Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Quick 8040 comparison  (Read 2051 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Quick 8040 comparison
« on: February 26, 2008, 11:10:54 AM »
I was helping do some VO work this weekend and decided to do a quick test since I had things setup. I have not processed either of these samples. I tend to use the AudioTechnica 4040 for recording voice overs, but was very impressed by the Sennheiser 8040. Now I just have to find the right opportunity to use it in the field.

MP3 files:

http://homepage.mac.com/wayneb/SEN8040.mp3
http://homepage.mac.com/wayneb/AT4040.mp3

Raw Broadcast WAV files:

http://homepage.mac.com/wayneb/SEN8040.WAV
http://homepage.mac.com/wayneb/AT4040.WAV

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

Offline rokpunk

  • WOULD HIT IT
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9262
  • Gender: Male
Re: Quick 8040 comparison
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2008, 11:30:10 AM »
the 8040 track sounds more "in your face"...like she is standing right next to me.
it's amazing that both of these mics will translate into spanish like they did     :P
The new and improved taperssection.com....now with freedom of speech without the repercussion of -T's!



again, your showing your cluelessness.


Jah sitteth in Mount Zion
And rules all creation........

Offline John Willett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Gender: Male
  • Bio:
    • Sound-Link ProAudio
Re: Quick 8040 comparison
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2008, 11:35:15 AM »
The one thing you should notice with the MKH 8040 (and any other symmetrical capsule mic.) is the naturalness of the voice.

Back in 1985 when I first listened to the old MKH 40 demo CD I was struck how "real" the voice sounded when recorded with the MKH 40 compared to the other mics - which just sounded "wrong".

This was not mentioned in the CD at all as they were talking about self-noise at the time - it was just something I noticed.  So much so, that other mics sound distorted in comparison.

It was this that started me in my MKH mic. collection (I have 8 now, with another 4 on order).

I'm not sure if it will be clear with an MP3 as this distorts sound pretty horribly - but you should notice it in the original wav files.



Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Re: Quick 8040 comparison
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2008, 11:36:55 AM »
the 8040 track sounds more "in your face"...like she is standing right next to me.
it's amazing that both of these mics will translate into spanish like they did     :P

Every test I've done with the 8040 has me more in the camp that this could be the mic that really helps boost Sennheiser in the ENG community. The biggest challenge right now is finding a good shockmount for it. I have a Sennheiser model on order. In April when I'm at NAB, I'm going to look at the Rycote version and see what I think of it. For now, I'm using a KTEK K-SSM, which seems to work well when it's on a stand like it was for this test, but still transfers a lot of handling noise to the mic when on a boom.

But like you, I was amazed at the translation skills of these mics. Next thing know it will wash my dishes and take out the trash.  ;D

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

Offline keith

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: Quick 8040 comparison
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2008, 01:37:19 PM »
Was she the same distance from both mics?  It sounds as though she is farther from the AT4040, but that may just be the different characteristics of the mics.

I detect a little bit of popping with the Sennheiser, which adds to this perception.

Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Re: Quick 8040 comparison
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2008, 01:46:43 PM »
I was able to place the pop screen a bit closer to the mic, so she may have been a wee bit closer to the 8040.

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

Offline grider

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4570
  • Gender: Male
  • always give more than you take
Re: Quick 8040 comparison
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2008, 05:49:58 PM »
thanks to all who have been sharing their taping results with these mics with the rest of us, member Shawn Smith and I are considering buying a set of cards together, since he likes to tape jazz and I like transparent sounding mics, and since these mics offer a nice transparent sound, remote cables, and interchangeable caps, they might be the final mics we own, so far between us we have covered 480's, 460's, C4's, 391's, 393's, mk41's, A51TL's, and mk4v's, V3, MiniMe, UA5, R4, and JK Labs custom preamp, I think we're both looking for the final solution to our taping needs, we'll see if Sennheiser's are the keepers soon

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.061 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF