Taperssection.com
Gear / Technical Help => Recording Gear => Topic started by: Jhurlbs81 on May 28, 2015, 03:23:02 PM
-
Aside from the Microtrack, are there any other handheld recorders that support SPDIF? I'm considering adding an AD2K back into my chain, and would need to replace my M-10. I first looked at the D-50, but it is optical, not SPDIF. Larger all-in-ones are out of the questions since I already have a tube power supply and V2. Need to keep it small.
Thanks,
Jesse
-
I think the TASCAM DR-100ii has it - but you have to ask around about compatibility with your A>D...some of these newer recorders don't play well with older gear...
-
Not exactly "hand-held", but the PMD-661 has SPDIF input...
Terry
-
A technicality you may be aware of, but 'optical' is the same SPDIF signal data transmitted via toslink rather than a wired coax connection.
You might look into using a coax/optical SPDIF converter between the AD2K and D-50. Not sure how well that works, but converters are small and inexpensive and it might fit better in the bag than the obvious route of going to a larger recorder with a coax SPDIF input (R44, PMD661,670,671, FR2, HD-P2, DR680, etc) I've never used a converter and have no idea how reliable they are. Although small this does introduce an extra set of connections and something else to power.
What about the Tascam DR110mk2, it's large handheld size and has a wired SPDIF input on a minijack. Not sure how well it works or if it works with the AD2K.
(some redundancy here, others posted while I was responding and got distracted)
-
The Sony PCM-D100 (and D-50) also has a digital input.
-
When I had both the D50 and D100 neither would take a signal from the Hosa ODL-312 ( AES>Optical ). I have a PMD-661 and it takes a signal from a SBM-1. Hoping it will take one from my AD1000--waiting on power cables. I need to see pics when someone talks about comparison of sizes. Here are three of the M10 and the PMD-661.
-
Jesse, this may be off base but I don't see how adding an AD2K is keeping it small? Why not go with the DR680 at that point? You'd have the additional channels to run the Tubes & Schoeps at the same time. Plus I question how much better the AD2K is vs today's ADC chips in the full size decks never mind the additional weight of the battery to power it. For me at least, spending money on ANY 2 channel deck isn't worth it unless I want something small to fit in say a fanny pack for low profile situations & as you know that isn't happening with the Tubes or an AD2K. I'd save the M10 for the low pro Schoeps rig & run a full size deck that has multi channel when I'm running the big guns & multiple mics. Plus the microphones effect the overall sound more than a deck, preamp or convertor. Again, all this is in my opinion & YMMV....
-
Hey Carl-
Thanks for your thoughts. When I said keep it small, all I was saying is the bag is already full between the toob power supply, the V2 and cables, etc. I don't have room for a full size deck. I LOVE the AD2k sound and the metering is the best I've ever used. I wish other decks and gear used the "peak hold" for meters. I probably won't move on this. Honestly, I bought my V2 back in the fall and still haven't used it. :-\
I agree, the mics and pre are a much bigger percentage of your sound than the AD, but I still lust after the AD2K and believe it to be superior to converters that come in consumer decks.
Maybe I will take your advice though and pick up a d-70 instead so I can run both rigs at the same time or take a board feed.
-
Jesse, I agree with you since I'd like to think the AD2K is superior but my point was just that I don't know how much of a real benefit beyond "perceived" improvement there is but to your point the metering is superior & the latest generation of Tascam decks has horrible metering in my opinion.
The DR-70 is amazingly small for its size considering its four channels & would allow you to run two sets of mics or take a board feed, very handy in a lot of the venues I record in. For the price I don't think it can be beat & again in my opinion a much better investment than a two channel deck. The performance of these newest decks are amazing considering the price points vs just a few years ago when we first started taping.
Now, get out there & use that V2 will ya ;D
-
haha. I will. You convinced me to run the telefunkens at Jay Peak, so it will be the V2's maiden voyage. ;D
-
God we are soooo spoiled. I was just listening to 9.3 85 GD taped by the Oades. How'd you like to lug this and a car battery around, and keep it lo pro? Makes a 661 with internal batteries seem tiny.
http://audioidiots.com/Sony/catalogi/1984%20digital%20DE/groot/p014i1.jpg
-
Old PCM-Beta setups make DAT look glourious -> esp when you consider you needed Car/Motorcycle Batteries to run for longer periods of time
Old DAT setups make New PCM/DSD recorders look glourious -> in the 90-mid 2000's SLA's (or Gel Cell's as they where called back then) when the one's most of use used.
I remember my bag with 3 SLA's an AD1k and DA-P1 among other gear and having to lug it all over the place - real PITA - at least it only took myself - back in the 80's these PCM setups took teams of people to get in and run.
-
I used to think an m1 was the best thing ever because of the size, even while lugging a preamp and adc around. Now at the size of what, a Denon dat recorder or a little bigger than a d8, a modified 661 or 70d offers high quality preamp and adc and xlr inputs? Crazy.
-
We've all been doing this way too long, we sound like a bunch of old farts :P
Edit - for the record I am an old fart & I don't miss multiple SLA's in my bag...
-
Yep.....and I didn't even mention how cool the sizes of the d6 and d3 were after the d5....... :P
-
Yep.....and I didn't even mention how cool the sizes of the d6 and d3 were after the d5....... :P
nor how small the D5 was compared to a Nak 550
-
We
Be
Old