Why would the recorder you're giving the patch to have to be 24 bit? You're feeding it an analog signal, for it to run through it's own ADC. AFAIK, there is no difference (from the patching recorder's point of view) between an anlog signal coming from a 16 bit device and an analog signal coming from a 24 bit device. Analog is analog. Am I wrong?
matt, the 671 doesn't have a true analog out, ala the ua5. the signal has to pass through the a/d; atleast that's what doug said.
Correct. However, to give an analog out (headphones, RCA's) the signal must also pass through a DAC. Whether or not it's a "true" analog out or not has nothing to do with what type of recorder it can be recived by (the original question I was answering). As I said before, analog is analog and if your recorder can take an analog signal, it will be able to patch into the 671, without
having to be a 24 bit recorder. I have fed both my Archos Gmini400 (16 bit) and my D5 (analog) with my 671. Yes, the signal went through the 671's ADC and then DAC and probably gained some artifacts in the process by not being a true analog pass-through, but each box took the signal just fine.