Taperssection.com

Gear / Technical Help => Post-Processing, Computer / Streaming / Internet Devices & Related Activity => Topic started by: spcyrfc on March 02, 2010, 06:14:57 PM

Title: protools level matching in post
Post by: spcyrfc on March 02, 2010, 06:14:57 PM
i have recently returned to protools and well, i thought it was gonna be like riding a bike, but it has yet to feel that way... this bike changes.

i have a simple question i should be able to answer myself, but after searching pt forums and screwing off in pt for awhile, i have no avail.

i imported a stereo track into PT, separated the stereo track into two mono tracks and cannot get the levels to match on the on screen meter.  i tried compressing one channel more than the other, but that doesn't make any sense to me.  tried boosting the volume of the lower track, and percieved an audible difference in my cans, but on the screen, the meters still didn't match.

is there a simple way to match meters exactly in post?

thnaks,

luke.
Title: Re: protools level matching in post
Post by: Əkoostikal on March 02, 2010, 07:55:04 PM
i have recently returned to protools and well, i thought it was gonna be like riding a bike, but it has yet to feel that way... this bike changes.

i have a simple question i should be able to answer myself, but after searching pt forums and screwing off in pt for awhile, i have no avail.

i imported a stereo track into PT, separated the stereo track into two mono tracks and cannot get the levels to match on the on screen meter.  i tried compressing one channel more than the other, but that doesn't make any sense to me.  tried boosting the volume of the lower track, and percieved an audible difference in my cans, but on the screen, the meters still didn't match.

is there a simple way to match meters exactly in post?

thnaks,

luke.


I am still learning a lot in PT and cannot answer you specifically, but you need to make sure that the "pre-fader monitoring" is not enabled to the meters.... That way you can see changes made to the mix in real time, which it sounds to me like that you are describing.
Title: Re: protools level matching in post
Post by: spcyrfc on March 03, 2010, 09:39:59 AM
thank you, also added gain to the individual tracks and processed.  got close.  i'll still look for a way to match tracks to eachother. 

suppose i have one more, more general question

what order do you work in?
compression > eq > ? 
or
eq > compression >
Title: Re: protools level matching in post
Post by: unclelouie on March 03, 2010, 07:24:53 PM
Since EQ'ing can have a big impact on dynamics (particularly in the low frequencies), you should EQ first, and then compress if necessary.

Title: Re: protools level matching in post
Post by: spcyrfc on March 03, 2010, 07:32:57 PM
and save! i just discovered... oh well. nothing much lost.