Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?  (Read 7796 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jpschust

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4226
  • Padres Rule Your Face
Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« on: February 02, 2006, 10:36:16 AM »
Trying to look at the differences in the large screen plasmas between the panasonic and the pioneer.  Are there any feelings strongly one way or the other?
Quote from: Todd Snider
They say 3 percent of the people use 5 to 6 percent of their brain
97 percent use 3 percent and the rest goes down the drain
I'll never know which one I am but I'll bet you my last dime
99 percent think with 3 percent 100 percent of the time

Offline scb

  • Eli Manning should die of gonorrhea and rot in hell. Would you like a cookie, son?
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8677
  • Gender: Male
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2006, 10:49:48 AM »
my "strong" feelings are still that plasma is too expensive :)

Offline jpschust

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4226
  • Padres Rule Your Face
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2006, 10:51:11 AM »
my "strong" feelings are still that plasma is too expensive :)

then do you suggest going lcd for flat panel?

im not getting an rp set.  this has to go on a wall.
Quote from: Todd Snider
They say 3 percent of the people use 5 to 6 percent of their brain
97 percent use 3 percent and the rest goes down the drain
I'll never know which one I am but I'll bet you my last dime
99 percent think with 3 percent 100 percent of the time

Offline scb

  • Eli Manning should die of gonorrhea and rot in hell. Would you like a cookie, son?
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8677
  • Gender: Male
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2006, 11:07:55 AM »
also too expensive for me :)

can't help with the plasmas.  sorry i'm no help here...i'll shut up now

Offline jpschust

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4226
  • Padres Rule Your Face
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2006, 11:12:39 AM »
thanks for that :)

next!
Quote from: Todd Snider
They say 3 percent of the people use 5 to 6 percent of their brain
97 percent use 3 percent and the rest goes down the drain
I'll never know which one I am but I'll bet you my last dime
99 percent think with 3 percent 100 percent of the time

Offline MattD

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
  • Gender: Male
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2006, 11:21:49 AM »
When my parents got their Pioneer, they did a side-by-side with other similarly priced screens. I don't know if Panasonic was one of them. Of course, this is also in a store with (likely) uncalibrated sets. Still, they liked the picture quality of the Pioneer better than the competition.
Out of the game … for now?

Offline scervin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
  • Gender: Male
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2006, 11:58:07 AM »
Pioneer!  Hands down the best, but Panasonic is a close second.  I'll say I'm pretty picky when it comes to video and my next living room set will be a 42 or 50" Pioneer.

BTW, you said it must go on the wall.....get a projector!  ;D

Offline jpschust

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4226
  • Padres Rule Your Face
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2006, 11:59:48 AM »
Pioneer!  Hands down the best, but Panasonic is a close second.  I'll say I'm pretty picky when it comes to video and my next living room set will be a 42 or 50" Pioneer.

BTW, you said it must go on the wall.....get a projector!  ;D

I don't want to have to deal with the aiming- very very high ceilings.
Quote from: Todd Snider
They say 3 percent of the people use 5 to 6 percent of their brain
97 percent use 3 percent and the rest goes down the drain
I'll never know which one I am but I'll bet you my last dime
99 percent think with 3 percent 100 percent of the time

Offline scervin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
  • Gender: Male
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2006, 12:24:47 PM »
They are so easy to mount.  Time consuming yes, but pretty easy.  Measure twice, cut once   ;D

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2006, 12:28:42 PM »
would both plasmas and lcds be the same depth..? i have to mount one on a wall, too (over the mantle of a fireplace, to be exact)...
-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline jpschust

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4226
  • Padres Rule Your Face
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2006, 12:36:05 PM »
i wont be doing the mounting myself- my guys will be doing all of that for me.  they've got quite a bit of electrical work to do as well, so this is nothing for them.   the plasmas and lcds ive seen in my size range are very close in terms of depth.
Quote from: Todd Snider
They say 3 percent of the people use 5 to 6 percent of their brain
97 percent use 3 percent and the rest goes down the drain
I'll never know which one I am but I'll bet you my last dime
99 percent think with 3 percent 100 percent of the time

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2006, 12:39:05 PM »
gotcha.

i remember an article in wired from a few months back (the one with the three actors from king kong on the cover), and it had three plasmas reviewed - and the top of the line pioneer and panasonic were 2 of the 3. the most expensive one won, coming in around five large; i believe the second place finisher was over $3k. one was the panasonic and ine was the pioneer, but i dont remember which was which...

-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline scervin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
  • Gender: Male
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2006, 12:46:32 PM »
Pioneer 50" = $5K

If it has to go above the mantle ok, but if not get the center of screen just above your eyes while seated.  1/3 of screen should be below and is best, but the tv then looks like it is on the floor.

sc

Offline jpschust

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4226
  • Padres Rule Your Face
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2006, 12:52:07 PM »
scott, maybe you know this- what's the difference (besides 500 bucks) between the pioneer elite 50" and the other 50"?
Quote from: Todd Snider
They say 3 percent of the people use 5 to 6 percent of their brain
97 percent use 3 percent and the rest goes down the drain
I'll never know which one I am but I'll bet you my last dime
99 percent think with 3 percent 100 percent of the time

Offline jpschust

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4226
  • Padres Rule Your Face
Re: Panasonic or Pioneer for Plasma?
« Reply #14 on: February 02, 2006, 01:41:16 PM »
I've not seen anything on the fujitsu brand in terms of plasma.
Quote from: Todd Snider
They say 3 percent of the people use 5 to 6 percent of their brain
97 percent use 3 percent and the rest goes down the drain
I'll never know which one I am but I'll bet you my last dime
99 percent think with 3 percent 100 percent of the time

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.097 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF