 01:26:01 PM »
The only small 24 bit recorder i have experience with is a Micro Tracker and I'd rather have a M1 over a MT in a stealth situation.

me too!

One advantage of the MT is that you can run more conservatively at 24 bit. Worrying about levels when stealthing drives me nuts.
24-bit with the MT is not so nice. The recorder starts a new file (misses a few seconds) every 2.000.000.000 bytes. So you will have a break somewhere.
I don't want breaks.
Levels are a non issue. You know your gear, right?
After a few shows you know where to set stuff.

agree that the split required sucks for stealthing.
In: DPA4022>V3>Microtracker/D8

Out: Morrison ELAD>Adcom GFA555mkII>Martin Logan Aerius i

Offline Rick

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2537
  • Gender: Male
    • My Recordings
Re: schoeps and stealthing
« Reply #25 on: October 17, 2006, 01:33:03 PM »
Lemosax > R-09, and now you're talking

 :happy:
Retired Taper


 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.079 seconds with 36 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF