Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: EM-123 ????  (Read 3934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MJ

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 207
  • Gender: Male
EM-123 ????
« on: April 22, 2007, 09:07:37 AM »
Hi all
Does anybody know this condenser microphone ????

EM-123
Sensitivity -63±3dB (0dB = 1V/Pa, 1kHz)
Impedance Less than 1.6k Ω
Directivity Omnidirectional
Frequency 20-16,000 Hz
Max. operation voltage 10V
Standard operation voltage 3V
Current consumption Max. 0.4mA

My friends bought only 2 pieces from a small Japanese electronic company not knowing much about the importance of matching two mics :'(.  Two days ago I went to a heavy rock show to test his microphone. 

EM-123 (in my ears) >Battery Box>TCD-D-8 (recording level 7.5)
Band; Europe
Venue; Osaka Kouseinenkin Kaikan, Osaka Japan
Date;April 20th 2007

Using the way too unmatched mics and setting a 7.5 recording level overloaded D-8 :'(.  But if I had set the recording level correct and used the low-cut filter, maybe I would have had more than a decent recording.

Is there anybody who actually used this microphone before?
Any info would be appreciated.

Just in case you wonder how this sounds, I uploaded Flac files of three recordings of the same song by three different microphones (two of them from the same show)

AT943s>ST9100>Iriver120 (Jan 29th 2007 Austria)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/hffpdb

EM123>Battery Box>TCD-D8 (April 20th 2007 Japan)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/2digmm

AT943s>Denecke-PS2 mini>TCD-D100 (April 20th 2007 Japan)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/e2y9cl

<Main Rigs>
Schoeps MK4s>(Nbox Active cables)>Nbox+ or Nbox Platinum>Izzy (Split) Cables>Sony PCM-M10 or Sony PCM-D100

<Sub Rigs>
(1)DPA4061s>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)>Church Audio Pre>(3.5 stereo mini+Canare cable + 3.5 stereo mini)>Sony PCM-M10
(2)DSM-6S/L>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)> Sony PCM-M10

<IEM>
(1)scanner
 DJ-X2000
 IC-RX7
(2)receiver
Shure P10R
Sennheiser ek2000
(3)recorders
Marntz PMD706

Roving Sign

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2007, 09:17:47 AM »
Looks like a Primo part number...

http://www.primomic.com/products/em-123.htm

Offline MJ

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 207
  • Gender: Male
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2007, 09:50:55 AM »
Looks like a Primo part number...

http://www.primomic.com/products/em-123.htm

Thanks for the info.  My friends told me that he got it from Iko Electronics ???.
But it looks like this is it.

Koichi
<Main Rigs>
Schoeps MK4s>(Nbox Active cables)>Nbox+ or Nbox Platinum>Izzy (Split) Cables>Sony PCM-M10 or Sony PCM-D100

<Sub Rigs>
(1)DPA4061s>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)>Church Audio Pre>(3.5 stereo mini+Canare cable + 3.5 stereo mini)>Sony PCM-M10
(2)DSM-6S/L>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)> Sony PCM-M10

<IEM>
(1)scanner
 DJ-X2000
 IC-RX7
(2)receiver
Shure P10R
Sennheiser ek2000
(3)recorders
Marntz PMD706

Roving Sign

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2007, 09:59:38 AM »
Iko - probably just the retailer...

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2007, 11:13:13 AM »
Hi all
Does anybody know this condenser microphone ????

EM-123
Sensitivity -63±3dB (0dB = 1V/Pa, 1kHz)
Impedance Less than 1.6k Ω
Directivity Omnidirectional
Frequency 20-16,000 Hz
Max. operation voltage 10V
Standard operation voltage 3V
Current consumption Max. 0.4mA

My friends bought only 2 pieces from a small Japanese electronic company not knowing much about the importance of matching two mics :'(.  Two days ago I went to a heavy rock show to test his microphone. 

EM-123 (in my ears) >Battery Box>TCD-D-8 (recording level 7.5)
Band; Europe
Venue; Osaka Kouseinenkin Kaikan, Osaka Japan
Date;April 20th 2007

Using the way too unmatched mics and setting a 7.5 recording level overloaded D-8 :'(.  But if I had set the recording level correct and used the low-cut filter, maybe I would have had more than a decent recording.

Is there anybody who actually used this microphone before?
Any info would be appreciated.

Just in case you wonder how this sounds, I uploaded Flac files of three recordings of the same song by three different microphones (two of them from the same show)

AT943s>ST9100>Iriver120 (Jan 29th 2007 Austria)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/hffpdb

EM123>Battery Box>TCD-D8 (April 20th 2007 Japan)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/2digmm

AT943s>Denecke-PS2 mini>TCD-D100 (April 20th 2007 Japan)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/e2y9cl



This is the microphone I have used in my binaural microphones since the beginning of my company.. They are an outstanding microphone a frequency response of 20hz to 40khz.. +- 5 db or so not to bad... I do my 4.7 k mod to them to increase the SPL handing of the mic.. its a very good capsule.. If you want any tips on how to do that mod let me know. Matching them is very important part of getting a good balanced recording. Its funny more people have not tried these... :)

Chris
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline MJ

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 207
  • Gender: Male
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2007, 05:13:42 AM »

This is the microphone I have used in my binaural microphones since the beginning of my company.. They are an outstanding microphone a frequency response of 20hz to 40khz.. +- 5 db or so not to bad... I do my 4.7 k mod to them to increase the SPL handing of the mic.. its a very good capsule.. If you want any tips on how to do that mod let me know. Matching them is very important part of getting a good balanced recording. Its funny more people have not tried these... :)

Chris


Hi Chris
I am not a tech guy and will never be very soon.  But I would love to hear anything that could make a better recording with this microphone.  You always seem to be way far ahead of me.  If it is not too much to ask, please share that big secret with me. 
The price I paid for EM-123 is only a fraction of that I paid for other microphones.  Yet this omni-directional microphone can handle with higher sound pressure (the sensitivity;-63db) and capture a lot more bass and decent highs. 

So I have three sets of microphone now;
EM-123 (omni) 
AT943 (card & hyper card)
AT843 (card)
I read about matrix recordings and am interested in doing it myself.  Tonight I will mix two sources (EM-123+AT943 card) to see how the omni & card-configure works out.
Koichi
<Main Rigs>
Schoeps MK4s>(Nbox Active cables)>Nbox+ or Nbox Platinum>Izzy (Split) Cables>Sony PCM-M10 or Sony PCM-D100

<Sub Rigs>
(1)DPA4061s>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)>Church Audio Pre>(3.5 stereo mini+Canare cable + 3.5 stereo mini)>Sony PCM-M10
(2)DSM-6S/L>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)> Sony PCM-M10

<IEM>
(1)scanner
 DJ-X2000
 IC-RX7
(2)receiver
Shure P10R
Sennheiser ek2000
(3)recorders
Marntz PMD706

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #6 on: May 02, 2007, 07:52:16 AM »

This is the microphone I have used in my binaural microphones since the beginning of my company.. They are an outstanding microphone a frequency response of 20hz to 40khz.. +- 5 db or so not to bad... I do my 4.7 k mod to them to increase the SPL handing of the mic.. its a very good capsule.. If you want any tips on how to do that mod let me know. Matching them is very important part of getting a good balanced recording. Its funny more people have not tried these... :)

Chris


Hi Chris
I am not a tech guy and will never be very soon.  But I would love to hear anything that could make a better recording with this microphone.  You always seem to be way far ahead of me.  If it is not too much to ask, please share that big secret with me. 
The price I paid for EM-123 is only a fraction of that I paid for other microphones.  Yet this omni-directional microphone can handle with higher sound pressure (the sensitivity;-63db) and capture a lot more bass and decent highs. 

So I have three sets of microphone now;
EM-123 (omni) 
AT943 (card & hyper card)
AT843 (card)
I read about matrix recordings and am interested in doing it myself.  Tonight I will mix two sources (EM-123+AT943 card) to see how the omni & card-configure works out.
Koichi


Your preamp is on the way :)

I dont know much about blending omni can cardioid together but I would say a jecklin disk or some boundary between the two omni mics would be essential. I would use a Styrofoam dummy head like the ones you can get at a costume shop. Mount the em123 on ether side of it. That's all I can tell you.. I think your going to have to expairiment. And see what works best.

Chris
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline MJ

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 207
  • Gender: Male
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #7 on: May 02, 2007, 12:33:13 PM »
OK I mixed two sources using the latest version of Sound Forge.
It sounds great (at least to my ears) ;D ;D!!!  Now I would try to record with EM-123s and AT943s or AT853s if possible. ::) ::)

Band : Europe
Date : April 20th 2007
Venue:Osaka Kouseinenkin Kaian Osaka Japan
The 1st Source;
SP-CMC8 (AT 943s/Card)>Nady Phantom Power Adapters>Denecke PS2 Mini >TCD-D100
The Second Source;
EM-123 >BB>TCD-D8

Here are MP3 sound samples.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/bjs71h

http://www.sendspace.com/file/4tvioh

http://www.sendspace.com/file/fvobkm

TDC-D8 is too big to carry around.  I bet the smaller degital recorder must be the next step to take 8) 8) 8)
Koichi
« Last Edit: May 02, 2007, 12:34:57 PM by rocknrolljourney »
<Main Rigs>
Schoeps MK4s>(Nbox Active cables)>Nbox+ or Nbox Platinum>Izzy (Split) Cables>Sony PCM-M10 or Sony PCM-D100

<Sub Rigs>
(1)DPA4061s>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)>Church Audio Pre>(3.5 stereo mini+Canare cable + 3.5 stereo mini)>Sony PCM-M10
(2)DSM-6S/L>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)> Sony PCM-M10

<IEM>
(1)scanner
 DJ-X2000
 IC-RX7
(2)receiver
Shure P10R
Sennheiser ek2000
(3)recorders
Marntz PMD706

Offline MJ

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 207
  • Gender: Male
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2007, 11:48:21 PM »
Looks like a Primo part number...

http://www.primomic.com/products/em-123.htm

Probably my EM123 is not a Primo part.

The sensitivity of a Primo part is -43dB while that of my EM-123 is said to be -63±3dB.

Last night I went to a Stevie Salas show at the local club and recorded it a few feet away from the band.

EM-123>BB>TCD-D100

The music was way too loud for a small club show but no brickwall.  It sounds very good to my ears IMO.

Koichi



<Main Rigs>
Schoeps MK4s>(Nbox Active cables)>Nbox+ or Nbox Platinum>Izzy (Split) Cables>Sony PCM-M10 or Sony PCM-D100

<Sub Rigs>
(1)DPA4061s>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)>Church Audio Pre>(3.5 stereo mini+Canare cable + 3.5 stereo mini)>Sony PCM-M10
(2)DSM-6S/L>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)> Sony PCM-M10

<IEM>
(1)scanner
 DJ-X2000
 IC-RX7
(2)receiver
Shure P10R
Sennheiser ek2000
(3)recorders
Marntz PMD706

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #9 on: May 08, 2007, 01:01:20 AM »
Looks like a Primo part number...

http://www.primomic.com/products/em-123.htm

Probably my EM123 is not a Primo part.

The sensitivity of a Primo part is -43dB while that of my EM-123 is said to be -63±3dB.

Last night I went to a Stevie Salas show at the local club and recorded it a few feet away from the band.

EM-123>BB>TCD-D100

The music was way too loud for a small club show but no brickwall.  It sounds very good to my ears IMO.

Koichi





Primo made lots of sensitivity ratings based on OEM demand.

Chris
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline MJ

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 207
  • Gender: Male
Re: EM-123 ????
« Reply #10 on: May 08, 2007, 01:57:44 AM »
Looks like a Primo part number...

http://www.primomic.com/products/em-123.htm

Probably my EM123 is not a Primo part.

The sensitivity of a Primo part is -43dB while that of my EM-123 is said to be -63±3dB.

Last night I went to a Stevie Salas show at the local club and recorded it a few feet away from the band.

EM-123>BB>TCD-D100

The music was way too loud for a small club show but no brickwall.  It sounds very good to my ears IMO.

Koichi





Primo made lots of sensitivity ratings based on OEM demand.

Chris


Thanks, Chris.  I learn something new every day.

Koichi
« Last Edit: May 08, 2007, 01:59:35 AM by rocknrolljourney »
<Main Rigs>
Schoeps MK4s>(Nbox Active cables)>Nbox+ or Nbox Platinum>Izzy (Split) Cables>Sony PCM-M10 or Sony PCM-D100

<Sub Rigs>
(1)DPA4061s>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)>Church Audio Pre>(3.5 stereo mini+Canare cable + 3.5 stereo mini)>Sony PCM-M10
(2)DSM-6S/L>(terminated with 3.5 stereo mini)> Sony PCM-M10

<IEM>
(1)scanner
 DJ-X2000
 IC-RX7
(2)receiver
Shure P10R
Sennheiser ek2000
(3)recorders
Marntz PMD706

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 36 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF