Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Poll

Which sample you like better and why?

I like sample A and think it is the DPAs
I like sample A and think it is the Nevatons
I like sample B and think it is the DPAs
I like sample B and think it is the Nevatons
They both suck!

Author Topic: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400  (Read 18843 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dbindc

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #15 on: August 09, 2011, 05:18:11 PM »
Have to think sample B is DPA mainly because it sounds a lot like the recordings of bluegrass acts I make with head mounted 4061's.

I liked the clarity of sample  A, but the high end was a bit grating and it seemed to be lacking in the 200-500 khz range.
Gefell M300, DPA 4022 and 4061
MBHO 603A/648 + KA200, KA500, KA100DK, KA400, KA800, K20, vintage MB omni & cardioid capsules under Peerless and Unitra brands  Audix SCX1  Josephson branded MBHO/Peerless 640
preamps and recorders SD MP2 Naiant Littlebox & Tinybox  Edirol R44  Sony M10 CA-Ugly

Offline illconditioned

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2997
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2011, 02:06:59 AM »
Something about sample A is bothering me.  Everything is there, detail and frequency range.  It just sounds "thin".  B sounds more "rich" if I could say that.  I would really need to listen more, but I find A to be not enjoyable.  My guess is that B is the Nevatons, but I could be wrong.

There are some other differences as well (EQ, position, etc), but in the end my question is, after listening to 90seconds, which did I enjoy more.  I kept forgetting A was music, listening for sounds, not  music or individual instruments.  I would suggest trying a longer sample, which sounds better after a whole song.

Finally, I think someone should do a comparison of mics side-by-side, on the same hat!  I did this comparing capsules in the past (not DPA vs Nevaton), and it is informative.

  Richard
« Last Edit: August 10, 2011, 02:14:56 AM by illconditioned »
Please DO NOT mail me with tech questions.  I will try to answer in the forums when I get a chance.  Thanks.

Sample recordings at: http://www.soundmann.com.

Offline JD

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1643
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2011, 03:14:17 AM »
Here are some longer samples from the headlining act, Seldom Scene.
I used the same sample letters with the same mics.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/sl9smo

http://www.sendspace.com/file/lzr9tq
Mics: DPA 4022, 4060; Nevaton MC51, MCE400; Gefell sms2000, m20, m21, m27
Pres: DPA MMA6000; Grace V2; Portico 5012; Sonosax SX-M2
Recorders: Edirol R09hr, Sound Devices 722

Offline illconditioned

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2997
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2011, 03:35:59 AM »
Here are some longer samples from the headlining act, Seldom Scene.
I used the same sample letters with the same mics.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/sl9smo

http://www.sendspace.com/file/lzr9tq
Wow, that's a great clip!  Sounds like you're getting a lot of direct (acoustic) sound.  Did they come out to the audience or something?
OK, I have a strong preference for B over A again.

  Richard
Please DO NOT mail me with tech questions.  I will try to answer in the forums when I get a chance.  Thanks.

Sample recordings at: http://www.soundmann.com.

Offline nicegrin

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 187
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2011, 01:21:37 PM »
I´d say B is the DPAs. It sounds more open, has fuller bass and not the same high end bump as the Nevatons.
I also guess the Nevatons are more directional than the dpas. Atleast comparing these 2 clips A sounds more directional.
I Usually prefer Nevaton to DPAs though...

N.

Toy Box:

MICS:

Omnis:  6xNevaton MCE400s, Countryman b3s (modded), MM HLSOs (4.7K mod), Aevox in ear MK2s, CA-11s
Cards:   Schoeps MK4s with Schoeps CMRS, Milab VM-44 Links, SP CMC-8,  AT853, Sennheiser MKE 104, MM HLSC-1s, ECM-717
Hypers: AKG CK93s (modded), SP CMC-8, AT853, Audix 1280s (Church actives).


INBETWEEN: Naiant Tinybox (CMR mod), Naiant Tinybox (p48 mod), Naiant PFA, CA-9100, CA Ugly, Denecke PS-2 mini, MM-MBM, MM-CBM, SP SPSB-8, custom nuetrik XLR to TRS cables, 5 pin to 5 pin extension cable. 

DECKS: A10, M10, R05, Tascam DR-05, R09-HR , MT2, Sharp MS-H702, MZ-R 70.

Offline JD

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1643
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #20 on: August 10, 2011, 01:29:52 PM »
I expected mics "B" to be the most preferred here, but I am kind of surprised how its evenly split it is as to which mics they are. ;D

I'll identify the samples this coming weekend. If you really want to know in the meantime, send a PM.
Mics: DPA 4022, 4060; Nevaton MC51, MCE400; Gefell sms2000, m20, m21, m27
Pres: DPA MMA6000; Grace V2; Portico 5012; Sonosax SX-M2
Recorders: Edirol R09hr, Sound Devices 722

Offline newplanet7

  • Hasn't heard a muddy 460/480 tape. EVER. Mike Hawk
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3530
  • Gender: Male
  • The Place To Be...... Akustische u. Kino-Geräte
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #21 on: August 10, 2011, 08:00:18 PM »
Ok JD. Your comp, your mics..... which do you prefer?   >:D

-todd
MILAB VM-44 Classic~> Silver T's~> Busman PMD660
News From Phish: Will tour as opening act for Widespread Panic for Summer
hahaha never happen, PHiSH is waaaaayyyy better the WSP

They both ain't got nothing on MMW... Money spent wisely if you ask me...


FYI, it is a kick ass recording of a bunch of pretend-a-hippies talking.

Offline JD

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1643
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #22 on: August 10, 2011, 11:51:34 PM »
Ok JD. Your comp, your mics..... which do you prefer?   >:D

-todd

I am happy with them both, but overall I prefer sample B.
I think it is just more pleasent to listen too. Something in A just sounds slightly off to me. I hear it mostly on some of the banjo notes and in the tail-end of her voice at times.
Sample B sounds more open and more life-like to me.
jd
Mics: DPA 4022, 4060; Nevaton MC51, MCE400; Gefell sms2000, m20, m21, m27
Pres: DPA MMA6000; Grace V2; Portico 5012; Sonosax SX-M2
Recorders: Edirol R09hr, Sound Devices 722

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #23 on: August 11, 2011, 08:48:44 AM »
B is much brighter, which given what I know of my 4061s and their 'soft boost' grids suggests that it's them.  I also feel like there's more air around the vocals on b and the other instruments are more pronounced.  The bass is more pronounced, although pleasantly rendered, in A - in fact I'd say I prefer it and that B is verging on thin.  But otherwise I think B is much better.  I could also see people saying B has that "harshness" that people accuse the 406x of, and that A is "smoother" (a characteristic I normally associate with DPA, but not with the 4061). 

Listening on Macbook Pro>Fubar IV Plus DAC/Amp>ATH M50s.
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline TNJazz

  • Ninja
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Gender: Male
  • "Those who know, know."
    • NINJA DYNAMITE
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #24 on: August 11, 2011, 11:07:16 AM »
Overall I preferred the openness of B, although the clarity of A was excellent.  It just sounded a little "pinched" and narrow.  Both have their strengths and weaknesses.

I won't say anything more because I already know which is which.   >:D
Check out my band!  --> http://www.ninjadynamite.com

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #25 on: August 11, 2011, 01:10:13 PM »
I have no guess as to which pair is which.

I liked B for the openness. Sample A sounded congested and not as real on Sennheiser HD 280 headphones.

Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline SmokinJoe

  • Trade Count: (63)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Gender: Male
  • "75 and sunny"... life is so much simpler.
    • uploads to archive.org
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #26 on: August 11, 2011, 11:51:44 PM »
I have no guess as to which pair is which.

I liked B for the openness. Sample A sounded congested and not as real on Sennheiser HD 280 headphones.

Bingo.  Same cans too.

On the poll I had to choose something so I said B is the Nevatons just because I recall seeing the curve and it had a big presence hump.  Not as big as DPA with the high grids, but I assume the DPAs are running flat, no grids.
Mics: Schoeps MK4 & CMC5's / Gefell M200's & M210's / ADK-TL / DPA4061's
Pres: V3 / ST9100
Decks: Oade Concert Mod R4Pro / R09 / R05
Photo: Nikon D700's, 2.8 Zooms, and Zeiss primes
Playback: Raspberry Pi > Modi2 Uber > Magni2 > HD650

Online aaronji

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3884
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #27 on: August 12, 2011, 08:34:08 AM »
^^^ I was curious about the grids too.  Soft boost?  No grid at all? 

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #28 on: August 12, 2011, 09:13:21 AM »
Here are some longer samples from the headlining act, Seldom Scene.
I used the same sample letters with the same mics.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/sl9smo

http://www.sendspace.com/file/lzr9tq

I was unable to download the comp because I keep getting a video codec download page popping up.  Is there any chance that you could post this here:
 

http://iput.it/about


A free site without the annoying ads.

I own dpa 4061's & the mce400's and I would love to hear your comp.


hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

Offline Fatah Ruark (aka MIKE B)

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9945
  • Gender: Male
  • I dream in beige.
    • sloppy.art.ink
Re: Mic Comp: DPA4060 vs. Nevaton MCE400
« Reply #29 on: August 12, 2011, 09:48:46 AM »
||| MICS:  Beyer CK930 | DPA 4022 | DPA 4080 | Nevaton MCE400 | Sennheiser Ambeo Headset |||
||| PREAMPS: DPA d:vice | Naiant Tinybox | Naiant IPA |||
||| DECKS: Sound Devices MixPre6 | iPod Touch 32GB |||
|||Concert History || LMA Recordings || Live YouTube |||

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF