Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: evolution of the squeezebox  (Read 7933 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
evolution of the squeezebox
« on: March 01, 2008, 10:31:16 AM »
http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_duet.html

just picked one up.
love the remote!

to all you folks on "the wheel" project.
add this to your list of things to buy.
:)

Offline lnarachi

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 55
  • Gender: Male
  • Pullin one for the team
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2008, 11:45:44 AM »
Nick, are you using the wireless or wired ethernet connection?
Do you have to use the wire to get fidelity on 24 bit flac files?

My friend has the earlier SB3 and isn't happy with the fidelity compared to his CD transport.

He isn't using the DAC on the SB.

Have you compared a file via the SB versus a CD you make from the file on your playback rig?

Thanks
Larry
mk4v/mk2h/mk8/mk41v CMC6 > Grace V2/V3 Oade ASM mod > Benchmark AD2K+ > SD 744T/Edirol R09

Playback: Northstar Designs M192 transport and DAC >  Cardas Neutral Reference interconnects > Cary Audio SLP98 > Pass Labs X250 > Acoustic Zen Satori cables > Von Schweikert VR4

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2008, 12:38:11 PM »
just ordered it...so time will tell.
I'll probably use a wired jack as proximity to my router is pretty close to the stereo any way.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2008, 12:48:04 PM »
Have you compared a file via the SB versus a CD you make from the file on your playback rig?

I compared SB3, wired and wireless, digital out v. CD/DVD transport digital out to the same gear.  I couldn't hear a difference.  Could be my playback gear, environment, and ears simply aren't capable of revealing the differences (if they actually exist).
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline bgalizio

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3555
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/spyboychoir
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2008, 06:41:56 PM »
Have you compared a file via the SB versus a CD you make from the file on your playback rig?

I compared SB3, wired and wireless, digital out v. CD/DVD transport digital out to the same gear.  I couldn't hear a difference.  Could be my playback gear, environment, and ears simply aren't capable of revealing the differences (if they actually exist).

Same here as well. Also, you can easily do 24bit FLACs wirelessly through the SB3. The SB3 is limited to 24/48 content, though, as it resamples 24/96 down to 24/48 on the fly. Not sure if that's the case with the new Duet or the Transporter.

Offline run_run_run

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5253
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2008, 07:25:12 PM »
I need one, the remote looks A+

Offline Jammin72

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2008, 09:22:39 AM »
The Duet uses a different output circuit (DAC and Analog Output Stage) than the SB3.  I would only use it if you're planning on feeding a digital signal to your rig.  The control setup is slick though... one remote controls all the output boxes and no more staring across the room at the little display!

As far as digital output quality even folks like Wes Phillips and John Atkinson over at Stereophile use terms like "slight" and "a little" to describe the difference of the digital output in the SB3 over some of their favorite transports when being sent into more advanced DAC's and reference systems.

Yes, but what do you HEAR?

Offline Since85

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 242
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2008, 09:29:57 AM »
So,

You would go analog out with an SB3, but digital out with the new duet?

Also, The transporter does 24/96 natively, and has a really high end (supposedly) D/A converter, thus the really high price tag...

Some company called Boulder Cables does mods to the SB3. I have also seen other 3rd party power supplies as well. Any opinions?
http://www.boldercables.com/servlet/Search?category=MODIFICATIONS
http://www.welbornelabs.com/modsandmodules.htm

I really want to get one of these (squeezebox or duet), but do not know which way to go, and insights appreciated!!

Besides having the Dead catalog on a hard drive someday (wheel project), I would love to stream my 24/48 masters to the stereo as well.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2008, 09:31:32 AM by Since85 »

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2008, 10:06:53 AM »
nope, I plan analog out for now...digital out when I get a good DAC in my system again.

Offline som

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 852
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2008, 11:18:53 AM »
<<<sigh>>>

I feel so old....I just can't get away from the need to have a piece of physical media. My LPs and CDs would look so sad, watching from their dusty shelves while the Squeezebox has all the fun.



