« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2011, 06:02:47 PM »
The MTII can record long sets. It splits the files into 2GB parts, but the whole recording is seamless.
The preamps and ADC in the R09HR and M10 are supposed to be better though.
im about to upgrade my rig from crap gear (MT II) to something decent- budget is an issue, so i have narrowed my recorder choice down to the R 09 HR vs DR 100- both look relatively the same- i want to be able to record a long set @24/96 that is larger then 2 GB- the MT II limited file sizes to 2 GB
opinions please....which should i get
Logged
Mics: B&K 4011, Schoeps MK5 (Nbobs, Naiant PFA), Busman BSC-1 (K11/K21/K31/K41 caps), Church CA-14 (o, c), Church CAFS, Core Sound Binaurals
Pre: EAA PSP-2, Lunatec V3, Nbox-Platinum, Church CA-9200
ADC: Mytek 192 ADC, Oade Mod SBM-1
Rec: Oade Supermod PMD-661, Tascam DR60D, M-Audio MicroTrack II, Korg MR-1 (32GB SSD mod); Sony PCM-M10, Edirol R09HR; iRiver HP-120
Photo: Canon 5D3, Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8, Canon EF 35mm f1.4L Canon EF 24-70 f2.8L MkI, Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS MkI, Canon EF 50 mm f1.4, Canon EF 50 f1.2L, Canon EF 300 f/4L IS, Canon EF 100-400 f4-5.6L IS MkI
Video: Canon HF100
Topic: Edirol R 09 HR vs Tascam DR 100 (Read 2801 times)