I might go to a show and record with both setups, then I can decide also myself a bit better.
Yes, do that! ..regardless of our suggestions and your expectations. Best to do it a few times across different situations. It's the best way to make a truly useful comparison, as free from extraneous variables and cognitive bias as practical. Besides making the most apparent differences clear by comparison of the same material recorded from the same position, this will additionally help make you aware of more subtle acoustic attributes of the different microphones/recording chains, the practical differences in running them, and tangentially - your tolerance for complexity (set things up so as to make it easy to make two recordings at once). If you try different microphones, do it again, and your previous setup becomes your well known baseline of comparison for the new mics.
Whenever you can practically arrange to do so, comparing two recordings made simultaneously of identical material, from the same position, is the #1 way to make a useful, truthful comparison from which you will be able to draw the most information. Same goes for how you choose to arrange the microphone pair, gear other than microphones, and how you set and use that gear. Its not always practical to do this, but its super useful when manageable as it serves to eliminate second guessing and keep us honest with ourselves.
What follows of course is your own critical listening comparison, but also assessment the pro's and cons of each setup in terms of practicality and how one or the other arrangement might best handle different recording situations.