Wait....I AM old!

AT ES943/C's > Church Audio ST-9100 > iRiver H100 (Rockboxed)

Offline Jammin72

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2008, 12:13:28 PM »
So,

You would go analog out with an SB3, but digital out with the new duet?

Also, The transporter does 24/96 natively, and has a really high end (supposedly) D/A converter, thus the really high price tag...

Some company called Boulder Cables does mods to the SB3. I have also seen other 3rd party power supplies as well. Any opinions?
http://www.boldercables.com/servlet/Search?category=MODIFICATIONS
http://www.welbornelabs.com/modsandmodules.htm

I really want to get one of these (squeezebox or duet), but do not know which way to go, and insights appreciated!!

Besides having the Dead catalog on a hard drive someday (wheel project), I would love to stream my 24/48 masters to the stereo as well.

I'd go digital out of either box if I could and use it strictly as a "transport".  I was just pointing out what has been discussed on the Slim Devices forum, that the new Box doesn't have quite the sound analog of it's previous cousin. (Though I'm sure like most things audio it's minimal) The good news is that the new remote will still operate the older boxes. Since the new boxes are less expensive it makes it easier to setup multiple setups in the home.

You're right the Transporter is right up there with many reference sources but of course it's not cheap.  The Truth mod by Modwright with a tube stage seems intriguing...



http://www.modwright.com/products/index.php?product_id=28



Yes, but what do you HEAR?

Offline BC

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Gender: Male
  • Bongo Bongo
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2008, 01:26:40 PM »

Also, The transporter does 24/96 natively, and has a really high end (supposedly) D/A converter, thus the really high price tag...



As far as it's measured performance it is in the same league as any DAC separates: Benchmark DAC1, Bel Canto v3, and more. Very impressive IMHO.

http://stereophile.com/mediaservers/207slim/

This is some kick-ass resolution!!

Fig.3 Slim Devices Transporter, 1/3-octave spectrum with noise and spuriae of (from top to bottom at 3kHz): dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS, 16-bit data; dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS, 24-bit data; dithered 1kHz tone at –120dBFS, 24-bit data. (Right channel dashed.)
« Last Edit: March 04, 2008, 01:28:12 PM by BC »
In: DPA4022>V3>Microtracker/D8

Out: Morrison ELAD>Adcom GFA555mkII>Martin Logan Aerius i

Offline Since85

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 242
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2008, 10:15:42 AM »
OK,

But are any of those power supply/other mods woth the $? Is it just better to spend the $$ on a transporter?

Also, is there a mod possible to make the squeezebox capable of 24/96? Any thoughts/insights appreciated!!
 
Nick, what made you decide to go with the duet vs. a squeezebox? Could one just get a squeezebox, and but that remote separately?


:)


Offline Since85

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 242
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2008, 10:24:06 AM »
Sorry to flood the forum, but this PS looks very interesting.....

http://www.musicdirect.com/product/80596


What y'all think????

Offline Colin Liston

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #14 on: March 05, 2008, 10:36:13 AM »
Occasionally....music mics record

johnlynn

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2008, 10:25:03 AM »
I just went to the slimdevices site to upgrade my software and it appears you can buy this new Duet as two solo units. For those that don't need the fancy remote with the Duet or don't want to spend $300 for the SB3, the base (stereo/network interface box) of the Duet is available for $149. This is great for those that install the server software on a laptop or have their PC near or in their listening room. All functions of the squeezeboxes can be controlled easily via a web-style interface.

I've had my SB3 for about a year and love it. I'd recommend one to anyone on this site. 

Offline Since85

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 242
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #16 on: March 25, 2008, 11:02:11 PM »
Still wondering about any opinions on mods for the squeezebox. Worth the $$ or not ??? ???

Also, how does it handle a 24/96 file? Does it convert to 24/48 on the fly? If so, does it sound OK?

Thanks for any info.



Offline scervin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2008, 10:24:14 PM »
I heard a squeezebox>Bel Canto Pre/DAC 3>Pass Labs X350.5>Salk HT3's this past weekend and it sounded great!!  Question is how do you get the tunes from CD to the HD with all the artist info?

 I upgraded my old '99 version of EAC to the latest and found that I can rip compressed and it converts the file to FLAC....sweet!  I used freedb to get the artist info, but how is everyone else doing this?  Once you get the files do you DL the squeezebox software (like itunes) and you are ready to go.  Might get this Duet for multiple rooms and to get the CD's out of my basement.

Thanks,
SC

Offline cheshirecat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1210
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2008, 11:11:59 PM »
Still wondering about any opinions on mods for the squeezebox. Worth the $$ or not ??? ???

Also, how does it handle a 24/96 file? Does it convert to 24/48 on the fly? If so, does it sound OK?

Thanks for any info.




Most of the mods to the SB2/3 are the typical things that you would find in any mod for audio gear; different caps.  Sure they will change the sound a bit, is it a must have, I'd say no.  Is it worth it... meh.

I did pick up an elpac power supply for the thing, hacked off the end and defeated the 12V sections to give me a straight up 5v power supply.  Sure there was maybe a little difference, but I'm sure that may have more to do with the fact that elpac puts out a solid 5.00V wheras the stock power supply was ~5.2V... go figure and with all mods YMMV.
SB2 / Rega P1 > Modified Dynaco PAS2 > Modified Dynaco MK-IV monoblocks> Axiom M22 v2

Offline rasta

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 279
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #19 on: April 02, 2008, 01:47:43 PM »
I've heard there is trouble w/ MAC's and the SB3's.  Anybody using OSX leopard?
4023>m148>722

Offline bgalizio

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3555
  • Gender: Male
    • http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/spyboychoir
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #20 on: April 02, 2008, 02:09:58 PM »
I've heard there is trouble w/ MAC's and the SB3's.  Anybody using OSX leopard?

Yes, I use a Mac with 10.5.2. and a SB3. No problems on my end.

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #21 on: April 02, 2008, 03:44:34 PM »
I heard a squeezebox>Bel Canto Pre/DAC 3>Pass Labs X350.5>Salk HT3's this past weekend and it sounded great!!  Question is how do you get the tunes from CD to the HD with all the artist info?

 I upgraded my old '99 version of EAC to the latest and found that I can rip compressed and it converts the file to FLAC....sweet!  I used freedb to get the artist info, but how is everyone else doing this?  Once you get the files do you DL the squeezebox software (like itunes) and you are ready to go.  Might get this Duet for multiple rooms and to get the CD's out of my basement.

Thanks,
SC

scott, is this what you're talking about http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,91895.0.html
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline lnarachi

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 55
  • Gender: Male
  • Pullin one for the team
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #22 on: April 02, 2008, 05:21:40 PM »
I took a pass on the Duet after hearing it on a friends stereo. Instead, I went with a device that takes the USB out from my computer and converts it to AES/EBU digital out.

http://www.cryo-parts.com/pclink.html


Since I have a DAC (Northstar Design M192) that has the AES/EBU input, I just run that cable the 50 feet or so from the computer to the DAC.

CONS: I have to select music from the computer instead of a cool remote....I remote desktop with a small laptop to the music server and use Foobar to play my files.

PROS: This box was only 129 bucks..not the 400 the Duet costs..
Sound quality is not compromised.
mk4v/mk2h/mk8/mk41v CMC6 > Grace V2/V3 Oade ASM mod > Benchmark AD2K+ > SD 744T/Edirol R09

Playback: Northstar Designs M192 transport and DAC >  Cardas Neutral Reference interconnects > Cary Audio SLP98 > Pass Labs X250 > Acoustic Zen Satori cables > Von Schweikert VR4

Offline scervin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #23 on: April 02, 2008, 07:13:13 PM »
I took a pass on the Duet after hearing it on a friends stereo. Instead, I went with a device that takes the USB out from my computer and converts it to AES/EBU digital out.

http://www.cryo-parts.com/pclink.html


Since I have a DAC (Northstar Design M192) that has the AES/EBU input, I just run that cable the 50 feet or so from the computer to the DAC.

CONS: I have to select music from the computer instead of a cool remote....I remote desktop with a small laptop to the music server and use Foobar to play my files.

PROS: This box was only 129 bucks..not the 400 the Duet costs..
Sound quality is not compromised.

Please explain the sound "compromise".  Going digi out to the Bel Canto sounded better than the Raysonic to many ears.  CI Audio PS was utilized.

I'll be waiting to hear Nick' comments as well.

Offline pfife

  • Emperor of Ticketucky
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12354
  • I love/hate tickets.
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #24 on: April 03, 2008, 03:23:34 PM »

 I upgraded my old '99 version of EAC to the latest and found that I can rip compressed and it converts the file to FLAC....sweet!  I used freedb to get the artist info, but how is everyone else doing this?  Once you get the files do you DL the squeezebox software (like itunes) and you are ready to go.  Might get this Duet for multiple rooms and to get the CD's out of my basement.


yes, thats exactly what I did.   Slimserver (the squeezebox software) is functionally exactly like Itunes.   You designate your music directory, and it reads all of the tags for the songs, and creates a library.   You can set it up to scan for new stuff every day, so all you do is put new files in the directory and it will pick them up itself, or you can tell it to scan if you wanna listen to something right away that you just added.

Slimserver also allows you to stream your music anywhere.

Once slimserver is set up, when you initially start up your sb3 (or other product, presumably) you just tell the sb3 which computer on your network is running slimserver, and it connects.  Then you browse through the library using artist or song or album or whatev.


« Last Edit: April 03, 2008, 03:26:16 PM by Ticket-obsessed TS.com poster »
Tickets are dead to me.  Except the ones I have, don't have, and lost.  Not to mention the ones you have, don't have, and lost.   And the ones that other dude has, doesn't have, and lost.  Let me know if you need some tickets, I'm happy to oblige. 

Tickets >>>>>>>> Oxygen

Offline scervin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #25 on: April 03, 2008, 09:27:50 PM »

 I upgraded my old '99 version of EAC to the latest and found that I can rip compressed and it converts the file to FLAC....sweet!  I used freedb to get the artist info, but how is everyone else doing this?  Once you get the files do you DL the squeezebox software (like itunes) and you are ready to go.  Might get this Duet for multiple rooms and to get the CD's out of my basement.


yes, thats exactly what I did.   Slimserver (the squeezebox software) is functionally exactly like Itunes.   You designate your music directory, and it reads all of the tags for the songs, and creates a library.   You can set it up to scan for new stuff every day, so all you do is put new files in the directory and it will pick them up itself, or you can tell it to scan if you wanna listen to something right away that you just added.

Slimserver also allows you to stream your music anywhere.

Once slimserver is set up, when you initially start up your sb3 (or other product, presumably) you just tell the sb3 which computer on your network is running slimserver, and it connects.  Then you browse through the library using artist or song or album or whatev.




My reason for going with the Duet is that I plan to have a PC in the spare bedroom closet and use it like a server so no laptop to choose songs.  The display would be behind locked rack door so I like the idea of having it all on the remote.

Can't wait to hear more about this.  Sounds pretty neat.

Offline rasta

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 279
  • Gender: Male
Re: evolution of the squeezebox
« Reply #26 on: April 04, 2008, 01:04:31 PM »
If I want to run the Duet or the SB3 into my own DAC is one a smarter option than the other?  (less expensive if not paying for the DAC)
4023>m148>722

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.111 seconds with 52 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF