Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: if you mix 2 audience sources....  (Read 2326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline heyitsmejess

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1208
  • Gender: Male
if you mix 2 audience sources....
« on: June 22, 2008, 04:37:46 PM »
is it called a matrix?  or is it a "4 mic mix"?  or is it something else?
cause we zig and zag between good and bad
stumble and fall on right and wrong


http://www.rumpkemountainboys.org/

Offline leehookem

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • Gender: Male
    • Texas Tapers
Re: if you mix 2 audience sources....
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2008, 04:44:46 PM »
is it called a matrix?  or is it a "4 mic mix"? 

both are correct.
www.texastapers.org


AKG c480b ck61/ck63 > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
AKG ck61/63 > NBob Actives > Naiant PFA > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
Audiophile 2496 > Mytek Stereo96 DAC > Sony MDR-7506
Dual 1229 > Marantz 2270 > Kimber Kables > Cerwin Vega VS120

Canon Rebel XSi, EF 50 mm f/1.8, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Offline -Q-

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 629
  • Gender: Male
Re: if you mix 2 audience sources....
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2008, 07:17:39 PM »
wast of time comes to mind. i never could understand why people do this. i have yet to hear 2 aud sources mixed together that sounded any better
I  don't know where i'm going but i'll get there.Reid Genauer

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: if you mix 2 audience sources....
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2008, 11:28:41 PM »
wast of time comes to mind. i never could understand why people do this. i have yet to hear 2 aud sources mixed together that sounded any better

One thing that I've noticed is that sources which are recorded coincident (and are of generally different pickup patterns) for matrix purposes generally fair better. I won't say they are necessarily better overall, but for matrices, they seem to be better on average, YMMV. For example, 2x shotguns and an omni which are all recorded vertically coincident.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline morst

  • I think I found an error on the internet; #UnionStrong
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5988
Re: if you mix 2 audience sources....
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2008, 10:35:52 AM »
wast of time comes to mind. i never could understand why people do this. i have yet to hear 2 aud sources mixed together that sounded any better

Unless each has advantages over the other in some way, I would tend to agree with this statement. Now, if one has good clarity on the vocals and the other has smooth, rich bass, then perhaps the low-end could be rolled off the one with the good vocals, and the high end rolled off the one with the good bass, and a decent mix made. But really, I tend to agree with waste of time, unless you're just doing it to waste time!!?!  ;D
https://toad.social/@morst spoutible.com/morst post.news/@acffhmorst

Offline wilsonedits

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 183
Re: if you mix 2 audience sources....
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2008, 10:00:49 PM »
wast of time comes to mind.


exactly and most of the time it seems to be people with really shitty equipment... that think for some reason mixing together will make it better
P2 yo

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: if you mix 2 audience sources....
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2008, 04:10:08 PM »
Sometimes,and it sounds stupid, people will do this and not release the two primary sources independently. They do this to..uh..basically to screw with people (collectors)
This is not overly common,but I have seen it done before.
But,yes..generally its a waste of time basically.

Offline boojum

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Gender: Male
Re: if you mix 2 audience sources....
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2008, 07:20:36 PM »
wast of time comes to mind. i never could understand why people do this. i have yet to hear 2 aud sources mixed together that sounded any better

Depends.  I record stuff now running a Mid-Side flanked by two omni's in a Williams array.  The MS gives me the clarity I want with good location of the instruments/performers with the omni's giving more of the room sound.  I am working on just such a mix now of a classical trio, some opera exceprts and some selections from Bernstein's Candide.  I have to back out the omni's a bit but they do add something to the mix.  I tested it by turning off fhe omni's entirely and i did not like it as much. 

In the Williams array the omni's are about 14" apart with the MS between them. 

John Eargle recommends recording orchestral performances with ORTF in the center and omni's at either edge.  It is simpler for me to use the Williams spacings and with, I think, just as good effect.
Nov schmoz kapop.

Offline KLowe

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
  • Gender: Male
  • CrossFit....check you ego at the door
Re: if you mix 2 audience sources....
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2008, 07:56:14 PM »
I've had great results with a M/S or blumlein in the middle with NOS subcards where the mixed source is consistently better than the individual sources.  All mics were in the same vertical plane.

YMMV...........
I actually work for a living with music, instead of you jerk offs who wish they did.

bwaaaahahahahahaha.... that is awesome!

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 38 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF