Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Shock Mounts  (Read 2586 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Shock Mounts
« on: December 09, 2004, 12:44:18 PM »
Has anybody ever noticed a difference in the performance of the various shock mounts available?
I've always used the AT8410a's, but I have the ones that came with my Studio Projects C4's. The C4 shock mounts are lower profile. I was thinking about starting to use them. The suspension is stiffer on the SP mounts. I just wonder if my recordings will suffer using them instead of the AT mounts.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline Scooter

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Shock Mounts
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2004, 12:48:16 PM »
they def don't provide as much iso as the 8410's.  I did exactly this when I had my C4's.  The ones that come w/ the C4's are way lower profile.  I didn't notice anything different in my recordings.  I eventually went with the Sony a53??? mounts.  They work AWESOME, and they are lower pro than the 8410's.
MBHO 603a(ka200n/ka500hn) >
R-44, or H120

LMA Recordings

Offline dnsacks

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1640
Re: Shock Mounts
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2004, 12:50:30 PM »
try running both mics in a stereo configuration in a controlled/quiet environment, with one mic in the at shockmount, the other in the sp shockmount and see which better isolates taps on the stand, etc.

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: Shock Mounts
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2004, 12:54:34 PM »
try running both mics in a stereo configuration in a controlled/quiet environment, with one mic in the at shockmount, the other in the sp shockmount and see which better isolates taps on the stand, etc.

I'll try this. Thanks +T
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: Shock Mounts
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2004, 12:56:20 PM »
I might try putting lighter tension bands on the SP shock mounts too.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline muj

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1544
  • Gender: Male
  • Certifiable Nevaton Fluffer
Re: Shock Mounts
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2004, 01:08:40 PM »
i really dig the gefell eh93,shure a53 and the josephson elastomer shock mount.

pricy tho... ;D

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: Shock Mounts
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2004, 01:21:39 PM »
Does the A53M provide as much isolation as the AT8410a?

I've seen them used a lot, I always figured the AT shocks were better.  ???
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline Chanher

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1382
  • Colorado Crew
Re: Shock Mounts
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2004, 01:34:35 PM »
try running both mics in a stereo configuration in a controlled/quiet environment, with one mic in the at shockmount, the other in the sp shockmount and see which better isolates taps on the stand, etc.

I'll try this. Thanks +T

let us know about the results, I had the exact same question(s)
Line Audio CM4 / AT853Rx (c,h,o) / Studio Projects C4 MKII (c,h,o)
Sound Devices MP-2 / bm2p+ Edirol UA-5
Zoom F3 / F6 / Marantz Oade Warm Mod PMD661 / Tascam DR-70D

Offline Scooter

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Shock Mounts
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2004, 03:23:27 PM »
Does the A53M provide as much isolation as the AT8410a?

I've seen them used a lot, I always figured the AT shocks were better.  ???

the AT's have more iso than the Shure's, but I would think that the shure's have more than the C4 mounts.  Don't have the C4 mounts anymore, or I'd test them myself...  It's a trade-off, less isolation for more low-pro.
MBHO 603a(ka200n/ka500hn) >
R-44, or H120

LMA Recordings

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.087 seconds with 33 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF