Taperssection.com

Gear / Technical Help => Post-Processing, Computer / Streaming / Internet Devices & Related Activity => Topic started by: plucks on June 11, 2008, 07:52:05 AM

Title: USB & eSATA Disk Array RAID
Post by: plucks on June 11, 2008, 07:52:05 AM
Is this external HD compatible with most any computer system?
http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=205770649
the Disk Array RAID label i am not familiar with.

or, would this be more appropriate?
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?sku=A1459415&cs=19&c=us&l=en&dgc=CJ&cid=24471&lid=566643


thanks!
Title: Re: USB & eSATA Disk Array RAID
Post by: Brian Skalinder on June 12, 2008, 01:09:07 AM
What's the intended usage of the HDD(s)?  Simply more storage space?  Real-time mirroring and redundancy (data is mirrored on the fly, all the time)?  Reasonable redundancy (data is mirrored once a day)?  Something else?  Do you plan to add these HDDs in addition to a disaster / recovery plan, like optical or magnetic media and / or offsite backup?
Title: Re: USB & eSATA Disk Array RAID
Post by: Brian Skalinder on June 12, 2008, 01:08:15 PM
Regarding RAID, a post I just made in a similar thread:

Personally, I think RAID is overkill for data that <a> doesn't change rapidly and <b> isn't mission-critical.  Additionally, IME most inexpensive RAID solutions use RAID controllers that I wouldn't trust any farther than I could throw them.  If I'm not going full enterprise-quality RAID, I'm not going RAID at all.  But that's me.  My solution:  reasonable redundancy without RAID (http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,65307.0.html).

Summary:

  • Multiple HDDs in an external case (firewire in my case, but eSATA will work just as well)
  • Mirrored nightly.  More info in the reasonable redundancy (http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=65307.msg876225#msg876225) thread.

Pros:

  • Inexpensive
  • Works great
  • Easy to set up
  • Very reliable
  • Doesn't rely on a cheapo / proprietary RAID controller
  • Easily recoverable in the case of HDD crash, etc.

Cons:

  • Doesn't have the cachet of an uber-geek RAID setup
  • Less usable HDD space v. RAID5 (though same as RAID1)