Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)  (Read 15118 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #45 on: January 10, 2009, 07:57:08 PM »
A few more 853 samples..I think the ass end is pretty decent on these...there're the only samples I can give.

http://www.collectiveunconscious.org/07arena0605.html

http://www.collectiveunconscious.org/07arena0701b.html

http://www.collectiveunconscious.org/07arena0703c.html









Offline hypnotoad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #46 on: January 10, 2009, 08:44:57 PM »
The samples were:

1. AT853
2. AT943
3. CA-14

Good analysis by Brian and I would think either the 853's or the CA-14's are very acceptable and comparable. Oh those 943's  :-X  I didn't like what I heard from them to my ears.

If someone was just entering the market and interchangable caps wasn't an issue, CA-14's would be a good pick. Need caps? 853's without question.  Anyone with the slim 943 bodies could get the adapters and 853 caps, would be a nice upgrade.

I'm really surprised that #2 (943's) sound was so far lower than the other two.  That's what threw me off when I listened the first time. When I've taped with the 853/943 mic caps back to back I've never had my 943s give off sound so much more down the scale.

In fact, I taped a two night show awhile back using the 853s for the first night, and then the 943s for the second night.  I ended up liking my first night tape better, as it had some deeper lows/bass on it.  Night #2 came out great too, but not enough on the deep in for my liking.

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #47 on: January 11, 2009, 12:20:19 PM »
One thing we all have to remember generally speaking the smaller the diaphragm the less bass a mic usually will have this rule especially applies to Cardioid mics.
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline taperwheeler

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 496
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #48 on: January 11, 2009, 07:17:14 PM »
So I checked and my sp-cmc-8 mics have the at933 bodies with the adapters and the 853 card caps.  Out of curiosity, would anyone have any input as to a comparison b/w the 853 and 943 omni's?
Mics: SP-CMC-8 AT933 Body 4.7K mod AT853 (c, sc) U853 (h) Microline Shotguns
Pres: CA 9100, SP-Preamp
Recorders: MT2 , Tascam DR-07, PCM-M10, PCM A10

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #49 on: January 11, 2009, 07:26:44 PM »
^I don't have the 853 omnis, otherwise I could do the comparison.
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

Offline Sunday Driver

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #50 on: January 11, 2009, 07:49:28 PM »
Chances are the phantom adaptor you will use will have a bass roll off on it.

I've never seen an Audio Technica phantom power module that had bass roll off and couldn't be turned off with a switch. Maybe that's a new product by Audio Technica.  ???
The Nady CBM-40T has no bass roll off and is even cheaper. In fact, sometimes I get too much bass to my liking with mine.
You either record it or it's gone forever.
My Tapes

Offline Javier Cinakowski

  • !! Downhill From Here !!
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4325
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #51 on: January 11, 2009, 07:59:57 PM »
I doubt the nady is better than the AT phantom adapter.  I have read the AT's use really nice tranformers in those adapters....
Neumann KM185mp OR DPA ST2015-> Grace Design Lunatec V2-> Tascam DR-100mkIII

Offline Sunday Driver

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #52 on: January 11, 2009, 08:06:13 PM »
I doubt the nady is better than the AT phantom adapter.  I have read the AT's use really nice tranformers in those adapters....

Their AT8531 "box" module is a POS- I'd be the first to admit that. The transformer inside looks similar to the ones you can get from digikey for about $2. When you use them on batter power, it changes the sound- the signal is more noisy and "flatter".
You either record it or it's gone forever.
My Tapes

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #53 on: January 11, 2009, 08:24:07 PM »
I have the 8532 phantom power modules/adaptors and the Nady cbm40s(used with a ps2). While the AT boxes do give you about 145 db of spl handling ability,yes..that much, they do not sound *nearly* as good as the Nadys/Denecke ,those giving you about 138db to work with. They do have a R/O, and it is switchable.
Like described above, they sound *extremely* flat.

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #54 on: January 11, 2009, 08:28:43 PM »
My point was that the Nadys sound a 1000% better.

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #55 on: January 11, 2009, 09:30:48 PM »
Chances are the phantom adaptor you will use will have a bass roll off on it.

I've never seen an Audio Technica phantom power module that had bass roll off and couldn't be turned off with a switch. Maybe that's a new product by Audio Technica.  ???
The Nady CBM-40T has no bass roll off and is even cheaper. In fact, sometimes I get too much bass to my liking with mine.

I would be willing to test a Nady vs an AT module if someone wants to send me them.

Chris
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #56 on: January 11, 2009, 09:38:50 PM »
I'm half tempted to just have you rebuild both boxes. They sound like ass as is, but the casings are sweet as hell.

Offline 69mako

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 645
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #57 on: January 11, 2009, 11:27:27 PM »
Belexes,
Thanks for the comp.  It's good to hear the sound of mics side-by-side.

Mako
http://db.etree.org/69mako

007: Church Audio CA-14c -> Church Audio St-9100 preamp -> R-09HR

Open: Busman BSC1 mics (X2) -> Hydra Cables (X2) -> Tmod R4

Offline Javier Cinakowski

  • !! Downhill From Here !!
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4325
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #58 on: January 12, 2009, 08:09:56 AM »
oh, were talking about the AT phantom/bat boxes than run on battery too?  I was thinking of the barrel shaped phantom adapters...
Neumann KM185mp OR DPA ST2015-> Grace Design Lunatec V2-> Tascam DR-100mkIII

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #59 on: January 12, 2009, 09:18:39 AM »
I don't know about the other type, I can only comment on the boxes, 8532s ( which will also serve as adaptors to an outside power source if need be). Crapola.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.103 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF