Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?  (Read 3077 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline johnnybottom

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« on: September 18, 2009, 06:08:29 PM »
Trying to figure just owning at822, if I should get the SP PREAMP for it,
or go with the Church audio c14 9100 .
Price point being close enough to each other.

Recording live loud music,

Thank you!
Jc
www.ReflectionsBand.net


Offline rastasean

  • in paradise
  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3699
  • Gender: Male
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2009, 07:06:01 PM »
what recorder are you using?
Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it’s worth.

Offline johnnybottom

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2009, 08:39:11 PM »
Previously just going into Sony DR-7 MD mic in,
NOW...using Fostex MR8 HD which is a 4 channel with
line level inputs I guess...

..so my At822 w/o a preamp has been really lame
I post mix 2 channels from Sbd , with 2 from mic,
for a 'so-called' matrix.

Any thoughts appreciated
Thanks,
JC

Offline johnnybottom

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2009, 12:36:17 AM »
Interesting.... i was really expecting a few pro CA14 comments.

Offline illconditioned

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2997
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2009, 02:27:58 AM »
I don't know about the CA14 sound, but the AT822 is a very nice mic, particularly for a matrix, where you can strengthen and/or crisp up the vocal with the soundboard feed.

The main thing is get the mic close to the stage.  If you can clamp it somewhere, run wires, and put your recorder at the board, that is an ideal setup.  I've used this many times.

If you're going to put the mics farther back, I would hold out for some good condensers, either Beyerdynamic MC930 or AKG 463 is what I use, but lots of other possibilities as well.  I've noticed that lesser mics don't sound as good when you get farther back in the room.

  Richard
« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 02:29:42 AM by illconditioned »
Please DO NOT mail me with tech questions.  I will try to answer in the forums when I get a chance.  Thanks.

Sample recordings at: http://www.soundmann.com.

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2009, 06:43:05 AM »
NOW...using Fostex MR8 HD which is a 4 channel with
line level inputs I guess...

..so my At822 w/o a preamp has been really lame
I post mix 2 channels from Sbd , with 2 from mic,

Johnny, your gear chain doesn't really make sense to me.
AT822 is a battery-only mic, which means it's less-than-ideal for recording loud music.

Church gear is great for stealth, but since you'll be dragging the Fostex around I assume you run open - so why go for stealth gear?

And your Fostex can provice P48, so why not go for mics that can benefit from that?!

Get yourself a pair of phantom powered mics that you can mount on a stand. There are plenty of options, take a look at the ADK blowout sale in the Ebay section right now.
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline batchain

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 238
  • Gender: Male
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2009, 01:20:49 PM »
Sunjan is right, the AT822 is self powered. I think the AT825 is the phantom powered version of the same mic.
Primary: Peluso CEMC6/CK-4/CK-21 > Fostex FR2-LE or Tascam DR-680
Secondary: Edirol R09-HR

Offline johnnybottom

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2009, 10:05:36 PM »
Thanks for clarifying things.
Use phantom power with new mics, seems to be it.
Trying to keep to a budget...
Might those CAD e70 dual cap mics ($99) be reasonable here?

Thank You

Jc


Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2009, 05:33:02 AM »
Thanks for clarifying things.
Use phantom power with new mics, seems to be it.
Trying to keep to a budget...
Might those CAD e70 dual cap mics ($99) be reasonable here?

Hmm, that's $200 for a pair.
http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,122357.0.html

But consider if the ADK a51s aren't still a better deal right now:
http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,126423.msg1679574.html#msg1679574
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline johnnybottom

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 SP-PREAMP --> C-14 9100 ?
« Reply #9 on: September 24, 2009, 07:11:32 AM »
Cool. I didnt realize they are still available.
the ebay link is finished I beleive.
Ill try to give him a call.
Thanks,

Jc

Offline johnnybottom

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 --> C-14 9100 --> ADK a51s. yes.
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2009, 03:40:19 PM »
Wow Im psyched! Ive got a pair of a51 s on the way
Thanks for the prudent advice!

1 more.... would these require a preamp going into my fostex ?
thanks,

Jc

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: Is this an Upgrade at822 --> C-14 9100 --> ADK a51s. yes.
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2009, 08:11:02 AM »
1 more.... would these require a preamp going into my fostex ?

Does the Fostex have built-in mic preamps? I guess you'd be the best one to answer this, if you got the manual.
The official website isn't really crystal clear, but it would be weird to design a device supporting mics with P48 and not providing any preamp for at least some of the channels.
These specs seems to indicate it does, at least:
http://www.fostexusa.com/index.php?file=products/digital/mr8hd

INPUTS/OUTPUTS
Analog In (4ch)
Connector

Input Level
Input Impedance   
- XLR-3-31 type (Pin2:hot) and ø 6mm TRS phone
- 48dBV (MIC) - +4dBV (LINE)
- 1.5k ohm or more (MIC/BAL)
- 40k ohm or more (LINE/UNBAL)
- 500k ohm or more (GUITAR/UNBAL)
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.069 seconds with 38 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF