I agree sample 2 sounds notably different from the other two samples. It's also quieter. Average RMS values for each sample:
(1) Average RMS Power: -22.69 dB -22.42 dB
(2) Average RMS Power: -26.41 dB -26.33 dB
(3) Average RMS Power: -22.7 dB -22.45 dB
For my listening, I added +3.7/3.9 dB to sample 2's L/R channels to match the RMS with the other samples. Sounded closer in loudness to me after doing so.
Sample 2 sounds significantly brighter to my ears, which I found grating fairly quickly -- I just stopped listening. Dramatically different from the other samples. As for the other two...
Sample 1 sounded more balanced and a bit darker to my ears than sample 3. The HF seems a little more pronounced in sample 3 relative to sample 1 and to my ears shares a bit of the sample 2 character. Sample 3's midrage also stood out a bit more for me, for example, the guitar. I found sample 1's LF a bit looser and more robust, but not sloppy, while sample 3's was a little lighter and tighter. God hates a coward, so even though I'm not familiar with any of these mics, I'll give it a go:
(1) CA-14
(2) AT943
(3) AT853
All in all, I agree with others who found the differences between 1 and 3 subtle, and I'd be happy with either sample 1 or 3.