Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: c4 VS lsd2  (Read 8633 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kirk97132

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
c4 VS lsd2
« on: October 12, 2006, 08:08:28 PM »
SO I can't make up my mind.  I'll be running these into a P2  with no external pre(yet).  Pros and cons on these two mic's?  thanx, Kirk

PS:my buddy decide to hang on to his modded nak 700's.  can't say I blame him
Logged

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2006, 08:25:39 PM »
Stereo mics are the heat.....but you are limited to coincident techniques..no spaced or near coincident.

I have an AKG 426b, and it is by far my favorite microphone.

Cons of stereo mic--- bulky...coincident techniques only..

C4s--vanilla sound quality, fewer pattern options than the lsd, more time to put up(the stereo mic..you just aim and forget..)







Logged

Offline ~~~>

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 137
  • Gender: Male
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2006, 08:47:49 PM »
Grab these Kirk and then you have leftover $$ for a pre.   ;D  cards and omnis.  Can't beat that!

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=72325.0
Logged

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2006, 10:28:31 PM »
Quote from: kirk97132 on October 12, 2006, 08:08:28 PM
Pros and cons on these two mic's?

Small diaphragm condensors (SDC) like the Studio Projects C-4 generally offer greater transient detail, while large diaphragm condensors (LDC) like the Studio ProjectsLSD2 offer a more lush, meaty sound with less transient detail.  Just depends on what kind of sound you're after, depending on your recording situations, playback, and ears.
Logged
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2006, 05:48:18 AM »
there is a good general idea of SDC vs LDC
Logged

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2006, 07:26:37 AM »
the LSD doesnt' lack detail in any regard (concerning less transient detail over the c4), so dont let that scare you.

every now and then I think of selling mine, and then listen to some recordings i've made w/it and say "damn"....
I can't think of a better way to spend $500 on this hobby.

stereo mics rock!  and coincident techniques, especialy with LD mics, are where its at!
Logged

Offline vwmule

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2060
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2006, 11:55:44 AM »
Speaking of the donkey dick (as coined by Nick) has anyone picked up the updated model? Looks nicer and supposedly offers minor improvements.
Logged

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2006, 12:03:59 PM »
Quote from: kirk97132 on October 12, 2006, 08:08:28 PM
SO I can't make up my mind.  I'll be running these into a P2  with no external pre(yet).  Pros and cons on these two mic's?  thanx, Kirk

PS:my buddy decide to hang on to his modded nak 700's.  can't say I blame him

Having owned the C4's, but not the LSD2's, I'd agree with Nick. The LSD2 sounds great. I did like the C4's, but I've heard some very nice LSD2 recordings. I am starting to appreciate the the LD microphone sound more and more. Plus, all the pattern choices with the LSD2, make it an easy decision in my mind.
Logged
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2006, 12:34:36 PM »
looks like the upgraded the cable as that one is a screw on and not the normal style "snap in" jobbie.
wonder if they used better stock for it.
Logged

Offline Low Spark

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4311
  • Gender: Male
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2006, 05:34:01 PM »
Ive recently purchased an LSD2 and ran it twice. Ive ran one before several times thats the reason i bought one. I love the sound. cant wait to run a MS. Need to get Nicks silver cable here shortly.
Logged
Mics: AKG 481

American by Birth - A Southerner by the Grace of God.

I caught myself pumping the air with my fist, throwing elbows and getting down like an 18-year-old on his first mushroom trip on the lawn at Raleigh. But since every night is Saturday

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2006, 05:36:04 PM »
damn' right you do.
;-)
Logged

Offline Low Spark

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4311
  • Gender: Male
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2006, 05:38:47 PM »
I Am a true beliver in those silver cables. Best sound by far.
Logged
Mics: AKG 481

American by Birth - A Southerner by the Grace of God.

I caught myself pumping the air with my fist, throwing elbows and getting down like an 18-year-old on his first mushroom trip on the lawn at Raleigh. But since every night is Saturday

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2006, 05:41:16 PM »
me to.  they brighten and tighten.
:)

i've got the parts for one last cable....
name your length, and no lying!
Logged

Offline WiFiJeff

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 980
  • Gender: Male
  • I tape therefore I am.
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2006, 09:35:09 AM »
Quote from: Teddy on October 12, 2006, 08:25:39 PM


I have an AKG 426b, and it is by far my favorite microphone.



So I finally decided this is the bestest upgrade for the LSD2.  But AKG US says it is discontinued.  :(

By the way, Cascade (of recent Fathead Ribbon mic fame) has a single point LD stereo mic listed as coming soon.

Jeff
Logged

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: c4 VS lsd2
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2006, 09:38:04 AM »
no..the 422 is discontinued.
http://www.akg.com/products/powerslave,mynodeid,186,id,216,pid,216,_language,EN.html


edit they are discontinued...BUT there is a massive amount of overstock here...I can get you one if you want one Jeff..

just PM me. I get german mics for folks all the time.

Teddy
Quote from: WiFiJeff on October 18, 2006, 09:35:09 AM
Quote from: Teddy on October 12, 2006, 08:25:39 PM


I have an AKG 426b, and it is by far my favorite microphone.



So I finally decided this is the bestest upgrade for the LSD2.  But AKG US says it is discontinued.  :(

By the way, Cascade (of recent Fathead Ribbon mic fame) has a single point LD stereo mic listed as coming soon.

Jeff
« Last Edit: October 18, 2006, 09:43:33 AM by Teddy »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.087 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF