1 sounds like a slightly more open pattern. A bit more low frequency fullness, more room, more audience reaction off-axis, less sibilant.
I prefer 1 in isolation. But 2 could be useful in combination with other mics, leveraging its tighter directivity (which cannot be modified), and perhaps it's frequency response difference (which can). Hard to tell how much the frequency balance could be EQ'd to preference without trying it, which is generally my real world comparison on that aspect between microphones. Sometimes that can be done simply and easily, sometimes it can't be. I think that has to do with the presence of narrow band resonances or lack of them and overall response smoothness, regardless of the apparent response and smoothness prior to any correction. If you want to do that or not is an important question.
So generally 1, with the caveats above.