Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6  (Read 108620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline H₂O

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5745
  • Gender: Male
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #360 on: February 08, 2015, 12:41:18 PM »
Anybody use metal film caps instead of electrolytic caps?
Music can at the least least explain you and at the most expand you
LMA Recordings

List

Offline florian.ardelean

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Gender: Male
    • My studio's website
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #361 on: February 09, 2015, 08:42:01 AM »
So if I understand correctly...the capacitor mod is to reduce noise when using phantom power? Can somebody indicate when the noise occurs? Only with certain mics? True condensers? Electrets? Dynamics?


The extra noise occurs only with *some* condenser mics. I saved the article describing which (I thing it was just older mic models? Or mics that take more current? can't recall. Will edit the post if and when I find the link)

EDIT: Here is the original post: http://www.audiomastersforum.net/amforum/index.php/topic,8551.0.html

Dynamics don't care much about P48 if they're properly wired so it wouldn't make a dfference. You can fry electrets if you apply P48 without going through a step-down PIP adapter. But you can use the internal preamps :) And if you would, then the P48 problem would likely turn up.

Here's a nice tech review of the noise floor of the original "stock" DR680:
http://www.lindos.co.uk/index.php?page=test_and_measurement&subpage=SOURCE=Results&subsubpage=/FlexiData/Results/files/filename/399/res.html


By the way, does anybody still have the service manual and schematic? Would love a drobox link if possible.. There is something uploaded in the "manuals" sections but due to size constaints it is cut into small pieces and it seems to be missing some parts.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2015, 09:18:59 AM by florian.ardelean »
Recorders: SD 744T Tascam HDP2 Sony D50 Olympus LS100 Zoom H2 Tascam IM2
Mixers: SD 422 SD 302 Mackie VLZ4
Microphones: Rode NT2A x 2 - Sanken CS1 - Senn MKH415T x 2 - Senn MKH40 - AKG D190 - Sennheiser MKE-2-Gold - Sennheiser MKE 40 - Audio Technica CC417
Headphones: Sennheiser HD280 x 2 - KRK KNS 8400 x 2 - Beyer 880 - Senn HD 590 - Senn HD201
Headphone amps: Sound Devices HX3 - Presonus HP4
Studio: Protools 9 HD2x2 - Digidesign C24 - Tascam 1804 - Mbox Mini 2 - Macbook with Reaper
Monitoring: JBL 4675Cx3, JBL 8340Ax2, Behringer B2030Px3
Subwoofers: Altec Lansing LFx3, JBL 18', Dynaudio BM14s
Macpro 1.1, MBP 13 2011, HP xw8600 x 2
Storage: Facilis Terrablock 24D

Offline fsulloway

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1765
  • Gender: Male
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #362 on: February 09, 2015, 09:08:41 AM »
Where does everyone set there mix levels for independent channels and stereo mix too??

Todd

I never record the stereo mix. Chances that I get the mix perfect at the show is close to none so I just mix at home.
schoeps ccm4's, mk4v, mk2h, mk41
AKG ck62, ck63, ck61
Nbob/pfa, Naiant/pfa
SD 10T

"Wilmington, North Carolina....Let us hear your motherf***in' pride!" Patterson Hood 12-09-04

"Just About Unwound From Chasing Down The Sound"

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15736
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #363 on: February 09, 2015, 09:23:19 AM »
I typically  leave the stereo mix at 100% and adjust the individual channel mix levels to where ever they need to be.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline florian.ardelean

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Gender: Male
    • My studio's website
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #364 on: February 09, 2015, 09:52:35 AM »

Also about battery power i build a power supply myself. Can say that its checked for more than a 6 months of use and its very good and stable. No problem with overheating and its very efficent.


Hello :)

Did you put the module inside the 680? Did it fit OK? Did you do any other modifications to the existing power supply?

Thank you.
Recorders: SD 744T Tascam HDP2 Sony D50 Olympus LS100 Zoom H2 Tascam IM2
Mixers: SD 422 SD 302 Mackie VLZ4
Microphones: Rode NT2A x 2 - Sanken CS1 - Senn MKH415T x 2 - Senn MKH40 - AKG D190 - Sennheiser MKE-2-Gold - Sennheiser MKE 40 - Audio Technica CC417
Headphones: Sennheiser HD280 x 2 - KRK KNS 8400 x 2 - Beyer 880 - Senn HD 590 - Senn HD201
Headphone amps: Sound Devices HX3 - Presonus HP4
Studio: Protools 9 HD2x2 - Digidesign C24 - Tascam 1804 - Mbox Mini 2 - Macbook with Reaper
Monitoring: JBL 4675Cx3, JBL 8340Ax2, Behringer B2030Px3
Subwoofers: Altec Lansing LFx3, JBL 18', Dynaudio BM14s
Macpro 1.1, MBP 13 2011, HP xw8600 x 2
Storage: Facilis Terrablock 24D

tomuo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #365 on: February 09, 2015, 01:37:11 PM »
So if I understand correctly...the capacitor mod is to reduce noise when using phantom power? Can somebody indicate when the noise occurs? Only with certain mics? True condensers? Electrets? Dynamics?


The extra noise occurs only with *some* condenser mics. I saved the article describing which (I thing it was just older mic models? Or mics that take more current? can't recall. Will edit the post if and when I find the link)

EDIT: Here is the original post: http://www.audiomastersforum.net/amforum/index.php/topic,8551.0.html

Dynamics don't care much about P48 if they're properly wired so it wouldn't make a dfference. You can fry electrets if you apply P48 without going through a step-down PIP adapter. But you can use the internal preamps :) And if you would, then the P48 problem would likely turn up.
mkII has larger caps for 48V smoothing. (4.7uF instead of 1uF)

Quote
By the way, does anybody still have the service manual and schematic? Would love a drobox link if possible.. There is something uploaded in the "manuals" sections but due to size constaints it is cut into small pieces and it seems to be missing some parts.
mkI Service Manual 3493KB, Schematics 808KB.    PM me your email address.

Tom.

Offline lukpac

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 197
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #366 on: February 09, 2015, 01:55:11 PM »
The extra noise occurs only with *some* condenser mics. I saved the article describing which (I thing it was just older mic models? Or mics that take more current? can't recall. Will edit the post if and when I find the link)

EDIT: Here is the original post: http://www.audiomastersforum.net/amforum/index.php/topic,8551.0.html

Dynamics don't care much about P48 if they're properly wired so it wouldn't make a dfference. You can fry electrets if you apply P48 without going through a step-down PIP adapter. But you can use the internal preamps :) And if you would, then the P48 problem would likely turn up.

Here's a nice tech review of the noise floor of the original "stock" DR680:
http://www.lindos.co.uk/index.php?page=test_and_measurement&subpage=SOURCE=Results&subsubpage=/FlexiData/Results/files/filename/399/res.html


By the way, does anybody still have the service manual and schematic? Would love a drobox link if possible.. There is something uploaded in the "manuals" sections but due to size constaints it is cut into small pieces and it seems to be missing some parts.

Thanks for the link. Seems to be a quirk with the 680 combined with quirks in certain mics.

BTW, by "electret" I meant mics that are marketed as standard condensers but are permanently charged and require phantom. Of course some of those can be run via PIP if the phantom adapter is separate and can be removed.

Also, while I haven't experienced the noise issue with my 680, I *did* notice a quirk. I got a pair of Rode M5s, and I was having issues with hum when the 680 was plugged in to AC. Touch the grille on the M5s and there would be tons of hum, unless you also touched a grounding point on the 680. It turned out the grille wasn't grounded. But that was *not* an issue with any of my other interfaces. Clearly there was some difference with how the 680 handled grounding. Regardless, I sent my mics back and got new ones that have the grilles properly grounded, and hum is no longer an issue.

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #367 on: February 09, 2015, 02:46:36 PM »
So if I understand correctly...the capacitor mod is to reduce noise when using phantom power? Can somebody indicate when the noise occurs? Only with certain mics? True condensers? Electrets? Dynamics?


The extra noise occurs only with *some* condenser mics. I saved the article describing which (I thing it was just older mic models? Or mics that take more current? can't recall. Will edit the post if and when I find the link)

EDIT: Here is the original post: http://www.audiomastersforum.net/amforum/index.php/topic,8551.0.html

Dynamics don't care much about P48 if they're properly wired so it wouldn't make a dfference. You can fry electrets if you apply P48 without going through a step-down PIP adapter. But you can use the internal preamps :) And if you would, then the P48 problem would likely turn up.
mkII has larger caps for 48V smoothing. (4.7uF instead of 1uF)

Quote
By the way, does anybody still have the service manual and schematic? Would love a drobox link if possible.. There is something uploaded in the "manuals" sections but due to size constaints it is cut into small pieces and it seems to be missing some parts.
mkI Service Manual 3493KB, Schematics 808KB.    PM me your email address.

Tom.

Tom:

That's so cool that you'll provide schematics! PM sent!

I wonder if you guys have figured out why some of the first gen DR-680's overheated and killed the power supply. I've had three of them and mine is out of warranty. But, I'd like to make a circuit change to fix that overheating problem. Other than that, I love mine. I stuck with the DR-680 even though my first two died. It has all the features I need. I haven't found anything i like better for 6-8 channel recording in the field yet.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline 2manyrocks

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #368 on: February 09, 2015, 03:11:40 PM »
Why not buy a MKii that is already factory modded and use the 680 for those instances where more channels are needed via the cascade function? 

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #369 on: February 09, 2015, 03:34:29 PM »
Why not buy a MKii that is already factory modded and use the 680 for those instances where more channels are needed via the cascade function?

:) I will probably do that.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline Life In Rewind

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 883
    • www.rovingsign.com
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #370 on: February 09, 2015, 04:36:20 PM »
So what are the prospects for repair of broken 680s?

I BO'ed that broken one from ebay last week - should be here before the weekend.

Offline PiotrSzmidt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #371 on: February 10, 2015, 04:32:38 AM »

Also about battery power i build a power supply myself. Can say that its checked for more than a 6 months of use and its very good and stable. No problem with overheating and its very efficent.


Hello :)

Did you put the module inside the 680? Did it fit OK? Did you do any other modifications to the existing power supply?

Thank you.

nope, i didn't put battery inside. A did a battery pack external, connected by plug to the 12v connector on the side. This way I also made another cable plug to powet up my Saffire Focusrite 26 PRO for additional preamps that im sending to Tascam 7-8 track by SPDIF if needed.

Offline PiotrSzmidt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #372 on: February 10, 2015, 04:35:35 AM »
mkII has larger caps for 48V smoothing. (4.7uF instead of 1uF)

That is exacly what i did.

Offline connloyalist

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • Gender: Female
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #373 on: February 10, 2015, 04:12:51 PM »
I did some testing tonight with phantom power noise and difference between hi-lo gain.

Test setup was this:
mic -> Radial ProMS2 "direct 1" -> DR680 channel 1 +P48.
Radial ProMS2 "direct 2" -> DR680 channel 4.
Channel 1+4 = left and right of stereo mix. Direct 2 on the ProMS2 is transformer isolated from the direct 1 that carries the phantom power.

The idea was that if there is a difference between a channel with and without phantom power in terms of noise this test ought to show it. If I am making a mistake in my reasoning, feel free to let me know.

Mics tested: Shure KSM141 cardioid and omni, Rode NT5 omni capsule, Rode NT4 MJE-384K capsule, AT4081, Advanced Audio CM1084 (cardioid) in Bright and Vintage settings.

Result: I could not prove that there is any noise difference between the phantom and non-phantom channels. I did see on most mics a distinct hump around 100Hz on all mics except the AT4081. Perhaps due to environmental noise that the figure 8 ribbon blocks out.

Perhaps when one channel has phantom power all channels suffer the same amount of noise? Or none of the tested mics suffer from this problem, as I understand it varies from one mic to the next.

A second thing I tested was the suggestion that switching from low +15 to high -8 (for example) would make a difference in noise. Here I can say that yes, there is a noticeable difference. On most mics the dfference started around 1000Hz and widened to around 2~4 dB at 10KHz. So in a quiet section of the recording (me not saying anything in my quiet living room) the low +15 channel might be at -114 dB, the high -8 channel would be at -116dB at 10KHz.

The biggest difference was with the CM1084 in vintage setting, Low +20 and High -3. There the difference at 10Khz widened out to around 8dB.

Regards, Christine



Offline lukpac

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 197
Re: TASCAM DR-680 portable 8-track #6
« Reply #374 on: February 10, 2015, 04:19:02 PM »
Thanks for that Christine. I've never done a measurement of the LOW/HIGH noise difference, but it was very audible, to the point that I'm slightly embarrassed at the (thankfully one) recording I made with the switches set to LOW. I wonder if that will still be an issue with the mkII.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF