Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE  (Read 86961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3591
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #315 on: April 27, 2009, 02:27:54 AM »
Chris Church told me that the Edirol 0 gain was about a "45" setting; Anything below that and it is attenuating and will add noise. 

Yea, at 45, my entire show would have been brick walled... the 9 setting on the R09 was always low enough that I never had any issues with brick walling, but I always had to normalize in post

Sheesh, I've had the 09 in front of ear bursting stacks at 55 and still had to boost post.  I get huge dynamic range with all my mikes, (mk4, atcmc and dpa), so something is wrong here. 

Not sure whether your N Box has a 20db boost and if so, whether you had it on. 

No, it is just on or off, there are no other settings or switches

Offline jobseek2001

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #316 on: April 27, 2009, 06:14:02 AM »
Chris Church told me that the Edirol 0 gain was about a "45" setting; Anything below that and it is attenuating and will add noise. 

Yea, at 45, my entire show would have been brick walled...
'Clipped'?

And at 9 at the R09 you don't need 20 on the HR.

Offline jobseek2001

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #317 on: April 27, 2009, 06:19:33 AM »
Its all in my sig, but.....
Schoeps MK4 > nBox + > R090HR set to 20 and every switch off
20!? You know what signal that takes for 0dBFS?
And you are using a 'pre'?

And no, what level is the 0dbfs???? That was my initial question

The nbox+ is the pre-amp
Pre is way too much here.
At 20 on the HR you need around 18.5 dBu for 0dBFS.
So you are amplifiying and then attenuating way too much. You probably don't need a pre anyway.

On the 9 it is around 8 dBu with level at 9.

Please correct me if my numbers are wrong.

Offline Craig T

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4314
    • LMA
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #318 on: April 27, 2009, 10:12:08 AM »
Its all in my sig, but.....
Schoeps MK4 > nBox + > R090HR set to 20 and every switch off

something's fishy.  I don't think I've ever had to run my r09hr that low.  I'm typically 30-60 to get peaks at -6 with no evidence of reduced dynamics.
Schoeps cmc6/4v / Beyer mc950 / Line Audio CM3, OM1 / ADK A51 / Church Audio CA-14
Naiant Tinybox v2.2 / NBox(P) / Church Audio ST9200 / CA-UGLY
Sony PCM-M10 / Zoom F3 / Zoom F6

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3591
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #319 on: April 27, 2009, 09:01:58 PM »
Pre is way too much here.
At 20 on the HR you need around 18.5 dBu for 0dBFS.
So you are amplifiying and then attenuating way too much. You probably don't need a pre anyway.

If I dont use the pre, then how do you suggest I get power to my mics?
 
Quote from: jobseek2001 link=topic=109564.msg1614304#msg1614304
On the 9 it is around 8 dBu with level at 9.
Please correct me if my numbers are wrong.

Thats just is, does anyone know where to run the R09hr (regardless of external mics or pre) by the line in connection where the deck does no amplification or attenuation?

Offline 69mako

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 645
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #320 on: April 27, 2009, 11:16:07 PM »

Thats just is, does anyone know where to run the R09hr (regardless of external mics or pre) by the line in connection where the deck does no amplification or attenuation?


I've always heard 40-45 is the proper setting for the r-09.

Mako
http://db.etree.org/69mako

007: Church Audio CA-14c -> Church Audio St-9100 preamp -> R-09HR

Open: Busman BSC1 mics (X2) -> Hydra Cables (X2) -> Tmod R4

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3591
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #321 on: April 27, 2009, 11:36:47 PM »
I've always heard 40-45 is the proper setting for the r-09.

It was either 9 or 11, and this is the R-09HR thread... thats what I am trying to gen an answer on

Offline 69mako

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 645
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #322 on: April 27, 2009, 11:42:59 PM »
I've always heard 40-45 is the proper setting for the r-09.

It was either 9 or 11, and this is the R-09HR thread... thats what I am trying to gen an answer on

Go to page one of this thread....

Mako
http://db.etree.org/69mako

007: Church Audio CA-14c -> Church Audio St-9100 preamp -> R-09HR

Open: Busman BSC1 mics (X2) -> Hydra Cables (X2) -> Tmod R4

Offline digifish_music

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
    • digifish music
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #323 on: April 27, 2009, 11:46:27 PM »

If I dont use the pre, then how do you suggest I get power to my mics?
 

A simple phantom power supply?...



digifish
- What's this knob do?

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3591
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #324 on: April 27, 2009, 11:51:25 PM »
A simple phantom power supply?...

Schoeps mics are caps, so I need cables or full bodies... neither of which work well for stealthing

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3591
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #325 on: April 27, 2009, 11:54:41 PM »
Go to page one of this thread....

All I see is a post with the term "I guess" related to volume settings, so that does not answer my question... is that the post you are referencing?

Offline 69mako

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 645
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #326 on: April 27, 2009, 11:59:14 PM »
Go to page one of this thread....

All I see is a post with the term "I guess" related to volume settings, so that does not answer my question... is that the post you are referencing?

He is a quote from Mr. Church:

Chris Church told me that the Edirol 0 gain was about a "45" setting; Anything below that and it is attenuating and will add noise.

That is what I use anbd have NEVER had any of the problems you are talknig about. 

http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,118491.0.html

Mako

« Last Edit: April 28, 2009, 12:05:23 AM by 69mako »
http://db.etree.org/69mako

007: Church Audio CA-14c -> Church Audio St-9100 preamp -> R-09HR

Open: Busman BSC1 mics (X2) -> Hydra Cables (X2) -> Tmod R4

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3591
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #327 on: April 28, 2009, 12:33:27 AM »
Chris Church told me that the Edirol 0 gain was about a "45" setting; Anything below that and it is attenuating and will add noise.

Well, at a loud rock show, 45 would have caused brickwalling.... maybe I need to move back to he R09

http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,118491.0.html
Another posting with wors like "thought to be" and "usually set"

Not sure why after almost a year we dont have an answer... wish I knew how to test this and get the answer, but I am no engineer

Offline jobseek2001

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #328 on: April 28, 2009, 02:07:02 AM »
Pre is way too much here.
At 20 on the HR you need around 18.5 dBu for 0dBFS.
So you are amplifiying and then attenuating way too much. You probably don't need a pre anyway.

If I dont use the pre, then how do you suggest I get power to my mics?
By using a power supply? Battery box? Or phantom-equivalent?
 
Quote
Thats just is, does anyone know where to run the R09hr (regardless of external mics or pre) by the line in connection where the deck does no amplification or attenuation?
Unity gain? That is the default gain setting for the device. Documented elsewhere in the thread, sorry.

Offline jobseek2001

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #329 on: April 28, 2009, 02:09:03 AM »
A simple phantom power supply?...

Schoeps mics are caps, so I need cables or full bodies... neither of which work well for stealthing
I stealthed with Sennheiser K6's. Works quite OK.
Of course stuff works better nowadays without K6's.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.105 seconds with 41 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF