Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Archos Gmini 120  (Read 69744 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #90 on: January 15, 2004, 08:03:15 PM »
Jason - a few things:

[1]  Do the EAC WAV compare, anyway.  I encountered some apparent visual differences between my two recording sources (though not as extreme as yours), but the WAV compare showed they were bit perfect.

[2]  Assuming you're using the AES1 output, confirm your AES/EBU output from the V3 is set to a consumer signal, not pro.  

[3]  Try repeating the test but switching the outputs, i.e. V3 AES1 > impedance converter > Gmini and V3 S/PDIF coax > WT2496 > CE2K.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #91 on: January 15, 2004, 09:19:47 PM »
thanks for the suggestions guys.  obviously, my testing isn't done yet.

Brian,
I just went to try the EAC wave compare, and it said that it wouldn't let me.  my initial 20 minute test was at 48kHz, and EAC said it would only compare 44.1kHz files.  also, a thought I just had, was to generate .md5 files for both the .wav files.  if the .wav files were exactly the same, in theory, the .md5 files should be identical.  When I did this, I got two different .md5 files :(   and I am using the AES1 output, and I am 100% positive that it is set to a consumer signal.


so, here's a list of the tests I will do.  at first, they will al be 20 minute tests.  if any one is successful, I'll run a longer test.

(1) run the same test, but record at 44.1 kHz

(2) Switch the outputs of the V3, so the AES goes to the Gmini, and the RCA S/PDIF goes to the WT2496.

(3) I'll record a 20minute mp3 file, and listen to it for spikes and glitches.


so, anyone have other testing suggestions?

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #92 on: January 15, 2004, 10:14:40 PM »
I've now completed the same 20 minute test, this time at 44.1kHz
I basically had the same disappointing results.  this time, I went ahead, inverted one of the files, and mixed with the other.  each spike represents a glitch.  the second image is a close up of one of the spikes.  as you can see, everything is dead-flat, 0dB, except for one misplaced sample.  at least the thing is not resampling everything.  it is bit-accurate, except for these misplaced samples.





the nest step is to run a 20-minute test, with the AES out going to the gmini, and the RCA going to the computer.  here we go...

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #93 on: January 15, 2004, 10:23:55 PM »
oh, and here's one more pic.  because test #2 was done at 44.1 kHz, I was able to run EAC .wav compare tool.  this is the result:

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #94 on: January 15, 2004, 11:11:21 PM »
so I reversed the digital outputs from the V3, and ran a 20 minute test.  This time the AES went through the impedance transformer to the Gmini, and the RCA S/PDIF went out to the Waveterminal 2496 to be recorded by Cool Edit 2000.  No luck.  same deal, with glitches ranging from a few times a minute to every few minutes.  this will be my last test of the night, maybe I can do some more this weekend, although, at this point, it doesn't look too promising.


Offline greenone

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9273
  • Gender: Male
  • Russian mics... strong like bull...
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #95 on: January 15, 2004, 11:41:55 PM »
Hmph. Well, that's disappointing, to say the least. Not that it matters, but are these glitches audible?

I wonder if this is something they'd consider working on for future firmware updates - I seem to remember that the JB3's bit-accuracy improved over several updates, but that could just be wishful thinking on my part. :(

--Dave
Unofficial Blues Traveler archivist - glad to work on any BT or related recordings
archive.org admin - happy to upload tracked material to the LMA

Offline Nick in Edinboro

  • Wishes he was fishing right now...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2924
  • Gender: Male
  • Toshiba SD3690 > HK AR-20 > B&K ST-140 > Axiom M22
    • moepics.com - share your shots of moe.
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #96 on: January 15, 2004, 11:45:26 PM »
I wonder if this is something they'd consider working on for future firmware updates - I seem to remember that the JB3's bit-accuracy improved over several updates, but that could just be wishful thinking on my part. :(

I'm kinda wondering the same thing.. Also curious how it'd handle a different A/D, Jason--have you tried giving it a signal from your Waveterminal?  Not sure if it has coax out or what have you...

Maybe they can get tweak it via the firmware if we provide enough interest or something...
Oktava MC012's (dorseymod) > UA-5 (digmod) > JB3
http://braintuba.no-ip.com

Offline timP

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3537
  • Gender: Male
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #97 on: January 16, 2004, 01:37:31 AM »
wonder if it is making the spikes when the HD is saving the music? could it be a bleed over from the whir of the drive?
I have heard on iriver forums where people did similar test with it and had spikes and such every 30 seconds or so and longer evry  60 seconds...just a thought...
?>FR2LE

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #98 on: January 16, 2004, 06:06:03 AM »
spreadahead:
I've thought the same thing myself.  but the glitches seem to appear at random intervals, so I don't think that's it.
Also, have you experienced that?  I know you're going analog in, but if the glitches happen because the harddrive is writing, it shoudl probably happen regardless of whether you go analong in or digital in.

Quote
Hmph. Well, that's disappointing, to say the least. Not that it matters, but are these glitches audible?

I wonder if this is something they'd consider working on for future firmware updates
yes, they are audible, and sound like small clicks.
and it would be nice if a firmware upgrade is all that it takes.  perhaps not even a full firmware upgrade, but an upgrade to the recording plug-in?  I'm going to get in touch with their tech support and see what happens, but I know by email, it will take at least 2 or 3 days to get any response.  and I think if I'm going to try to get them to fix this and release a firmware upgrade, than I'll probably have to be in touch with someone a little higher up than the folks who have been answering my emails...
« Last Edit: January 16, 2004, 06:10:15 AM by JasonSobel »

Offline rustoleum

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1015
  • Gender: Male
  • AKG 481s->MiaGi IIs->MiniMe->MTII
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #99 on: January 16, 2004, 09:04:51 AM »
I just picked one  of these up last night and plan on doing some testing this weekend.  I've got 14 days to decide to return it so I should have some results pretty quickly.  

I'll be running my MiniMe's USB into a Vaio and the SPDIF into the 120.  I plan on starting at 16/44.1 and moving up from there.  Jason's comment about seeing the 120 lock onto a 48 khz singal from the V3 is very intriguing to me.  Great work, so far!

Keeping the fingers crossed as I'd love to have an option other than lugging a laptop from show to show.

more to come.
Rusty

Offline greenone

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9273
  • Gender: Male
  • Russian mics... strong like bull...
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #100 on: January 16, 2004, 09:59:23 AM »
Boy, now I feel like I should pick one up anyway just to have everyone in Massachusetts testing one (no offense, spread ;) )...

--Dave
Unofficial Blues Traveler archivist - glad to work on any BT or related recordings
archive.org admin - happy to upload tracked material to the LMA

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #101 on: January 16, 2004, 10:14:32 AM »
This morning, I also sent an email to their tech support, with details about my testing and what I have found.  I asked them if it could be fixed with a firmware upgrade or an upgrade to their recording plug-in.  I also offered to help test any future firmware upgrades that may fix this issue.  we'll see how they respond and what happens.

Rusty, please post your results here.

I ave tried send it these signals:
16/44.1, 16/48, 16/96, 24/48, and 24/96.

it won't sync when I send it a 96 kHz signal.  with the 16/48, it says it's recording 48khz, and it plays back correctly. and with 24/48, it will lock onto the 48kHz signal, but it says that the recording bit-rate is the same as when I send a 16/48 signal, so I'm assuming that it would just truncate the 24bit data down to 16.  I haven't tested this yet, however.

Offline rustoleum

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1015
  • Gender: Male
  • AKG 481s->MiaGi IIs->MiniMe->MTII
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #102 on: January 16, 2004, 10:56:06 AM »
For the 24 bit testing WaveLab's Bit Meter is a great way to see which bits are actually set.  You'll want to turn on the mode that lights the bits based on the amplification (intuitive mode, maybe?  can't remember and I'm at work now so I can't check).

and I will definately post my findings.

Rusty

Offline seethreepo

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
  • Gender: Male
  • Resist Or Serve
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #103 on: January 16, 2004, 12:34:41 PM »
can someone test the analog  \ line in  method of recording ,   I wouldnt mind the digital drwbacks if it takes a 16\ 48k  or 16 \ 44.1
via line in with no glitches.   also some feedback on the level meters...

thanks in advance  
& plus "t's" in spirit.  

"Never heard anyone say that music was the thing that fucked up their day" 
-Chris Robinson 1996-09-24
Mics:Schoeps Mk4,   Beyerdynamic ck930(for sale)  ,Sound Professionals - SP-CMC-8 , Marcsounds binaurals  Pre amps: Beyerdynamic MV-1 ,  Naiant IPA  Recorders:  Edirol R-44, Edirol R-09HR, Roland  R-05
 
real recorder > phone
 external mics > Internal mics
 FOB > Taper Section
 HATS > better than Denied

Offline timP

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3537
  • Gender: Male
Re:Archos Gmini 120
« Reply #104 on: January 16, 2004, 12:58:42 PM »
here isexcerpt from an IRIVER forum where a guy is doing similar testson the iriver 120, and getting the same spikes...just a little more for the mix...

1.........
In my own recording experiments, there glitches occur with mic-in and line-in.  I did not test optical.  Basically, I recorded a pure 440hz tone (sound editor generated).  Then I uploaded the WAV recording to my PC and examined it.  The glitches seem to happen when the IHP is trying to write the recorded audio to disk (every 30 seconds or so), so I presume that input type does not matter.

In my tests, the glitches show up as small clicks or as slightly distorted waveforms.  BTW, the distortions are not easy to see.

When recording to MP3 format, the disk writes occur less often (once every two or four minutes).

2.......
I did some further tone testing of the IHP-120.

With a silent line-in (very low level signal), the WAV recording was free of clicks and noise.  When the signal level approached 0db (max), the clicks appeared.  They seem to appear at 30 seconds and 90 seconds and 150 seconds and so on (plus or minus ten seconds).  

When I tried recording at 320Kbps MP3, the clicks seemed to appear less often.

When I tried the optical-in with a present but paused signal, there were no clicks, but when I input a song I did detect a click.

So it seems that the clicks/glitches are not hardware noise but are problems with processing the audio signal into a digital format.  No signal means no glitch.

BTW, a signal level that is appropriate for the NJB3 line-in input seems to overload the IHP-120 line-in input.  When testing a tone signal, it is easy to discern an overloading/clipping signal when monitoring the IHP-120.

?>FR2LE

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.146 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF