Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Weird Orchestra Miking  (Read 9346 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15748
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Weird Orchestra Miking
« Reply #30 on: October 29, 2012, 12:44:45 PM »
Ok well here is the same movement from the night before: www.jellyinajar.com/2012-03-03NewCenturyChamberOrchestra1stSet_sample.wav

Same gear, also St34lth, first row, not quite but very close to center.  On the second night was about 15-20 feet from nearest instruments, first night maybe 30 feet.  Both nights vertical height was approximately the same with relation to performers, only distance from stage differed.  But first night much livelier acoustics in the hall.  First night sound is not to my liking but I realize people have different tastes about reverb.   I suspect that people are more used to classical music recordings that have what I consider a lot of ambiance.

This orchestra has no conductor but is led by the first violinist; the group has 20 or so players depending on the piece.

First night venue was First Congregational Church of Berkeley: see a picture here: http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=9Z9&sa=X&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1680&bih=880&tbm=isch&prmd=imvns&tbnid=zHt9mJaILFsKMM:&imgrefurl=http://ratcliffarch.com/projects/first_congregational&docid=d3869vvGe97MkM&imgurl=http://ratcliffarch.com/content/projects/first_congregational/First_Congregational_1.jpg&w=900&h=500&ei=TFqIULTVJ4Hs8gTzqoDIAg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=336&vpy=305&dur=553&hovh=167&hovw=301&tx=138&ty=84&sig=104526446527607864303&page=1&tbnh=132&tbnw=245&start=0&ndsp=44&ved=1t:429,r:9,s:0,i:99 or do a Google image search.  I was in first row first seat from aisle.

Second night was Osher Marin JCC: see a picture here: http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=kk9&sa=X&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1680&bih=880&tbm=isch&prmd=imvns&tbnid=eVtRblygO4FOFM:&imgrefurl=http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/4/prweb9376987.htm&docid=lOE3HtNaHj1vmM&imgurl=http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2012/04/05/9376987/hoytt%252520nye.jpg&w=610&h=409&ei=3VyIUJigJ5G09gS02YGQAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=191&vpy=186&dur=875&hovh=184&hovw=274&tx=119&ty=136&sig=104526446527607864303&page=2&tbnh=132&tbnw=215&start=40&ndsp=51&ved=1t:429,r:37,s:20,i:249 or do a google image search to get an idea what that hall is like

I finally got a chance to listen to both, which strike me as excellent examples of the primary importance of distance over many other mic placement considerations when choice of location is limited.  As you mention, the ideal balance of direct and reverberant sound room is subjective, and although the detail is welcome, I find the second night a bit too dry and close for my taste.  The first night is somewhat over distant and reverberant, yet personally I find it far more satisfying for extended listening.  Ideally I'd choose a perspective somewhere between the two, combining detail with appropriate lush room reveberance, which I think might be available by using omnis instead of cardioids from the same location as night two, or placing the cardioids closer for night one (which I realize was not an option).  Different rooms though, so it’s difficult to speculate.  Thanks for posting the samples- nice performance and good job given the constraints.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 30 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF