Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)  (Read 15160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« on: January 07, 2009, 09:57:20 PM »
I decided to do a comp of the CA14's, AT853's, and the AT943's. (all cardioids)

Loud music out of one home stereo speaker. X-Y mic config a few feet from a Klipsch Chorus II speaker.  Not scientific in the least, but better than nothing.

Mics > 9100 > Sony D50

I strung them all together into one file.

24 bit:
http://www.2shared.com/file/4601423/1d7404a8/mic_comp.html

I'll post what was what in a few days, Samples 1, 2 and 3. Guesses are welcome.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2009, 09:58:54 PM by Belexes »
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2009, 10:09:56 PM »
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2009, 11:10:16 PM »
How are the ATs wired? :P

Offline gossling

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2009, 11:38:46 PM »
Thanks for the comparison!

I'm not gonna guess which is which, but the second one is clearly the weakest, to my ears.  The first sounds sounds clearer to me than the third (especially the percussion), but the differences are subtle.  Any chance you could upload the original source? Or do the same test with the D-50's internal microphones for further comparison?

Thanks again
« Last Edit: January 08, 2009, 01:25:30 AM by gossling »

Offline Jeremy Lykins

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 931
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2009, 11:45:45 PM »
I agree that the second one is the weakest (please don't be the ca-14's).  The first and third sounded a lot alike to me.  I prefer the first source until the vocals start, but I like the third source better during the vocals. 

Offline willndmb

  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6792
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2009, 12:04:35 AM »
2nd is def the worst imo too
no where near enough listening to any of these mics to guess what might be what though
Mics - AKG ck61/ck63 (c480b & Naiant actives), SP-BMC-2
XLR Cables - Silver Path w/Darktrain stubbies
Interconnect Cables - Dogstar (XLR), Darktrain (RCA > 1/8) (1/8 > 1/8), and Kind Kables (1/8f > 1/4)
Preamps - Naiant Littlebox & Tinybox
Recorders - PCM-M10 & DR-60D

Offline hypnotoad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2009, 01:57:33 AM »
I'll take a stab at it...

a. AT853
b. CA14
c. AT943


Offline gossling

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2009, 02:14:34 AM »
OK, now I can't resist :P:
1. AT943
2. CA-14
3. AT843

Offline hypnotoad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2009, 02:29:44 AM »
I'm thinking the first set of mics was the 853s.  To my ears the bass was a tad more defined/deeper on the 1st set, and the overall sound was a bit more airy than the 3rd set of mics.

Well there it is.  That's the limb I'm climbing out on.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2009, 02:31:33 AM by hypnotoad »

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2009, 08:07:29 AM »
No one has gotten it right so far, but I do agree the 2nd is the weakest and there are only subtle differences between #1 and #3.
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #10 on: January 08, 2009, 09:05:23 AM »
I agree sample 2 sounds notably different from the other two samples.  It's also quieter.  Average RMS values for each sample:

(1)  Average RMS Power:   -22.69 dB   -22.42 dB
(2)  Average RMS Power:   -26.41 dB   -26.33 dB
(3)  Average RMS Power:   -22.7 dB   -22.45 dB

For my listening, I added +3.7/3.9 dB to sample 2's L/R channels to match the RMS with the other samples.  Sounded closer in loudness to me after doing so.

Sample 2 sounds significantly brighter to my ears, which I found grating fairly quickly -- I just stopped listening.  Dramatically different from the other samples.  As for the other two...

Sample 1 sounded more balanced and a bit darker to my ears than sample 3.  The HF seems a little more pronounced in sample 3 relative to sample 1 and to my ears shares a bit of the sample 2 character.  Sample 3's midrage also stood out a bit more for me, for example, the guitar.  I found sample 1's LF a bit looser and more robust, but not sloppy, while sample 3's was a little lighter and tighter.  God hates a coward, so even though I'm not familiar with any of these mics, I'll give it a go:

(1)  CA-14
(2)  AT943
(3)  AT853

All in all, I agree with others who found the differences between 1 and 3 subtle, and I'd be happy with either sample 1 or 3.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2009, 12:21:33 PM by Brian Skalinder »
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline Liquid Drum

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 661
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #11 on: January 08, 2009, 12:10:41 PM »
Sample 1 is best to me. Sample 2 is much quieter but also is very trebly.

I am guessin' sample 2 is the 943's (although I hope not lol).
Mics:
AT933/C

Batt-Boxes, Pre-amps:
CA-9100

Recorders:
Edirol R-09
iRiver H120 (CF Modded)
Sony MZ-RH910 Hi-MD

Video: Canon HV20 E

Offline hypnotoad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 261
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #12 on: January 08, 2009, 01:23:14 PM »
No one has gotten it right so far, but I do agree the 2nd is the weakest and there are only subtle differences between #1 and #3.

Really?  Interesting.  If that's the case I might have to raise #2 like Brian and re listen to everything.  I never thought of changing the audio.  

Edit - raised/relistened/and thought the sound of #2 ended up being closer to the others.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2009, 08:39:24 PM by hypnotoad »

Offline EarlyMorningRain

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #13 on: January 08, 2009, 01:32:07 PM »
if no one is correct yet, then I'll guess this

(1)  AT853
(2)  AT943
(3)  CA-14


Offline Jeremy Lykins

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 931
Re: CA14 vs AT853 vs AT943 (comp)
« Reply #14 on: January 08, 2009, 02:32:28 PM »
Sample 1 sounded more balanced and a bit darker to my ears than sample 3.  The HF seems a little more pronounced in sample 3 relative to sample 1 and to my ears shares a bit of the sample 2 character.  Sample 3's midrage also stood out a bit more for me, for example, the guitar.  I found sample 1's LF a bit looser and more robust, but not sloppy, while sample 3's was a little lighter and tighter.

That's exactly what I thought, but I didn't know how to say it. 

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.25 seconds with 41 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF