Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Anyone heard of the Clara for HRTF?  (Read 5339 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re: Anyone heard of the Clara for HRTF?
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2006, 01:48:22 AM »
For anyone interested, you may view the full text of the patent (but not the figures, unfortunately).  Or, search for patent # 4,819,270.  Oh, BTW, the patent expired on 4 Apr 2001.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2006, 01:04:11 AM by Brian Skalinder »
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Offline balou2

  • Crippled, but still dancin'
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4442
  • Gender: Male
  • He was a friend of mine.
    • Little Mountain Sound Archive
Re: Anyone heard of the Clara for HRTF?
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2006, 03:43:31 AM »
Pardon my ignorance, can someone point me to an HRTF educational page?  I'm completely unfamiliar with it.
Socks are overrated.

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Anyone heard of the Clara for HRTF?
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2006, 05:09:03 AM »
http://www.answers.com/topic/head-related-transfer-function


Pardon my ignorance, can someone point me to an HRTF educational page?  I'm completely unfamiliar with it.

Offline MattD

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
  • Gender: Male
Re: Anyone heard of the Clara for HRTF?
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2006, 10:22:44 AM »
Perhaps the ONLY saving feature for visitors is the amount of information (content) about recording available to those willing to put up with navigational confusion. 

Thankfully, enough people seem to overcome these shortcomings to find content worth the trouble.  Email comments about the site is well over 60% like it a lot (mostly for content), the others are put off (like is mentioned here) to dig much further exploring the content and product offerings.

You'll find that a lot of people are not willing to put up with navigational confusion. Your logic is flawed because you're talking about the subset of the population willing to email you, and as you admitted, they're mostly into the content. You're obviously very passionate about your design/techniques - why not put that same level of effort into creating a site that's more universally useful? That's just my $0.02. Take what you will from it.
Out of the game … for now?

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.063 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF