Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?  (Read 16855 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DLay

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 257
  • Gender: Male
  • If it has to be loud to be good, it isn't
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #45 on: July 17, 2011, 01:03:03 PM »
The 7xx competition is not a PMD661 but rather recorders from Aaton, Zaxcom, and Nagra.  Compared to recorders from those companies, the Sound Devices boxes are often less expensive.

QFT
Beyerdynamic MC930 > Sound Devices 702t

Offline noam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 185
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #46 on: July 17, 2011, 01:35:57 PM »
You might want to look at the used Marantz pmd 661 in the Yard Sale.  That sounds like the device you are looking for.


I read somewhere here that the Marantz pmd 661 is noisy.

Noam

Offline jbell

  • TDS
  • Trade Count: (149)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4570
  • Gender: Male
  • Spreadicated
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #47 on: July 17, 2011, 02:33:49 PM »
I have only heard good things about the 661 and never heard it is noisy!!   

You might want to look at the used Marantz pmd 661 in the Yard Sale.  That sounds like the device you are looking for.


I read somewhere here that the Marantz pmd 661 is noisy.

Noam
Mics: DPA ST4011ER & 4018ER | Neumann kk 184 (matched)> Nbob/PFA
Preamps: DPA MMA 6000 | Audioroot Femto
Recorders: Sound Devices Mixpre-10 II | Sony PCM A10

-20        -12         -6        TDS   (32/48)     
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][}   
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][} 
__________________________
|Record|  Runtime: 4:19.99  {|||] 75%

Offline macmacmac

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #48 on: October 04, 2011, 05:17:37 AM »
My update wishlist for the 702 recorder:

- USB instead of FireWire with more robust USB 3 socket as on USBpre 2
- Ability to act as a mass storage device or as a USB computer audio interface just as the MixPre-D
- Two CF card slots with the ability of
a) relay recording (record to second card when first becomes full)
b) simultanous recording to both cards for instant backup
- Lower power consumption

Same form factor, same professional look.

Offline hi and lo

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2294
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #49 on: October 04, 2011, 11:34:59 AM »
My update wishlist for the 702 recorder:

- USB instead of FireWire with more robust USB 3 socket as on USBpre 2
- Ability to act as a mass storage device or as a USB computer audio interface just as the MixPre-D
- Two CF card slots with the ability of
a) relay recording (record to second card when first becomes full)
b) simultanous recording to both cards for instant backup
- Lower power consumption

Same form factor, same professional look.

That's a nice list!

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #50 on: October 04, 2011, 01:35:29 PM »
I'd love a USB port of any size, and lower power consumption. Although I have used the firewire ability to have the 722 act as a "master" in the chain, I havn't needed it often enough to warrent keeping it over a USB connection (I am cursed with one of the few mac laptops that doesn't have firewire).
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #51 on: October 04, 2011, 08:00:35 PM »
The second CF card will never happen. The mechanical redesign issues would be too costly and in any case the 702 is already a consumer-cost reduced version for people unable or unwilling to put out the money for the higher capacity internal device versions.  If you need more capacity, buy a 722 and put in a big SSD.  Of course the 7xx devices will write to FLAC if you really need the extra space with what you currently have.  If you want a live back-up, the 722 will record to internal drive and compact flash simultaneously.  The newer versions of 722 firmware also write to firewire devices in parallel. So maybe just upgrading to the more feature rich current machine would meet half your list.

I'm not really sure what you mean by "act as a mass storage device'.  I load my 722 with other files all the time instead of carry a second external storage device when I'm on the road.  I've used it to park files from a camera when I needed to dump the video recorder each night and still used it to record sound the next day.

As for lower power, there is a tradeoff when selecting components and design.  They could likely reduce power consumption but there will be a complementary compromise in the quality of the resulting system. It's not like they are power hogs anyway. I run an external preamp with it's own power supply so I get seven hours between battery changes on the 722. That seems pretty good.
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #52 on: October 04, 2011, 10:41:29 PM »
As for lower power, there is a tradeoff when selecting components and design.  They could likely reduce power consumption but there will be a complementary compromise in the quality of the resulting system. It's not like they are power hogs anyway. I run an external preamp with it's own power supply so I get seven hours between battery changes on the 722. That seems pretty good.

true, but the 722 sitting idle draws more in both volts and amps than the usbpre2 does (which is essentially a recorder-less 702) by a significant amount. 5v and 1 amp if you've got every possible power sucker turned on and using earthworks mics. True, it may not be as robust in it's failover capabilities, but it accomplishes the same goal minus the storage element.

I still think the 7 series are excellent machines. Not much I'd change about them, but there are a couple.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline ero3030

  • Trade Count: (59)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1630
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sound Devices 7xx series- why are they so expensive?
« Reply #53 on: October 06, 2011, 05:34:36 PM »
why did we pay so much for r portadats?  not much more to say.  ed
needin some fishhead music!

" known for f**king up a good weekend on a Thursday nite "

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 34 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF