Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: 480b/ck62 or mkh20?  (Read 2392 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dlh

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Gender: Male
480b/ck62 or mkh20?
« on: May 12, 2011, 08:20:32 AM »
Neverending slutty quest -
Looking for opinions on this choice for split omni's.
Mostly for classical/chamber/choral and acoustic jazz.
Any comps?

Thanks,
Dave
480b, 460b, Line Audio CM3, SP LSD2, AT BP4025, SP C4,
MiniMe, MiniMP, AND ANNOUNCING the recent adoption of a Mini-Dac. The little bro's are SO excited  :yahoo:

DR-680, DR-100 MKII, PMD671, fr2LE, MTII

De gustibus non est disputandum.
"It's just this little chromium switch here.  You people are soo superstitious."

jnorman34

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: 480b/ck62 or mkh20?
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2011, 07:08:57 PM »
sort of a tossup IMO.  i have had several pairs of the 480s with various capsules, and they have always performed flawlessly with totally professional results.  several tracks on various CDs i have produced for RoseWynde (flute/harp duo) were made using the 481s.  they are certainly in the same league as my DPA 4011s and schoeps cmc64s.  the omni caps are beautifully flat and smooth.  their best attribute is high end results at a reasonable cost, if you can find them used.

OTOH, the 8020s are all the rage right now with many pro classical engineers, while the older mkh 20s are not chosen so often - the 8020s offer inconspicuous size for forward mounting, super flat and smooth, great resale value.  the 20s and 8020s do have more color than the AKGs, sort of a signature senn sound, which you either like or dont like according to taste.  i sold my 20s when i first bought a pair of DPA 4006s.

right now, if i had to choose between those 2, i would say the mkh 20s, but overall, i generally prefer the neumann and DPA sound over both akg and sennheiser.  right now, my main studio omnis are DPA 4090s, which i just love, and which also sometimes beat out my km140s as a main pair for chamber work.

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: 480b/ck62 or mkh20?
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2011, 10:41:21 PM »
Or you could go them MBHO route ;)
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline mepaca

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 269
  • taperssection member
Re: 480b/ck62 or mkh20?
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2011, 12:32:10 AM »
I have pairs of both and love both dearly. Both have low self noise and are quieter than both dpa and earthworks. The mkh 20 has high end lift and the pressure buildup ring and are probably used more for classical. The akgs have a high pass filter and are probably more versatile with the selection of caps. Neither will disappoint. The microtech gefell 296 with the nickel cap is a serious contender.

Offline John Willett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Gender: Male
  • Bio:
    • Sound-Link ProAudio
Re: 480b/ck62 or mkh20?
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2011, 10:56:08 AM »
Neverending slutty quest -
Looking for opinions on this choice for split omni's.
Mostly for classical/chamber/choral and acoustic jazz.
Any comps?

Thanks,
Dave

I would add the MKH 8020 to your list - I have both the MKH 20 and 8020

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF