Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers  (Read 6970 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline iphone

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2004, 12:45:12 PM »
whomever said that LDs are less detailed forgot to mention that this is only from a distance perhaps(?).
Up close, on an instrument or stage lip, they are very detailed....AND throw a big fat soundstage. 





they sound less detailed mainly because of thicker and bigger diagphram. a typical
sd condenser has 3 micron thick diaph. over 16-19 mm capsule,whereas most
ld mics have 6 micron thickness over a 25mm-24mm capsule.

why 3 micron thick ld capsules are not mass produced?

easy answer.because none of the mic manufacture has until this day produced a ld mic(34 mm) with properly tensioned 3 micron diagph capsule.

there is currently one facility on earth,who can deliever high quality tensioning and impeccable hand tuning of the capsule,that is stephen paul audio in california.

working on these low mass and thin tolerances,requires talent.mic building becomes art.

Offline Craig T

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4312
    • LMA
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2004, 01:12:18 PM »

they sound less detailed mainly because of thicker and bigger diagphram. a typical
sd condenser has 3 micron thick diaph. over 16-19 mm capsule,whereas most
ld mics have 6 micron thickness over a 25mm-24mm capsule.

why 3 micron thick ld capsules are not mass produced?

easy answer.because none of the mic manufacture has until this day produced a ld mic(34 mm) with properly tensioned 3 micron diagph capsule.

The ADK A51TL's use a 3u diaphram.
http://www.adkmic.com/specs/TL.html
Schoeps cmc6/4v / Beyer mc950 / Line Audio CM3, OM1 / ADK A51 / Church Audio CA-14
Naiant Tinybox v2.2 / NBox(P) / Church Audio ST9200 / CA-UGLY
Sony PCM-M10 / Zoom F3 / Zoom F6

Offline John R

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 10100
  • Gender: Male
    • www.tapers.org
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2004, 01:15:37 PM »

they sound less detailed mainly because of thicker and bigger diagphram. a typical
sd condenser has 3 micron thick diaph. over 16-19 mm capsule,whereas most
ld mics have 6 micron thickness over a 25mm-24mm capsule.

why 3 micron thick ld capsules are not mass produced?

easy answer.because none of the mic manufacture has until this day produced a ld mic(34 mm) with properly tensioned 3 micron diagph capsule.

The ADK A51TL's use a 3u diaphram.
http://www.adkmic.com/specs/TL.html

good to know that my mics are comparable to stephen paul's
we all live downstream.

Offline iphone

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2004, 01:22:54 PM »

they sound less detailed mainly because of thicker and bigger diagphram. a typical
sd condenser has 3 micron thick diaph. over 16-19 mm capsule,whereas most
ld mics have 6 micron thickness over a 25mm-24mm capsule.

why 3 micron thick ld capsules are not mass produced?

easy answer.because none of the mic manufacture has until this day produced a ld mic(34 mm) with properly tensioned 3 micron diagph capsule.

The ADK A51TL's use a 3u diaphram.
http://www.adkmic.com/specs/TL.html



does not mean it is properly tuned and tensioned.and the size is 27mm not 34mm aka ck12.the new spa mic will be the first properly tensioned and tuned 3 micron ld capsule.

Offline iphone

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2004, 01:24:00 PM »
thats what I thought, Craig, thanks.
I thought SP Audio was capable of sub-micron work, at least as fine as a single micron?
where is VA Taper when you need him?

tony is capable of doing 0.6 micron!yes for large diagp.

but it will cost ya.

Offline John R

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 10100
  • Gender: Male
    • www.tapers.org
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2004, 01:28:59 PM »
we all live downstream.

Offline iphone

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #21 on: September 29, 2004, 01:31:31 PM »
to  my knowledge yes.maybe va-taper could step in here,as he has a spa product.

Offline Craig T

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4312
    • LMA
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #22 on: September 29, 2004, 01:34:41 PM »
does not mean it is properly tuned and tensioned.and the size is 27mm not 34mm aka ck12.the new spa mic will be the first properly tensioned and tuned 3 micron ld capsule.

saw that coming...  "properly" is a subjective term.  SPA has their reference, others may differ.  I would love to own a SPA mic, and may some day, so its no slam against their claims.
Schoeps cmc6/4v / Beyer mc950 / Line Audio CM3, OM1 / ADK A51 / Church Audio CA-14
Naiant Tinybox v2.2 / NBox(P) / Church Audio ST9200 / CA-UGLY
Sony PCM-M10 / Zoom F3 / Zoom F6

Offline jk labs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 191
  • Gender: Male
  • Straight wire!
    • Mics, pre and ADC...
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #23 on: September 29, 2004, 05:03:08 PM »

they sound less detailed mainly because of thicker and bigger diagphram. a typical
sd condenser has 3 micron thick diaph. over 16-19 mm capsule,whereas most
ld mics have 6 micron thickness over a 25mm-24mm capsule.

why 3 micron thick ld capsules are not mass produced?

easy answer.because none of the mic manufacture has until this day produced a ld mic(34 mm) with properly tensioned 3 micron diagph capsule.

there is currently one facility on earth,who can deliever high quality tensioning and impeccable hand tuning of the capsule,that is stephen paul audio in california.

working on these low mass and thin tolerances,requires talent.mic building becomes art.

You got to elaborate on this. 3 micron conductive film is available and used in a number
of large (1" and bigger) condencer microphones. Granted some of them very expensive.

But your statement as it stands begs for a few pointed questions: 
How would you go about proving that all but one maker has full control on the process of diaphragm tensioning?
Heck for that matter, how do you define the term "proper tensioning" without resorting to
religion?


Offline jk labs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 191
  • Gender: Male
  • Straight wire!
    • Mics, pre and ADC...
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #24 on: September 29, 2004, 05:23:51 PM »
thats what I thought, Craig, thanks.
I thought SP Audio was capable of sub-micron work, at least as fine as a single micron?
where is VA Taper when you need him?

tony is capable of doing 0.6 micron!yes for large diagp.

but it will cost ya.

And for how long would such a diaphragm stay properly tensioned?
This has been *the* challenge for many many years....  to control (read stop) the aging process.

PS Not trying to be difficult here but I think we deserve to see the facts
when such claims are made.

Offline John R

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 10100
  • Gender: Male
    • www.tapers.org
Re: Large vs. Small Diaphragm Condensers
« Reply #25 on: September 29, 2004, 10:51:39 PM »
thanks mike, going into my favorites
we all live downstream.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.17 seconds with 35 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF