Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?  (Read 5961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« on: July 25, 2007, 12:56:41 PM »
looking for something to use as a sbd patch device...

ua5 > ???

thanks, in advance, for any input, advice and/or insight.
-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline BWolf

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5965
  • Gender: Male
  • Always on the prowl...
    • Etree Trading List
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2007, 01:14:26 PM »
you are going to get a lot of different answers on this.  i've never ever had any issues with my unit.  actually, its worked flawlessly since i got it and the only time i missed some music was user error. 

i've recorded at 16/44.1, 24/44.1, 24/48, and 24/96 and all have worked just fine for me.  YMMV.
"The best jazz is funky, and the best funk is jazzy" -SMOOTH
------------------------------------------------------
Neumann AK20/AK40s > LC3 > KM100 > Lunatec V3 (MS mod) > SD 722 or Microtrack 24/96  (Hi-Ho Silver Custom Interconnects)
------------------------------------------------------

Offline jmz93

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Gender: Male
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2007, 11:01:46 AM »
I ran mine S/PDIF-in at 24/48 and 24/96 all the time. no issues. It's for sale right now in Yard Sale, 4gb CF card, external battery, SP-dongle.

Offline desertsky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 142
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2007, 12:00:20 PM »
The MT is pretty reliable.  The one issue you'll face recording at 24/48 or 24/96 is the 2GB file split.  It's not a seamless split.  You'll have to manually stop and restart during a break between songs or risk losing a few seconds in the middle of a song if you let the MT do the automatic split.  That split will happen an hour into recording at 24/96.  About 2 hours at 24/48.   The 2GB file split issue is one of the reasons I sold my MT and upgraded to a Korg MR-1 which does seamless splits.
DPA 4061's, MMA6000 pre, Korg-MR2

Offline dallman

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • *
  • Posts: 1816
  • Gender: Male
    • Clifford Morse
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2007, 12:12:19 PM »
I have always found the unit to surpass my expectations. I generally use it in 2 applicatons these days, to patch (s/pdif) or to stealth (see my signature below). It does both very well. ;D
Support Live Music: Tape A Show Today!
Deck>possibly something here> Mics

Offline jhirte

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2274
  • Gender: Male
  • At ease atleast yeah.
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2007, 12:28:22 PM »
I've run mine once at 24/96 w/o issues... I got lucky in that the show ended after 52 minutes, so no file split bs.

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2007, 01:00:55 PM »
The MT is pretty reliable.  The one issue you'll face recording at 24/48 or 24/96 is the 2GB file split.  It's not a seamless split.  You'll have to manually stop and restart during a break between songs or risk losing a few seconds in the middle of a song if you let the MT do the automatic split.  That split will happen an hour into recording at 24/96.  About 2 hours at 24/48.   The 2GB file split issue is one of the reasons I sold my MT and upgraded to a Korg MR-1 which does seamless splits.


oh, you are kidding! that is unacceptable for my purposes... is there a firmware update that will fix this, or is this the way it is..?


thanks for all the input - +T's all 'round.
-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline BC

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Gender: Male
  • Bongo Bongo
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2007, 01:09:54 PM »
The MT is pretty reliable.  The one issue you'll face recording at 24/48 or 24/96 is the 2GB file split.  It's not a seamless split.  You'll have to manually stop and restart during a break between songs or risk losing a few seconds in the middle of a song if you let the MT do the automatic split.  That split will happen an hour into recording at 24/96.  About 2 hours at 24/48.   The 2GB file split issue is one of the reasons I sold my MT and upgraded to a Korg MR-1 which does seamless splits.


oh, you are kidding! that is unacceptable for my purposes... is there a firmware update that will fix this, or is this the way it is..?


thanks for all the input - +T's all 'round.


sorry, that's the way it is. Biggest problem with the MT IMHO.


In: DPA4022>V3>Microtracker/D8

Out: Morrison ELAD>Adcom GFA555mkII>Martin Logan Aerius i

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2007, 01:20:53 PM »
ok.

time to explore other options.

thanks again.

-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline willndmb

  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6792
  • Gender: Male
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2007, 02:20:07 PM »
i love my MT
the seemless split does suck but is pretty easy to work around

what 8gb or higher cards are people using?
Mics - AKG ck61/ck63 (c480b & Naiant actives), SP-BMC-2
XLR Cables - Silver Path w/Darktrain stubbies
Interconnect Cables - Dogstar (XLR), Darktrain (RCA > 1/8) (1/8 > 1/8), and Kind Kables (1/8f > 1/4)
Preamps - Naiant Littlebox & Tinybox
Recorders - PCM-M10 & DR-60D

Offline audBall

  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 6479
  • Gender: Male
  • Feel brand new about it
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #10 on: July 26, 2007, 02:24:35 PM »
I'm curious to see what's up with Ver. 2, although there's no info on it yet that I know of.
mg m20.21.23 ■ akg ck61.62.63 »  nbob■naiant
aercomp2 ■ v2∞3 ■ sx-m2d2
d100 ■ pmd661 ■ r44ocm ■ f3

Offline bdasilva

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1358
  • Gender: Male
  • Use to be a Fishhead
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #11 on: July 26, 2007, 02:38:45 PM »
The "Split" is 6 seconds and can be done with a double push of a button... come on... you can find a 6 second hole in a show. This is no dealbreaker. And they are dirt cheap. other than the pres I've never had problems with mine that I didn't cause. Great  bitbucket behind a decent pre - a/d.    My .02
Cad E300S set.. AT822  AKG C 414 B-XLS/ST  
Dorsey-Mod MK-012 w/ O, C, H and RED L/D Caps
Superlux S502 ORTF   LSD2
Silverpath  Cables> 
Tascam DR-680MKii    DR- 680 (X2)   Tascam DR-40     Sound Devices USBPre    SONY  PMD-M10   Zoom F8

"Buy a Taper a Drink... Prime the Pumps of live Music"


               On the "music" side of the "Music Business"

Offline JackoRoses

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2836
  • Gender: Male
  • lost cause
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #12 on: July 26, 2007, 02:47:54 PM »
The "Split" is 6 seconds and can be done with a double push of a button... come on... you can find a 6 second hole in a show. This is no dealbreaker. And they are dirt cheap. other than the pres I've never had problems with mine that I didn't cause. Great  bitbucket behind a decent pre - a/d.    My .02
it's not a dealbreaker if it's your primary unit, but if you want to use it as a backup for say sbd recordings so you can do a matrix it would be a deal breaker because you are focusing on your main "rig" and trying to remember to hightail it back over to the board at 55 mins isn't exactly an ideal situation.
That's my take on it at least.
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/jackoroses
AKG ck61's/ck62's/ck63's/480b's > zaolla's/Dogstar silver cables > optimod V3  > zaolla spdif> HD-P2
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. "
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Big Brother is here and he is watching you.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #13 on: July 26, 2007, 03:00:02 PM »
but if you want to use it as a backup for say sbd recordings so you can do a matrix it would be a deal breaker because you are focusing on your main "rig" and trying to remember to hightail it back over to the board at 55 mins isn't exactly an ideal situation.

I thought one of the firmware updates added an auto-split feature?  Not seamless, but as a secondary source mixing into a primary source, the 6-sec auto-split might not be a huge deal to some.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #14 on: July 26, 2007, 03:45:55 PM »
The "Split" is 6 seconds and can be done with a double push of a button... come on... you can find a 6 second hole in a show. This is no dealbreaker. And they are dirt cheap. other than the pres I've never had problems with mine that I didn't cause. Great  bitbucket behind a decent pre - a/d.    My .02
it's not a dealbreaker if it's your primary unit, but if you want to use it as a backup for say sbd recordings so you can do a matrix it would be a deal breaker because you are focusing on your main "rig" and trying to remember to hightail it back over to the board at 55 mins isn't exactly an ideal situation.
That's my take on it at least.


ding!  this is exactly what iwanted the thing for...

-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline willndmb

  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6792
  • Gender: Male
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #15 on: July 26, 2007, 05:31:19 PM »
but if you want to use it as a backup for say sbd recordings so you can do a matrix it would be a deal breaker because you are focusing on your main "rig" and trying to remember to hightail it back over to the board at 55 mins isn't exactly an ideal situation.

I thought one of the firmware updates added an auto-split feature?  Not seamless, but as a secondary source mixing into a primary source, the 6-sec auto-split might not be a huge deal to some.
i THINK this is true, i never tried it but i recall reading about it
Mics - AKG ck61/ck63 (c480b & Naiant actives), SP-BMC-2
XLR Cables - Silver Path w/Darktrain stubbies
Interconnect Cables - Dogstar (XLR), Darktrain (RCA > 1/8) (1/8 > 1/8), and Kind Kables (1/8f > 1/4)
Preamps - Naiant Littlebox & Tinybox
Recorders - PCM-M10 & DR-60D

Offline pool

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 169
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #16 on: July 27, 2007, 02:38:42 AM »
The MT can be fully reliable.
The MT can be fully non-reliable.
It depends on your luck and which category you happen to find yourself in. Mine was the 2nd. The battery went DEAD and BOOTING CRASHED after 3 months. Simple as that. Had to return to seller cause it was beyond any logical explanation.

Offline Nick Graham

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 4068
  • Gender: Male
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #17 on: July 28, 2007, 07:49:36 PM »
Brian's right, one of the more recent firmware updates did introduce a auto file split at 2 GB. However, the split isn't seamless. If I recall correctly the auto start/stop takes roughly 20 seconds....so if you hit the 2 GB point in the middle of a song you're gonna lost that 20 seconds of music.
Right now nothing...in the past: Schoeps CMC6, AKG 480, AKG 460, AKG 414, MBHO 603a, Neumann KM100, ADK TL>Schoeps MK4, Schoeps MK2, Schoeps MK41, AKG ck61, AKG ck62, AKG ck63, Neumann AK40, Neumann AK50, MBHO ka200>Lunatec V2, Lunatec V3, Apogee Mini-Me, Oade M148, Oade M248, Sound Devices MP2, Sonosax SXM2>Sony (mod)SBM1, Apogee AD500>D7, D8, D100, M1, R1, R4, R09, iRiver HP120, Microtrack

Offline Mr. Bull

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Gender: Male
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #18 on: July 28, 2007, 08:12:55 PM »
I allways worked around the split and have been able to do great recording with it.  With all the filmware updates it pretty relaible now.  Batterie Pack is essential.  I have made allot of amature mistakes with it like hitting the pause button in the middle of recording not using the hold button deleting the shows ect.  All the unrealiablity came from me.
Main Rig
Studio Project C4's>Audio Technica XLR>UA-5 Digimod>MircroTrack I 24/96

Stealth Rig
Cardioids CA-11 MICS>CA-9100Pre Amp>iRiver H115

Offline coloartist

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2067
  • MGoldey -"you can shove those mics up your ass
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #19 on: July 30, 2007, 03:51:01 AM »
I just use mine as a backup now, but if you want to use it for a matrix, run it at 24/48. You get 1:55. You wouldn't be using it at every show it sounds like. 24/48 sounds pretty damn close to 24/96 as far as I can tell. I still record at 24/96 now since I got the HD-P2, but 24/48 sounded great when I didn't have the HD-P2.
mk4>Kwon/din a/din>kc5>cmc6>kindkables XLR>788T
mk22>Kwon/NOS>kc5>cmc6>kindkablesXLR>788t                                                     
Canon XH-A1 Sony AX100                       
Samsung Backlit LED 55">Pioneer Elite SC-27>Snell Acoustics E.5  Series

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • Trade Count: (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6205
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2007, 01:39:29 AM »
ive had mixed results. it usually works, but every once in awhile will tweak out.

its not nearly as relaible as say a pda or vx pocket
Unable to post or PM due to arbitrary censorship of people the mod doesn't like. Please email me using the link in my profile if you need to connect

Offline jmz93

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Gender: Male
Re: are microtrackers reliable @ 24/96..?
« Reply #21 on: August 02, 2007, 05:57:40 AM »
Mine was always reliable s/pdif in at 24/48 or 24/96. and hey, it's for sale in the Yardsale section of this site.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.156 seconds with 47 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF