Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: What went wrong here?  (Read 7505 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Macpono

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Gender: Male
What went wrong here?
« on: August 05, 2009, 02:32:56 AM »
hey guys,

i am totally pi**** :(
went to see u2 in gelsenkirchen 2 nites ago and probably had the sweetest spot in the entire arena for taping with a crystal clear sound! sat first row on the left hand side of the stage, right in front of the pa with nobody around me. never had a better position than this one but for some heck of a reason my tape fu**** up and i do not understand why it happend??

my rig looked like this: at853-sonosax-r09hr
recorded in: 88/24
limiter: off
low cut: off
mic gain: low
LF Cut (sonosax): off

transfered the file in audacity and it looks like this:



i have tested my rig today with exactly the same configuration as shown above and i see perfect levels on the edirol!
during the show i thought that there must have been a limiter switched on by incident as the levels were crappy but this was not the case when i checked the configuration (sonosax and edirol) after the show?!

i will upload a short soundfile so you can get an idea of the tape :(

--> http://www.newmini-technik.de/images/u2.mp3

any thoughts would be great!!!

thank you so much

alex
« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 09:13:33 AM by Macpono »
iso: a set of Neumann KM140's

Offline DaveG73

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 559
  • Gender: Male
  • Beer and Music.
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2009, 01:32:55 PM »
Not really up with the gear used but my first thought is batteries.

I had a recording where my battery crapped out halfway through that resembled that in audacity. I would be willing to bet on it, but you may want to wait on other opinions.

Only alternative is that your levels were WAY low. I assume you have some reasonable experience given the way you "talk" so I would guess this is not the case.

Dave.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 01:35:47 PM by DaveG73 »
Always Taping Under The Influence.

I was under the assumption that as a taper, we're all geeks?  I just thought it went with the territory?

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2009, 03:29:41 PM »
hey guys,

i am totally pi**** :(
went to see u2 in gelsenkirchen 2 nites ago and probably had the sweetest spot in the entire arena for taping with a crystal clear sound! sat first row on the left hand side of the stage, right in front of the pa with nobody around me. never had a better position than this one but for some heck of a reason my tape fu**** up and i do not understand why it happend??

my rig looked like this: at853-sonosax-r09hr
recorded in: 88/24
limiter: off
low cut: off
mic gain: low
LF Cut (sonosax): off

transfered the file in audacity and it looks like this:



i have tested my rig today with exactly the same configuration as shown above and i see perfect levels on the edirol!
during the show i thought that there must have been a limiter switched on by incident as the levels were crappy but this was not the case when i checked the configuration (sonosax and edirol) after the show?!

i will upload a short soundfile so you can get an idea of the tape :(

--> http://www.newmini-technik.de/images/u2.mp3

any thoughts would be great!!!

thank you so much

alex

Could be the limiter - I always cover that with black electrical tape. 

Seems a bit obvious, but I'd at least also try raising your levels in post - they are WAY low but maybe it sounds a bit better if you raise them?  It was hard to tell (at least on my speakers at work) how messed up the recording is because of how low the levels are.

I'm also a touch unclear why you're running a Sonosax with an R-09HR and AT853s.  I'm not aware of anything specifically *wrong* with this config but it is at least not a common one, I don't think.  I would assume the Sonosax uses a lot more power putting out 48v phantom than most small pres like the CA-9100 or the various battery boxes made by Church and Sound Pros do... 
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2009, 03:50:37 PM »
Can you redo the screenshot after changing the waveform scale to dB?  (Just right-click the 0.0 - 1.0 scale and select the dB option.)
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline Teen Age Riot

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 895
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2009, 05:02:15 PM »
Did you guys listen to the sample?
Low levels are not the only problem. There's also a ton of noise that drowns out the music.
Questions to the OP: Where did you set the levels, both on the Sonosax and the Edirol? Did you raise the volume in post?

I suspect something went wrong early in the chain, resulting in very low levels. You then tried to compensate that by turning the gain *way* up, but all you got was the amplified noise floor from the pre-amp and/or the mics with a little bit of music somehow coming through.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2009, 05:31:31 PM »
Did you guys listen to the sample?

Oooo...just listened.  Yeah, definitely not just a low level issue.  The noise I'm hearing is much too loud and of the wrong character compared to what I've heard from mic/preamp self-noise before (this is more of a buzz than the hiss with which I'm familiar).

When you tested the gear and achieved good results...was everything exactly the same?  Same settings, same cables, same batteries, etc.?
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline George

  • May the schwartz be with you!
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4521
  • Gender: Male
  • Unofficial TS thread killer
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2009, 05:58:01 PM »
Kinda sounds like the cable(s) didn't properly sit in the jacks. 
SP-CMC-4s (C, H, SC terminated to mini xlr)>Tinybox>Sony M10/Tascam DR-2d
Countryman B3 (Omni, mini xlr)>Tinybox>Sony M10/Tascam DR-2d
Audix 1200 series cable from Chris Church, pair of Audix M1280 card capsules

Listening: Oppo 980HD>Yamaha RXV667>Rega R1's + Rega RS VOX + Rega R5S's

"Every time I see a group of teenagers gathered around an iphone laughing at some youtube video, I walk up to them, slap the iphone out of their hand, get right up to them nose to nose, and scream at the top of my lungs:

TAKE A LOOK

IT'S IN A BOOK

READING FUCKING RAINBOW."

Offline Macpono

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2009, 02:42:47 AM »
Can you redo the screenshot after changing the waveform scale to dB?  (Just right-click the 0.0 - 1.0 scale and select the dB option.)

hey brian,

here you go:

iso: a set of Neumann KM140's

Offline Macpono

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #8 on: August 06, 2009, 02:44:33 AM »
Kinda sounds like the cable(s) didn't properly sit in the jacks. 

hi!

cables were connected 100%!
have checked that after i had recognized the "problem" when i tested the levels during the support act.

cheers

alex
iso: a set of Neumann KM140's

Offline Macpono

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #9 on: August 06, 2009, 02:46:37 AM »

When you tested the gear and achieved good results...was everything exactly the same?  Same settings, same cables, same batteries, etc.?

hi!

i have tested the gear with the exact same settings, so, same batteries, cables and so on!

alex
iso: a set of Neumann KM140's

Offline Macpono

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #10 on: August 06, 2009, 02:47:47 AM »
Not really up with the gear used but my first thought is batteries.

hey dave,

batteries were 100% healthy and new/fully charged!
iso: a set of Neumann KM140's

Offline Macpono

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #11 on: August 06, 2009, 02:55:06 AM »
Questions to the OP: Where did you set the levels, both on the Sonosax and the Edirol? Did you raise the volume in post?

hi!

the levels on the edirol were at 65 and on the sonosax at 50% (both channels), though it doesnt really make any difference whether the sonosax levels are set on 50 or 90% - it will/does not make the signal any louder.

alex
iso: a set of Neumann KM140's

Offline bgreen

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 611
  • Gender: Male
  • Live music taper and archivist
    • Live Music Preservation Project
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #12 on: August 06, 2009, 07:43:05 AM »
It wouldn't be some sort of RF interference would it? I mean, it's hard to believe that it would continue the whole show, but I have had some sections where a doofus with a cell phone was talking next to me and it effed up my recordings, similiar buzzing noise. Could this be from something on stage maybe? It's certainly a long shot, but I wouldn't know what else would cause that noise. Just guessing of course, it's really hard to tell.

Offline setboy

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5117
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #13 on: August 06, 2009, 08:02:56 AM »
my guess would be some kind of interference coming from something.

Offline powermonkey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1058
  • Gender: Male
Re: What went wrong here?
« Reply #14 on: August 06, 2009, 08:50:37 AM »
my guess would be some kind of interference coming from something.

Maybe U2 have some kind of cunning anti-taping device? Far fetched, but I'm sure stranger things have happened.
Church Audio CA-11s, CA-14 Cards, CA-14 Omnis, Peluso CEMC-6

CA 9200 preamp
FEL BMA-1 Preamp



Edirol R09
Edirol R09HR
Sony M10
Edirol R44

My live recordings.... HERE:

https://www.facebook.com/Liverecordings1

and/or

https://soundcloud.com/liverecordings-1

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF