Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Healy technique?  (Read 7150 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline silentmark

  • Shine with or without cherries ?
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2685
  • Gender: Male
  • Boat, cucumber, wire ...
Re:Healy technique?
« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2003, 09:59:55 AM »
I personally don't care for the cross channel bleed that occurs when you get omni's too close together.

How close is too close ?
Dissent is the highest form of patriotism. - Howard Zinn, not Thomas Jefferson ...

Mics: Neumann AK50/AK40/AK30/AK20(1 for M/S), AKG568eb's (gathering dust)
Decks: R-44 (OCM), Fostex FR2LE (OWM), Microtacker (semi-retired), D8 (retired), D7 (retired)
Pre-amps: Apogee Minime (semi-retired), Sonosax SX-M2 (semi-retired), Oade mod SBM-1 (retired)
Cables: LC3 actives (older lemo style x2), Audio Magic Hyper Conductor interconnects

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3qrWOOposQ

Offline sexymexi

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1777
  • Gender: Male
    • show list
Re:Healy technique?
« Reply #16 on: October 24, 2003, 05:09:56 PM »
yep!
You have to consdier that your ears are baffled by your head. There is no baffle in the Healy technique.

Moke, how much different is that than hrtf?
BTW, this technique makes listening to the recording on headphones eargasmic!

eargasmic, i love it..  +T's
AKG 391's > phantom boxes > JB3 or Casio DA-7
Panasonic WM1610 omni's > whatever

Playback: Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS Platinum > Onkyo TSDX595 > matched Oynix Rockets > Mirage FRX-S8 sub

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 31 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF