well, .there are only a handful of recorders that record to DSD as an option..
Genex 9048, Tascam DV-RA1000,Tascam DS-D98. they all appear plenty professional....and I know plenty of professionals that use em..the genex is many thousands of dollars, and for my money...not worth it..as i am just looking for the DSD version of a tape machine to capture my mixdowns on....now what can be improved on are the DSD ADC Converters..but the recorder is just a capture device. they are all
professional.
this is a way for more recording studios to integrate DSD(noone wants to pay 10,000 dollars for the genex beast), and for some of the average joe sixpacks to be made aware of the benefits of the format.. i hope it sticks this time.
it is very much worth it to me, so I am going to keep the capability as long as the format is around .the difference is really stunning...not going to bother with a multitrack DSD machine yet, but a 2track is definitely going to stay with me.
yeah, it is primarily for recording professionals who send work off to mastering houses with SACD capability. though this may help cause a paradigm shift.
So if I cannot edit DSD streams (cut off the parts before and after the interesting parts) nor process a DSD stream (EQ, compress, etc) if necessary, the device is `just` a glorified iRiver H120? (not to be negative, it will certainly work well and sound very good)
well, aside from the fact that DSD sounds so much better than PCM.. I mean, not even close. DSD is superior in that regard(to redbook pcm)
I share udovdh's perspective. I don't doubt it sounds far superior to PCM. But without the ability to edit the recording, or author SACD playback (and for me, I won't go back to media-based playback, so I'd want some sort of PC-based SACD playback), this is not the device for me. I hope the technology and products evolve over time. I'd love to make DSD recordings if they sound so darn good. But not until it becomes usable in a way that meets my requirements. I'm sure those who have different requirements, and for whom the current current technology and products addresses their requirements, will take advantage and use these devices.
Therein lies the problem - these devices appear to be much more "consumer" or "prosumer" rather than for recording professionals. If I'm sending my work to be mastered to SACD (for what is probably a large sum of money), I'd probably also be recording to DSD using much higher quality gear.
Until consumers can edit the DSD stream and author it to SACD and/or listen to it via some media-free transport, recording to DSD is essentially worthless for the consumer. It's somewhat like recording to a DAT in 16/44 or 16/48, but having no way to listen to it unless you convert to mp3.