Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE  (Read 87004 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline guitard

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3730
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #90 on: October 21, 2008, 07:07:18 AM »
DOWNLOAD THIS (save target as) : www.sonicstudios.com/sdhctopc.pdf
 

Very imformative - thanks!
Mics: Schoeps MK41s & MK41Vs >:D
Pre-amps: BabyNbox & Platinum Nbox
Deck: Sony A10

Video: Canon HF G70 (4K), Sony FDR AX100 (4K), Pany ZS100 (4K)
Photo: Canon EOS 7D w/ Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L is III USM

A/V software: Sony Vegas Pro 18 (build 527) 64 bit / DVD Architect Pro 6.0 (build 237)

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #91 on: October 21, 2008, 07:36:10 AM »
So the question is:  Is the Class 4 SDHC guaranteed minimum Data Transfer Rate of 4MB/sec sufficient for the R-09HR or would the Class 6 SDHC guaranteed minimum Data Transfer Rate of 6MB/sec be more suited for our audio recording purposes?  I typically record at 24/48...
24/48 ->
3*2*48000 bytes/s or about 0.28 MB/s
Your card needs to be at least as fast as your audio stream is coming in.

Very interesting.  This may be a dumb question but can you explain how you came up with that formula?  How would that vary if recording at 24/96?

 :)

hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

Offline aaronji

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3897
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #92 on: October 21, 2008, 09:41:47 AM »
So the question is:  Is the Class 4 SDHC guaranteed minimum Data Transfer Rate of 4MB/sec sufficient for the R-09HR or would the Class 6 SDHC guaranteed minimum Data Transfer Rate of 6MB/sec be more suited for our audio recording purposes?  I typically record at 24/48...
24/48 ->
3*2*48000 bytes/s or about 0.28 MB/s
Your card needs to be at least as fast as your audio stream is coming in.

Very interesting.  This may be a dumb question but can you explain how you came up with that formula?  How would that vary if recording at 24/96?

 :)

I may be wrong, but:

8 bits per byte, so a 24 bit sample is 3 bytes, times 2 channels (stereo), times 48000 samples per second...

Offline Tenn Man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 66
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #93 on: October 21, 2008, 12:35:30 PM »
Are the built-in microphones on the Edirol R-09HR omnis or cardioids?

Offline jmz93

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #94 on: October 21, 2008, 12:45:03 PM »
Are the built-in microphones on the Edirol R-09HR omnis or cardioids?


OMnis. I havn't tried constructing some sort of baffle for them yet, but plan to, either out of some sort of sphere, or maybe a folded mouse pad.

Anyway, I find the mics in the HR sound better than the ones in the original R9 ... less peaky in the treble.

Offline guitard

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3730
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #95 on: October 21, 2008, 01:28:53 PM »
Are the built-in microphones on the Edirol R-09HR omnis or cardioids?


I asked Chris Church this question (he can do a mod for the built-in mics) and I believe he said they are omnis.
Mics: Schoeps MK41s & MK41Vs >:D
Pre-amps: BabyNbox & Platinum Nbox
Deck: Sony A10

Video: Canon HF G70 (4K), Sony FDR AX100 (4K), Pany ZS100 (4K)
Photo: Canon EOS 7D w/ Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L is III USM

A/V software: Sony Vegas Pro 18 (build 527) 64 bit / DVD Architect Pro 6.0 (build 237)

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #96 on: October 21, 2008, 04:20:19 PM »
Alright ~ time for a stupid question!

How does the SDHC class numbers work?  In other words, which is better for an Edirol R-09HR ~ class 2 ~ class 4 ~ or class 6?

TIA ~~

Everything you want to know about SDHC class rating is in a sdhctopc.pdf file!

 :coolguy: DOWNLOAD THIS (save target as) : www.sonicstudios.com/sdhctopc.pdf
 


Thanks for the info. Great reading.
+T :coolguy:
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15764
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #97 on: October 21, 2008, 08:34:29 PM »
Are the built-in microphones on the Edirol R-09HR omnis or cardioids?


OMnis. I havn't tried constructing some sort of baffle for them yet, but plan to, either out of some sort of sphere, or maybe a folded mouse pad.

If you use the internal mics much, do it.  It will improve the stereo imaging dramatically.  Jeklin disk all-in-one recorder.  ;D  See the first two posts here.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline jobseek2001

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #98 on: October 22, 2008, 02:14:30 AM »
So the question is:  Is the Class 4 SDHC guaranteed minimum Data Transfer Rate of 4MB/sec sufficient for the R-09HR or would the Class 6 SDHC guaranteed minimum Data Transfer Rate of 6MB/sec be more suited for our audio recording purposes?  I typically record at 24/48...
24/48 ->
3*2*48000 bytes/s or about 0.28 MB/s
Your card needs to be at least as fast as your audio stream is coming in.
Very interesting.  This may be a dumb question but can you explain how you came up with that formula?  How would that vary if recording at 24/96?
I may be wrong, but:

8 bits per byte, so a 24 bit sample is 3 bytes, times 2 channels (stereo), times 48000 samples per second...
Correct.
For 96000Hz versus 48000 you double the number 48000 in the formula.
It's:

(Number of bytes per sample * number of channels * samplerate) / (1024 * 1024)  MB/s

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #99 on: October 22, 2008, 06:37:52 AM »
So the question is:  Is the Class 4 SDHC guaranteed minimum Data Transfer Rate of 4MB/sec sufficient for the R-09HR or would the Class 6 SDHC guaranteed minimum Data Transfer Rate of 6MB/sec be more suited for our audio recording purposes?  I typically record at 24/48...
24/48 ->
3*2*48000 bytes/s or about 0.28 MB/s
Your card needs to be at least as fast as your audio stream is coming in.
Very interesting.  This may be a dumb question but can you explain how you came up with that formula?  How would that vary if recording at 24/96?
I may be wrong, but:

8 bits per byte, so a 24 bit sample is 3 bytes, times 2 channels (stereo), times 48000 samples per second...
Correct.
For 96000Hz versus 48000 you double the number 48000 in the formula.
It's:

(Number of bytes per sample * number of channels * samplerate) / (1024 * 1024)  MB/s



Thank you - +T's for the information!!

 :)


hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

Offline digifish_music

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
    • digifish music
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #100 on: October 22, 2008, 07:11:52 AM »

Thank you - +T's for the information!!

 :)




BTW: Sound Devices has the following calculator...

http://www.sounddevices.com/calculator/

digifish
- What's this knob do?

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #101 on: October 22, 2008, 04:06:57 PM »
Maybe it's a coincidence, but honestly I don`t think so. :hmmm:
I updated my R-09HR two days ago to the new Ver.!.05 firmware. Well, since than the weirdest thing is going on. Sometimes ( always at the worst time) when I turn my unit On, the display freezes on the Edirol R-09HR- Enjoy Recording Ver. 1.05 image appears. I have to remove the batteries, insert them again and press the Power button to turn the thing On.
Any guess? I' considering a down grade to th Ver.1.04 but I don't know if I can do that.
Appreciate any help from you guys.Thanks in advance  :coolguy:
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline GregDunn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #102 on: October 22, 2008, 05:50:05 PM »
Hmmm.... this just happened to me as well.  And I had to remove the batteries to turn off the unit.  I tried it three more times afterward, but it hasn't hung up again so far.  Might be an issue with the update?

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #103 on: October 22, 2008, 06:04:00 PM »
Hmmm.... this just happened to me as well.  And I had to remove the batteries to turn off the unit.  I tried it three more times afterward, but it hasn't hung up again so far.  Might be an issue with the update?


Well, I'm not alone. Seems to be an issue with the update indeed.
And I don't know what to do  :-[
Have you contacted Roland US? See, I'd do this myself but I can't. I live overseas and they only accept contact when you provide an US address. Of course I can always contact Roland Brasil, but they are known around here for their automatic responses and, to be honest, I'm sure they are not going to help me at all.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2008, 06:14:43 PM by Dede2002 »
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline digifish_music

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
    • digifish music
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #104 on: October 22, 2008, 07:49:04 PM »
Hmmm.... this just happened to me as well.  And I had to remove the batteries to turn off the unit.  I tried it three more times afterward, but it hasn't hung up again so far.  Might be an issue with the update?


Well, I'm not alone. Seems to be an issue with the update indeed.
And I don't know what to do  :-[
Have you contacted Roland US? See, I'd do this myself but I can't. I live overseas and they only accept contact when you provide an US address. Of course I can always contact Roland Brasil, but they are known around here for their automatic responses and, to be honest, I'm sure they are not going to help me at all.

The first thing you should try is to re-install the update...and or re-install 1.04 if that doesn't work.

digifish
- What's this knob do?

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF