Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722  (Read 39919 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Govt Mule

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 946
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #30 on: October 08, 2004, 07:04:05 PM »
Quote
recent ratdog shows ripped the dead to pieces. if you miss the grateful dead see ratdog for a buzz you won't get from the dead.

No Garcia
No Buzz
Logged
Water tastes funny when you're far from your home, But it's only the thirsty that hunger to roam.- John Prine

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #31 on: October 10, 2004, 06:01:03 PM »
I agree, I think all these Dead cover bands are crap, haven't heard a good one yet!
Logged
Quote from: Cooker on November 24, 2005, 11:44:50 AM
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline Sean Gallemore

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8316
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #32 on: October 11, 2004, 01:34:36 AM »
Quote from: studio_geek on October 08, 2004, 06:03:38 PM
recent ratdog shows ripped the dead to pieces. if you miss the grateful dead see ratdog for a buzz you won't get from the dead.

*as jerry rolls in his grave*
Logged

BobW

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #33 on: October 11, 2004, 03:05:01 AM »
Quote from: studio_geek on October 08, 2004, 06:03:38 PM
recent ratdog shows ripped the dead to pieces. if you miss the grateful dead see ratdog for a buzz you won't get from the dead.

Which Dead ?
The 2004 Dead or the 1993 Dead ?

But still, the music evolves, it must. Some years and line-ups are bound to be better than others.
There were years when the GD simply weren't as hot as others, so why should it be different now ?
Goes with the territory, I think.
Logged

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #34 on: October 11, 2004, 07:47:04 AM »
i'm tellin' ya carl, ratdog does not suck.
neither does P&F...but especialy not the doggy.  You just dont like jazz...and they have a jazzy sound, so I can understand your distaste for them.
Logged

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #35 on: October 11, 2004, 05:01:26 PM »
i've already gotten into this conversation once this past week, im stayin out for now :)
Logged

Offline bhtoque

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
  • Gender: Male
  • So much music, so little time.
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #36 on: October 11, 2004, 05:08:19 PM »
Hey Carl, got to see your Fr-2 last night at stone church.

Looks pretty, but doesn't work too well. You need to pack that thing in a feather pillow or something so the vibrations don't cause the drive to lock up.

Funny how I see your gear at more shows than I see you at. :P

JAson
Logged
MG 200/210/270
AKG c422>s42>Hydra silver interconnects
AKG 391/92/93>MK 90/3 actives
>AM Hyper-Conductors
Studio Projects LSD2>MiAGi II
>Edirol R-4 (Oade T Mod)

db.etree.org/bhtoque

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #37 on: October 11, 2004, 07:31:21 PM »
Jason that is funny! I'm telling you, I am this close to quitting this job & getting a different one. I can't stay out late on a schoolnight anymore b/c I actually have to work now! Screw this, I need a new job ;D
So it was locking up again?? I wonder if it was the same drive or not? I have two & I don't know which one John is using? We may have a problem here?
Logged
Quote from: Cooker on November 24, 2005, 11:44:50 AM
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #38 on: October 11, 2004, 07:32:48 PM »
and Nick is right, I guess I don't really get into the spacey jazzy thing except for when the dead did it in the 70's, mostly everything else is just crap, like Ratdogsh*t ;D
Logged
Quote from: Cooker on November 24, 2005, 11:44:50 AM
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline Daryan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1078
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #39 on: October 11, 2004, 08:40:34 PM »
Karl,

This is a known issue with these units.  It happens to me too when you are very very close to the sound source like way fob in a bar.  E-mail me at daryan.v.lenz.nv8n@statefarm.com and I will tell you about the solution I came up with that has worked thus far.  Fostex claims it is not abnormal!

Daryan
Logged
Microtech Gefell 200/210->Zaolla Silverlines->Fostex FR-2 (oade modified plus other self mods)

Playback: Bolder modified Squeezebox SB3 (building linear power supply)->Bolder Cable Modified Panasonic XR-45 with bybee's->Bolder Nitro speaker cables->VMPS Audio super modified 626r's, VMPS Larger SUB, 1000w class AB sub amp
Tweaks: isolation and room treatments, silclear, BPT 1.5r Power Conditioner (modified), isoblocks, vibrapods, many others

Offline wboswell

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Gender: Male
  • Don't call what you're wearing an outfit
    • Trey Woodruff on guitar
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #40 on: October 11, 2004, 10:19:56 PM »
Doesn't the PDAudio run on the same drives?  Does it have the same problems handling the vibration?
Logged

Offline Sean Gallemore

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8316
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #41 on: October 12, 2004, 04:39:00 AM »
Quote from: ShittyTapes on October 11, 2004, 08:40:34 PM
Karl,

This is a known issue with these units.  It happens to me too when you are very very close to the sound source like way fob in a bar.  E-mail me at daryan.v.lenz.nv8n@statefarm.com and I will tell you about the solution I came up with that has worked thus far.  Fostex claims it is not abnormal!

Daryan

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
Logged

Offline Daryan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1078
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #42 on: October 12, 2004, 02:53:40 PM »
I don't believe it does have the same issues at all.  I am having a hard time understanding why the issue would be with the fr-2 and not with the pd audio cards.  As I said, I have a temporary solution, though I think another e-mail to fostex is in order.

Daryan
Logged
Microtech Gefell 200/210->Zaolla Silverlines->Fostex FR-2 (oade modified plus other self mods)

Playback: Bolder modified Squeezebox SB3 (building linear power supply)->Bolder Cable Modified Panasonic XR-45 with bybee's->Bolder Nitro speaker cables->VMPS Audio super modified 626r's, VMPS Larger SUB, 1000w class AB sub amp
Tweaks: isolation and room treatments, silclear, BPT 1.5r Power Conditioner (modified), isoblocks, vibrapods, many others

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #43 on: October 12, 2004, 03:10:22 PM »
just post the solution here.
Logged

Offline Mic D

  • Habitual Line Stepper
  • Trade Count: (19)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1999
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr-2 Vs. SD 722
« Reply #44 on: October 12, 2004, 03:21:25 PM »
yeah, why keep it a secret?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.106 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF