Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: CDWave vs SF for transfers  (Read 5585 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline blu666z

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3277
  • AT ES943(H/C/O caps) » JKLab PP9 Pre » wmod UA-5
CDWave vs SF for transfers
« on: October 13, 2003, 08:37:14 PM »
Any opinions on either one?

-Kevin

Offline Joe w.

  • esniper
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5034
  • Gender: Male
  • Turn JB Up
Re:CDWave vs SF for transfers
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2003, 09:23:15 PM »
only 44.1 in cdwave. it is fine for that.

you almost have to have a wave editor for fades, sample rates and removing undesireable elements.
2016 National Champions
five generations with an unlocked door and a loaded burglar alarm

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re:CDWave vs SF for transfers
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2003, 09:23:44 PM »
If you're just transferring a 44.1 kHz DAT to HD, either should be fine.  I wouldn't resample or do any processing using CD-Wave, though.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline blu666z

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3277
  • AT ES943(H/C/O caps) » JKLab PP9 Pre » wmod UA-5
Re:CDWave vs SF for transfers
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2003, 09:29:50 PM »
Are there known flaws in doing 48 in cdwave?

-Kevin

cpclark

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:CDWave vs SF for transfers
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2003, 12:40:02 AM »
not sure about the 48, but you will have no problems at with soundforge, id be hesitant using cdwave to do anything other than splitting up already transfered wavs, as i am a diehard SF user and i think im gonna take the 99 dollar upgrade to sf7

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.047 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF