Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: mbho > mp2 > 722 vs mbho > 722 (examples posted)  (Read 2734 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hoyt

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.the-hoyts.com
mbho > mp2 > 722 vs mbho > 722 (examples posted)
« on: March 01, 2006, 12:38:11 PM »
I haven't tried this, but I'm taping a PMB show tonight and thought I might give it a whirl.  I like the 722 pre just fine, but I always liked the mbho > mp2 combo, and I have this sucker just taking up space, why not?  Anyone have any strong feelings about this?    :laugh:

Thanks!

--hoyt
« Last Edit: March 07, 2006, 06:40:19 PM by hoyt »
dpa4028/4023/4011er > sx-m2d2/ sx-r4+

Offline terrapinj

  • Jonesin' for Tunes
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6553
  • Gender: Male
Re: mp2 > 722
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2006, 12:40:07 PM »
i'd be curious to here a comp. of the two different pres
JW mod AKG 460b (ck61/ck63 or mk46/ck1x/ck3x)>  EAA PSP-2 > 722

Segue Dogstar XLRs and Interconnects

ISO: (2) ck2x

Offline hoyt

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.the-hoyts.com
Re: mp2 > 722
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2006, 06:39:48 PM »
If you're interested here are some links (the 24 bit Sixer's set will finish uploading tomorrow probably):

Pat McGee Band @ 16bit - http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=34469
Pat McGee Band @ 24 bit - http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=34470
Stephen Kellogg and the Sixers @ 16 bit - http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=34500

For these two sets I started with the mp2 as the pre, then at about the half way point took it out of the chain.  There are notes in the text files as to when I took it out.  I tried to keep the levels similar, but that was hard.  When the mp2 was in, I kept the 722's line in level at -2 for all of the sets, and the mp2 was anywhere between 8 and 10 o'clock on the dials.  When it was just the 722, the levels were between 40 and 50.  There was also an opener (Amy Cooper) who I did the same for, but she's not on the archive, so the FLACs are sitting on my hard drive.

I'll retitle the thread so that it makes more sense now.  I haven't given them a good listen yet to hear the differences, but what do you think?  Thanks,

--hoyt
dpa4028/4023/4011er > sx-m2d2/ sx-r4+

Offline shruggy1987

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 323
  • Gender: Male
  • Team Ithaca
Re: mbho > mp2 > 722 vs mbho > 722 (examples posted)
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2006, 09:20:04 AM »
is this is Aerco MP2 or the SD MP2?
SP LSD2 > bm2 UA-5 (coax out) > M-Audio Microtrack
SP LSD2 > bm2 UA-5 > MacBook Pro

Offline stigs

  • Fratboy Meathead
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3914
  • Gender: Male
  • Lame Duck Sessions > Monkey Drum Jam
Re: mbho > mp2 > 722 vs mbho > 722 (examples posted)
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2006, 11:15:11 AM »
how long were the sets? how were both bands?
-Stigs

Peluso CEMC-6 > Segue Dogstar 15' XLRs > BM2P+ UA-5 > SP Optical Cable > Nomad JB3  w. SVU-1 & Macbook Core 2 Duo

Team Pittsburgh

Offline hoyt

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.the-hoyts.com
Re: mbho > mp2 > 722 vs mbho > 722 (examples posted)
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2006, 09:34:24 PM »
is this is Aerco MP2 or the SD MP2?

SD - should have noted that. 

how long were the sets? how were both bands?

The sixers were on for 45 minutes or so I think.  And PMB was about an hour and half.  Both sets were pretty good, but the PMB set started really slowly...

--hoyt

EDIT: Here's the sixer's 24 bit source - http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=34543
« Last Edit: March 21, 2006, 09:37:16 PM by hoyt »
dpa4028/4023/4011er > sx-m2d2/ sx-r4+

Offline drewloo

  • Friend of Salsa
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3060
  • it's recreational
Re: mbho > mp2 > 722 vs mbho > 722 (examples posted)
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2006, 10:29:00 PM »
I think it sounds better without the trusty MP-2; less muddy sounding and clearer.  I'm listening on PC speakers, fwiw.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 31 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF