Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: mk41 vs. CA14 Comps  (Read 6611 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kenyee

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: mk41 vs. CA14 Comps
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2013, 09:23:00 AM »
Not exactly the same, but a schoeps comp non the less.  CA-9200 this time.

Volumes of two recordings are also different.  Generally, if you make something sound louder, people like it more because they hear more (unless the output it crap of course).
I hear almost the same thing as before but less of a difference.  The CA-14 sounds less tinny and a bit more 3D than the previous comparison.  The Mk4 sounds like it has more bass and is more 3D than the CA-14.  The CA-14 also sounds more forward (closer to the instruments).

There's no way to swap in the CA-14 w/ the same preamp as the Schoeps via XLR adapters?

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: mk41 vs. CA14 Comps
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2013, 09:26:09 AM »
THIS IS AN INVALID COMP  ;D
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline bryonsos

  • Omni addict
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2061
  • Gender: Male
  • If it's important, tell me to write it down.
    • LMA uploads
Re: mk41 vs. CA14 Comps
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2013, 09:52:21 AM »
THIS IS AN INVALID COMP  ;D

Hey! I thought I was the purveyor of invalid comps :P
Mics: 3 Zigma Chi HA-FX (COL-251, c, h, o-d, o-f) / Avenson STO-2 / Countryman B3s
Pres: CA-Ugly / Naiant Tinyhead / SD MixPre
Decks: Roland R-44 / Sony PCM-M10
GAKables
Dead Muppets

My recordings LMA / BT / TTD

Offline mec111272

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 624
  • Gender: Male
  • Me? Who me? I'm not doing anything!
    • My LMA List
Re: mk41 vs. CA14 Comps
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2013, 10:34:16 AM »
Agreed Invalid,  but to the point, We were not sharing a stand, I was a 10 feet to the left.


Ca-14 > CA-9200 > Panasonic C24 = $300

choeps MK4>KC5>CMC6>Sonosax SX-M2>Apogee Mini-me(aes out,24bit/96khz)>COAX>Edirol R-44 & Soundboard>R-44 = ? $10,000

In true slutty fashion I have moved on from the CA-14's to KM140's   so there you go. 
« Last Edit: March 08, 2013, 10:35:57 AM by mec111272 »
Neumann KM-140,Church Audio Ca-14, Card Omni, CAD e70

Edirol UA-5 (T+ mod), Church Audio CA-9200, M148

Tascam DR2D, Marantz PMD 660 (Oade Songcatcher)

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: mk41 vs. CA14 Comps
« Reply #19 on: March 09, 2013, 02:40:10 AM »
Used thats only about $5,500.00 give or take :P ;D 8)
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 30 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF