Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Best quality/price relation for a 4+ channel recorder?  (Read 7031 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15764
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Best quality/price relation for a 4+ channel recorder?
« Reply #15 on: January 25, 2012, 11:39:49 PM »
Thanks for the correction.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline flintstone

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 767
Re: Best quality/price relation for a 4+ channel recorder?
« Reply #16 on: January 28, 2012, 12:57:06 AM »
Here's another indication of how quiet the R-26 XLR preamp is, compared to other multitrack models

http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm
Preamp Equivalent input noise (EIN), unweighted
Tascam DR-680  -125 dBu
Marantz PMD-661  -124 dBu
Roland R-26 XLR  -122 dBu  <------
Tascam DR-100 MkII  -117 dBu
Tascam DR-100 -111 dBu
Tascam DR-2d -106 dBu
Tascam DR-40 -104 dBu

Avisost measured the EIN of the 3.5mm mic input to be -115 dBu, so the XLR input is considerably quieter.
The DR-100 MkII is a lot quieter than the original DR-100.

None of this matters if your mics have a relatively high self noise, or if you're recording in a loud and noisy setting.

Flintstone
« Last Edit: January 28, 2012, 01:08:39 AM by flintstone »

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.042 seconds with 27 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF