Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09  (Read 2645 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AndyLGR

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
  • Gender: Male
Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09
« on: January 21, 2014, 07:39:26 AM »
I've been using an Edirol R09 for the last 6 years or so for stealth taping, but I was looking for something that was smaller in size,whilst still giving similar or better results and was relatively cheap.

Does anyone have any good suggestions for alternatives?

I use SP-CMC-4U cards and a sound professionals battery box with it through the line in if that makes any difference.

Thanks.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2014, 09:31:55 AM by AndyLGR »

Offline yates7592

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 694
  • Gender: Male
Re: Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2014, 08:05:20 AM »
Roland R-05, that deck is tiny, smaller than the M10 and cheaper as well.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2014, 08:08:44 AM by yates7592 »

Offline mec111272

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 624
  • Gender: Male
  • Me? Who me? I'm not doing anything!
    • My LMA List
Re: Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2014, 09:22:28 AM »
I have had good luck going line in from a UA-5 or CA-9100 to a yamaha c24 this thing is very small. 24-bit to boot. One AAA battery last the whole night.

http://usa.yamaha.com/products/music-production/recorders/pocketrak_c24/?mode=model

https://archive.org/details/furthur2012-07-05.e70.flac 
Neumann KM-140,Church Audio Ca-14, Card Omni, CAD e70

Edirol UA-5 (T+ mod), Church Audio CA-9200, M148

Tascam DR2D, Marantz PMD 660 (Oade Songcatcher)

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15720
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2014, 10:56:44 AM »
Difficult to get a whole lot smaller.  Not sure, and not as common around here, but I think the Olympus recorders are narrower and thinner, may be the same length or a bit longer.  Check them out.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline TSNéa

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2014, 09:50:51 PM »
+1.
From this:
http://www.theatreofnoise.com/2010/04/sony-pcm-m10-versus-olympus-ls-10-ls-11.html
I decided to get an Olympus LS-5, which is more recent.

For some specs (dimensions, weight and EIN), see also:
http://www.theatreofnoise.com/2009/11/summary-of-portable-digital-audio.html

Hope this helps.

Offline earmonger

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 598
  • 20-20000 Hz
Re: Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2014, 10:09:45 PM »
I don't really want to rain on anyone's parade but I looked at the LS-5 specs.

http://www.olympus.co.uk/site/en/a/audio_systems/audio_recording/sound_music_recorders/ls_5/ls_5_specifications.html

I noted two things. Recording in mp3, even at 320 kbps, only goes down to 50hz. That's a deal-breaker for me, even if .wav recording does go down to 20Hz.  That may be of more concern for a music recorder than for a natural ambience or interview  recorder, but it is a limitation.

It also looks like you can only put in 16 "index" marks--track marks on the Sony--which also may not be enough. And one review said those track marks are audible. http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/nov10/articles/olympusls5.html For me that's absolutely a deal-breaker. 

Then again, the crucial thing is how you're going to use it. If you don't need those capabilities it might be the perfect gizmo.

Offline axomxa

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 596
  • Gender: Male
  • If it ain't live, it ain't Dead
Re: Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2014, 10:25:15 PM »
The only "stealth" taping I even consider these days (rarely) is with "modified" full rig such as this one:

http://bt.etree.org/details.php?id=568049

Easy with an extra 20 bucks spent for VIP (foundation room) entrance.  No search at all  ;)
Mics: MBHO 603 (KA200N, matched pair) / AKG C460B (ck63, a60/ck1, NBob/PFA actives) / Senn MS14P (MKE 4012 supercards & 4010 cards) / AKG SE300B (ck91 & ck92)
Mic Cables: 15' 3 channel GAKable / 15' custom Star Quad / 12' Mogami
Pres/ADC:  Grace V3 / Denecke PS2 > Denecke AD20
Recorders: Tascam DR-680 (Busman mod) / Tascam D70 / Sony PCM-D50

Photography rig:
Canon 60D, EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

LMA tapes:   https://archive.org/search.php?query=crupi%20AND%20collection%3Aetree&sort=-publicdate
Etree tapes:  http://bt.etree.org/?searchsss=axomxa&cat=0

Offline yates7592

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 694
  • Gender: Male
Re: Looking for a smaller recorder than my current Edirol R09
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2014, 03:19:43 AM »
I would point you back to the R-05 - it is on a par with the Sony M10, better than the R09, and smaller than both the M10 and R09. You aren't going to get that quality any smaller IMO.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.073 seconds with 36 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF