Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Recording levels + post-processing  (Read 5682 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline willndmb

  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6792
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recording levels + post-processing
« Reply #15 on: March 14, 2007, 09:20:44 AM »
i am with TJ
i like to run "hot" - peaks flicking the 0db light on
part of it is because i don't like to mess around after the fact
part because i have had and heard recording where you had to crack it and then of course you also hear the white noise more
i know its a risk and i try to lower it down some but its hard to break the habbit
Mics - AKG ck61/ck63 (c480b & Naiant actives), SP-BMC-2
XLR Cables - Silver Path w/Darktrain stubbies
Interconnect Cables - Dogstar (XLR), Darktrain (RCA > 1/8) (1/8 > 1/8), and Kind Kables (1/8f > 1/4)
Preamps - Naiant Littlebox & Tinybox
Recorders - PCM-M10 & DR-60D

Offline Jammin72

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recording levels + post-processing
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2007, 12:18:00 PM »


Here's the Post Production Results if anyone's interested.

http://www.archive.org/details/moe2007-03-10.akg483.flac16
Yes, but what do you HEAR?

Offline momule

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2178
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recording levels + post-processing
« Reply #17 on: March 14, 2007, 05:47:02 PM »
I just don't understand when folks say they are looking to make it most accurately represent how it sounded that night.  Yet most of the tapes I hear are so boomy ya cant enjoy it or there so thin they are fatiguing to the ear. 

If the engineer mixed a show that sounded anything like alot of the aud tapes most of them would be out of work.

The one that gets me the most is when folks take a SBD patch and then put it into circulation at about half the volume it was intended to be.   I'm pretty sure that aint how Ben mixed it. 

original that was seeded.
http://www.kctaper.com/levels_sample01.mp3
My interpretation.
http://www.kctaper.com/levels_sample02.mp3



AKG 463's (uno ck62) > Mackie Onyx Satellite > Microtrack II

Offline nem

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 192
Re: Recording levels + post-processing
« Reply #18 on: March 14, 2007, 08:56:54 PM »
I had issues with too many lows until I decided to use the wonderful option on my C4's called the "bass rolloff". wow, what a difference.

running live with orange lights steady on the 660

this thread rocks +'s abound.

_________
averaged at around -3, peak just barely kisses 0, not post edit whatsoever (except to make the mp3 sample)

sometimes they get deep inside a jam and there is no such thing as up or down, just a momentary endless floating in perfect space
BSC1>cables!>acm660/busmod660/D7

Offline Jammin72

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recording levels + post-processing
« Reply #19 on: March 20, 2007, 09:41:45 PM »

If the engineer mixed a show that sounded anything like alot of the aud tapes most of them would be out of work.





Unfortunately... this simply isn't true.
Yes, but what do you HEAR?

Offline momule

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2178
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recording levels + post-processing
« Reply #20 on: March 22, 2007, 04:02:52 PM »
Im not sure what your monitoring with.  But alot of tapes I hear (including the Moe) are not all that close to being a good representation of how it may have sounded that night. IMO...
If I mixed a live show that sounded like that Im betting I wouldn't be asked to mix again.   

I think with all the cracked copies of Wavelab floating around out there if folks would just ask I know there is a few folks on this board who know how to use the plugins such as the Waves, Nomad, PSP and Timeworks plugins .  I'm not saying you can polish a turd but we could make um sound a bit more realistic. 

AKG 463's (uno ck62) > Mackie Onyx Satellite > Microtrack II

Offline Jammin72

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recording levels + post-processing
« Reply #21 on: March 25, 2007, 12:44:14 PM »
I was just commenting that engineering position can really be a weak spot in many touring bands.

I agree that there are some poor recordings out there but I think there are equally as many poorly mixed performances.
Yes, but what do you HEAR?

Offline rowjimmytour

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3776
  • Gender: Male
    • My LMA bookmarks
Re: Recording levels + post-processing
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2007, 10:45:21 PM »
Most of the time I record in a loud bar where most of the folks come to talk then to enjoy the music. Lately, after I got the busman2+ mod done I have been rollin' the dice and running hot. After a few shows I have come to the conclusion I like my red light flickering for all the loudest parts and peaking at -3dB but sometimes hitting 0dB. The loud landscape seems to make for a better recording when the band is loud but if its a soloist or acoustic act at the same bar I will peak a -6dB.
Peace
http://www.archive.org/bookmarNo
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe and saw

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF