ghellquist is right that the output of the VST 62 is at microphone output levels, not at line levels.
The terminology for condenser microphones is kinda backwards, since the circuitry of a microphone is called its "amplifier," which you connect to a microphone "preamplifier," which amplifies the microphone's signals to line levels. The fact that the "amplifier" comes before the "preamplifier" in this picture is a first-class nuisance for people scratching their heads and trying to comprehend, but there's nothing we can do about it any more; those are the long-established names for these things.
Of course in this case what the VST 62 puts out are "professional condenser microphone" output levels, which may be ~20 dB higher than consumer microphone levels or dynamic/ribbon microphone levels. They can be nearly 1 Volt rms for extremely loud sounds (ca. 130 dB SPL) and for consumer equipment 1 Volt rms would indeed be "line level" but again, for halfway modern professional recording equipment 1 Volt is still in the range of "microphone level," and anyway you're not recording 130 dB SPL close up, or else I'll have to write the whole rest of this message in UPPER CASE because by now you are PROFOUNDLY DEAF.
Under normal circumstances you would probably want to set the low-cut (high-pass) filter to some setting that won't affect the overall sound quality, but that will reduce the low-frequency garbage a little if you want. Depending on the room and the music, that might be 40 Hz (as a rough guess, not knowing your circumstances). It's not a great idea to use low-cut filters to try to fix problems with boominess in a room, since low-frequency sound reproduction depends on so many variables that you almost certainly would be safer making such decisions at home with loudspeakers to let you monitor the effect of your choices. Also, EQ is generally a more versatile tool than a filter for that purpose.
Does that help?