Taperssection.com

Gear / Technical Help => Recording Gear => Topic started by: Karma on March 01, 2011, 07:36:38 AM

Title: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 01, 2011, 07:36:38 AM
HI All,
I'm new here. It looks like a good forum. I found it when Googling for information on the Nagra BB+. I found very little. I noticed there seems to be a small Nagra contingent on this forum. So, I thought this would be a good place to post my question. On most other recording forums there is very little Nagra activity.

Since a search here came up with nothing for the BB+, I thought I would ask the Nagra guru's if they know anything about this machine (also the BB which is very similar). I have an opportunity to buy a demo machine at a decent price; not a great price but Nagra's never seem to be available at great prices. From the downloaded manual, the specs and features look attractive. And it's a Nagra which means a lot to me. I am an audiophile so my expectations of sound quality is high. I want a great sounding machine that is still portable enough for field use and at a price I can afford that is also a Nagra. That's a tough set of requirements.

I will be using it for a broad range of recording activities including field recording of natural sounds and music groups when I can. I plan on recording lots of trains and thunderstorms. Sorry, that's just one of my quirks.

This would be my first digital recorder. I have checked out all the lesser priced recorders and some seem good. But, they are not professional machines and that is a factor for me.

Also, I understand there is a free audio editor available but I have misplaced the name. Can you help with this?

Your thoughts will be appreciated.

Thanks, Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 01, 2011, 12:15:03 PM
The Nagra BB and BB+ are excellent little machines.

They were discontinued when the LB came out (the LB replacing the BB).

Info on the BB+ is HERE (http://www.nagraaudio.com/pro/pages/products_ares_bb+.php).

(http://www.nagraaudio.com/pro/images/Ares_BBplus_page.jpg)

It only had a 20-bit converter and sample frequencies only up to 48kHz - it would not do 24/96.

BUT - being a Nagra, the sound quality would have been better than most small 24/96 machines around at the time.

Depending on the price - I would check out the new SD machine they will show at NAB, and also the new Nagra VI quality pre-amp with integrated recorder (should be cheaper than the LB I understand) that they should also be showing at NAB.

From what you say you are going to do, I would strongly recommend you look at the new recorder.  This is the one with the Nagra VI quality mic. pre-amps. with built-in recorder.  I have been told they will be showing it at NAB next month and I hope it will be available in May.  I understand it will be cheaper than the LB, although the quality of the mic. pre-amps will be better (mainly because it will not have all the editing facilities that the LB has).  I already have my name down for one of these as it will increase my Nagra VI to 6 mic. inputs (all the same quality) and, with the built-in recorder option, will enable me to take it out on its own when I only need a small stereo machine (of the same quality, of course).  ;D

I hope this helps.


Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: it-goes-to-eleven on March 01, 2011, 12:37:36 PM
I find it very amusing, and rather sad, that Nagra has chosen to name their new recorder "SD" - short for Sound Devices.  There can be no doubt they thought about the potential for confusion, but decided to go with it.

They've surely lost a great deal of business to "SD" in recent years.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 01, 2011, 12:52:21 PM
I find it very amusing, and rather sad, that Nagra has chosen to name their new recorder "SD" - short for Sound Devices.  There can be no doubt they thought about the potential for confusion, but decided to go with it.

They've surely lost a great deal of business to "SD" in recent years.

I don't even think they thought about the Sound Devices connotation.

I honestly can't see any confusion at all - who will confuse "Nagra SD" with Sound Devices?

Actually Nagra and Sound Devices seem to have each carved out separate niches for each other and, in many ways, don't really compete with each other.  Once you have decided what you are doing, the choice is normally pretty clear.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 01, 2011, 06:09:40 PM
The Nagra BB and BB+ are excellent little machines.

They were discontinued when the LB came out (the LB replacing the BB).

Info on the BB+ is HERE (http://www.nagraaudio.com/pro/pages/products_ares_bb+.php).

(http://www.nagraaudio.com/pro/images/Ares_BBplus_page.jpg)

It only had a 20-bit converter and sample frequencies only up to 48kHz - it would not do 24/96.

BUT - being a Nagra, the sound quality would have been better than most small 24/96 machines around at the time.

Depending on the price - I would check out the new SD machine they will show at NAB, and also the new Nagra VI quality pre-amp with integrated recorder (should be cheaper than the LB I understand) that they should also be showing at NAB.

From what you say you are going to do, I would strongly recommend you look at the new recorder.  This is the one with the Nagra VI quality mic. pre-amps. with built-in recorder.  I have been told they will be showing it at NAB next month and I hope it will be available in May.  I understand it will be cheaper than the LB, although the quality of the mic. pre-amps will be better (mainly because it will not have all the editing facilities that the LB has).  I already have my name down for one of these as it will increase my Nagra VI to 6 mic. inputs (all the same quality) and, with the built-in recorder option, will enable me to take it out on its own when I only need a small stereo machine (of the same quality, of course).  ;D

I hope this helps.

HI John,
Well, it helps a little. Did you miss the part where I specified that I must be able to afford the machine? I looked at the LB and concluded that I could not justify the price for a hobby machine. I'm sure that any new Nagra will fall into the same catagory-too expensive. Taking that into consideration, does your suggestion change?

I must ask the following:

1. Have you actually heard recordings made on the BB+ on a really good hi fi system? What did you think?
2. Have you owned a BB+?
3. Have you made recordings on the BB+? IOW, have you actually used the machine?
4. In what way do you expect the new machine to be better?

I'm sorry to push the point but I am so tired of generalities that are thrown around on the internet. If you want to really help me, be specific. I need you to be specific. Spec sheets are not very inportant to me. Real world performance is very important. Information I received from a French compatriot concerning recordings made on the BB+ indicated the sound was excellent; some of the best he has heard. And he knows what is good. So do I.

Thanks, Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 01, 2011, 06:38:58 PM
The Nagra BB and BB+ are excellent little machines.

They were discontinued when the LB came out (the LB replacing the BB).

Info on the BB+ is HERE (http://www.nagraaudio.com/pro/pages/products_ares_bb+.php).

(http://www.nagraaudio.com/pro/images/Ares_BBplus_page.jpg)

It only had a 20-bit converter and sample frequencies only up to 48kHz - it would not do 24/96.

BUT - being a Nagra, the sound quality would have been better than most small 24/96 machines around at the time.

Depending on the price - I would check out the new SD machine they will show at NAB, and also the new Nagra VI quality pre-amp with integrated recorder (should be cheaper than the LB I understand) that they should also be showing at NAB.

From what you say you are going to do, I would strongly recommend you look at the new recorder.  This is the one with the Nagra VI quality mic. pre-amps. with built-in recorder.  I have been told they will be showing it at NAB next month and I hope it will be available in May.  I understand it will be cheaper than the LB, although the quality of the mic. pre-amps will be better (mainly because it will not have all the editing facilities that the LB has).  I already have my name down for one of these as it will increase my Nagra VI to 6 mic. inputs (all the same quality) and, with the built-in recorder option, will enable me to take it out on its own when I only need a small stereo machine (of the same quality, of course).  ;D

I hope this helps.

HI John,
Well, it helps a little. Did you miss the part where I specified that I must be able to afford the machine? I looked at the LB and concluded that I could not justify the price for a hobby machine. I'm sure that any new Nagra will fall into the same catagory-too expensive. Taking that into consideration, does your suggestion change?

I must ask the following:

1. Have you actually heard recordings made on the BB+ on a really good hi fi system? What did you think?
2. Have you owned a BB+?
3. Have you made recordings on the BB+? IOW, have you actually used the machine?
4. In what way do you expect the new machine to be better?

I'm sorry to push the point but I am so tired of generalities that are thrown around on the internet. If you want to really help me, be specific. I need you to be specific. Spec sheets are not very inportant to me. Real world performance is very important. Information I received from a French compatriot concerning recordings made on the BB+ indicated the sound was excellent; some of the best he has heard. And he knows what is good. So do I.

Thanks, Sparky

You said very clearly that there was not much discount off the BB - the LB was cheaper than the BB - the new recorder is better and cheaper than the LB (20 - 25% I think), so I considered that the new machine would come close what you would get the BB for.  A reasonable assumption I think.

No, I have not owned the BB - I looked at it closely and decided to pay the extra for the Nagra VI as I wanted a 24/96 recorder for location classical music recording.

I have also used the LB as a back-up machine and found it excellent (but that, too, is 24/96).

I posted the BB link because you said you could not find any information on it.

The new machine will be better because it uses the same top quality mic. pre-amps as the Nagra VI coupled with a 24/96 flash recorder.  The BB is an earlier machine with very good mic. pres (but not as good as the Nagra VI) and it's a 20/48 recorder, rather than a 24/96.

The BB was very good, the new one will be better and I think, from what you said, that the price would be comparable.

Oh - the free audio editing software is Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/).

Just trying to help...
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 01, 2011, 07:23:37 PM
HI John,
I'm guilty of the generalities I accused you of. I was reluctant to mention the price for fear of violating forum rules. But I will take the chance since it has become a discussion point. The price I was offered from Nagra USA is $1800 for the recorder, a PCMCIA flash card adaptor, a 1 gig Sandisk flash card, a strap, all software, the AA cell power pack and an AC mains wall wart. The unit is a demo example. This all adds up to a $3000 value or so I have been told. I've been assured that the machine is perfect.

A knowledgeable person at Nagra USA, who will remain unnamed to protect the innocent, made a very strong argument that the BB+ is a better machine than the LB. Yes, the sound quality as well as some features. What can I say? Who has the most experience with these machines?

Does this change anything from your point of view?

Thanks for the Audacity name. That's the one I was thinking of.

Thanks, Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: F.O.Bean on March 01, 2011, 07:28:36 PM
Thanks for the info John, very helpful. I am def considering the new Nagra w/ the flash recorder built in :)
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: andromedanwarmachine on March 02, 2011, 05:45:49 AM
well this is all fascinating!

I have never heard of the BB, let alone seen a picture of one! (and I do a daily search of the internet for 2nd hand Nagra gear)

Amazing to think that Nagra US would sell a unit ex-demo...

Hmmm. I think I'll keep saving for my LB- although it's a long road to climb- and you never see ANY second hand. I wonder how many users for the LB there are out there...? (still waiting for your SOS article, John!)

keep up the good work Karma- there aren't enough people recording thunderstorms!

JimP
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 02, 2011, 07:09:07 AM
HI John,
I'm guilty of the generalities I accused you of. I was reluctant to mention the price for fear of violating forum rules. But I will take the chance since it has become a discussion point. The price I was offered from Nagra USA is $1800 for the recorder, a PCMCIA flash card adaptor, a 1 gig Sandisk flash card, a strap, all software, the AA cell power pack and an AC mains wall wart. The unit is a demo example. This all adds up to a $3000 value or so I have been told. I've been assured that the machine is perfect.

A knowledgeable person at Nagra USA, who will remain unnamed to protect the innocent, made a very strong argument that the BB+ is a better machine than the LB. Yes, the sound quality as well as some features. What can I say? Who has the most experience with these machines?

Does this change anything from your point of view?

Thanks for the Audacity name. That's the one I was thinking of.

Thanks, Sparky

PM sent - I would say the new machine will be in the ball-park you want.

The comments from Nagra USA may be down to the fact there there were some issues with early versions of the LB - all corrected now.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: andromedanwarmachine on March 02, 2011, 07:55:14 AM
Hey John,

this is an interesting statement: "Once you have decided what you are doing, the choice is normally pretty clear."

what areas do you think play to the strengths of each machine...?

JimP
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 02, 2011, 09:27:37 AM
Hey John,

this is an interesting statement: "Once you have decided what you are doing, the choice is normally pretty clear."

what areas do you think play to the strengths of each machine...?

OK ............................

Really the differences between the 788T and the Nagra VI.

For pure audio quality I would say that the Nagra is the better (which is why it is being used by quite a few classical music location recordists), it can run for 12-15 hours on the high capacity battery pack and runs cool.  It is not heavy, but a bit large for over-the -shoulder stuff and probably better suited to a trolly or table-top use (which is how I use mine).

The 788T is about half the size, not quite as good audio-wise (but still better than just about anything else), but runs hot.  It is much better suited to over-the -shoulder stuff (but you need to leave air-space in the "handbag" - uniquely it will also take AES42 mics (I need the Neumann DMI-2P do do this with the Nagra).  The Nagra VI IMHO has the better ergonomics and the menu structure is certainly much better.

Both machines average out at about the same price, I think - The Nagra is cheaper in the UK and the SD is cheaper in the USA - so they are probably the same on average.  You get 8 mic. pre-amps with the SD and only 4 with the Nagra but at a higher spec. - the differences are not large, though.  The Menu structure is more awkward, though you can set short-cuts and the new iPhone app may get around a lot of this.

So, if you want the ultimate quality in music recording, the Nagra comes out top - if you are doing location recording for broadcast the SD comes out top.

Anyway, this is my take on it.

I like both machines.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: sunjan on March 03, 2011, 04:36:23 AM
I want a great sounding machine that is still portable enough for field use and at a price I can afford that is also a Nagra. That's a tough set of requirements.

I have checked out all the lesser priced recorders and some seem good. But, they are not professional machines...

I think you're being a bit harsh by concluding that all recorders you've found below $1800 are "not professional", and therefore inferior to the BB+.
I understand that street price for the BB+ is $2400, so you've been offered a good bargain:
http://www.pro-sound.com/R/SNAGARES.html

But since you're on a budget, I'd be interested to hear what mics you intend to run with the recorder? It would make little sense spending $1800 on the recorder if you put $500 mics in front of it.

You could easily find an SD 702 in the yard sale for less, not to mention other popular 24bit units here (DR-680, R-44, MR-1000, FR-2, PMD-661 with advanced mods for ambient recording).
That would give you more money to spend on mics, unless you already have stellar gear for all situations mentioned above (nature, trains, music, which all would benefit from different mics).
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: andromedanwarmachine on March 03, 2011, 07:03:40 AM
Thanks for that John...
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 03, 2011, 07:46:45 AM
I want a great sounding machine that is still portable enough for field use and at a price I can afford that is also a Nagra. That's a tough set of requirements.

I have checked out all the lesser priced recorders and some seem good. But, they are not professional machines...

I think you're being a bit harsh by concluding that all recorders you've found below $1800 are "not professional", and therefore inferior to the BB+.
I understand that street price for the BB+ is $2400, so you've been offered a good bargain:
http://www.pro-sound.com/R/SNAGARES.html

But since you're on a budget, I'd be interested to hear what mics you intend to run with the recorder? It would make little sense spending $1800 on the recorder if you put $500 mics in front of it.

You could easily find an SD 702 in the yard sale for less, not to mention other popular 24bit units here (DR-680, R-44, MR-1000, FR-2, PMD-661 with advanced mods for ambient recording).
That would give you more money to spend on mics, unless you already have stellar gear for all situations mentioned above (nature, trains, music, which all would benefit from different mics).

HI Sunjan,
You have a good point. Let's work with facts first. The BB+ in addition to the optional extras price out at $3000. So, the deal is better than you indicated. I can't claim that the sub $1800 machines are not as good or less professional than the BB+. But, the fact is that Nagra has been the pro's choice for decades. True, the competition is tougher in our digital age. But, I'll still go with the company that has the reputation. And I am a true lover of great, professional equipment. Test equipment is a good example. When I had my hi fi repair shop, I had all Tektronix test equipment. I tend to look at most other test equipment as junk. Most of it is junk. Working with Tektronix equipment is a joy in so many ways and makes my efforts better and more efficient. I still have all the equipment in my home shop. My cameras are all Nikon top of the line. Again, a joy. The term "professional" actually means something eventhough the term is used very loosly as a mark of merit. So, the only way to tell is look at what the pro's use. They very often use Nagra (and Nikon and Canon).

While I'm on a budget, I'm determined to not go cheap. Cosmic Law # 2: you get what you pay for.

My entry into this activity is a process and it can't happen overnight. There's too much to learn and too much experience to be gained and all this takes time.

Microphones are a tough call. I decided to not spend a fortune on great mic's at the beginning. I bought two AKG C 1000 mic's. I know these are not great mic's. They are good though. They will do as I go through the learning process. And I can afford them. As time goes on I plan to upgrade as necessary. It's a little like hi fi systems, with which I have over 50 years of experience. Most folks can't go out and buy their dream system if they even know what that is and usually they don't. Instead, they must grow into it, trading, buying used, experimenting until they finally learn what they want and can afford it. Mic's are like speakers. You can buy $10,000 speakers and have fine sound. But you can buy $50,000 systems and have great sound. Unless you are rich, you must take the steps in between to reach your goal. I am taking the gradual route. Obtaining a Nagra is a good first step.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: jlykos on March 03, 2011, 08:14:10 AM
I want a great sounding machine that is still portable enough for field use and at a price I can afford that is also a Nagra. That's a tough set of requirements.

I have checked out all the lesser priced recorders and some seem good. But, they are not professional machines...

I think you're being a bit harsh by concluding that all recorders you've found below $1800 are "not professional", and therefore inferior to the BB+.
I understand that street price for the BB+ is $2400, so you've been offered a good bargain:
http://www.pro-sound.com/R/SNAGARES.html

But since you're on a budget, I'd be interested to hear what mics you intend to run with the recorder? It would make little sense spending $1800 on the recorder if you put $500 mics in front of it.

You could easily find an SD 702 in the yard sale for less, not to mention other popular 24bit units here (DR-680, R-44, MR-1000, FR-2, PMD-661 with advanced mods for ambient recording).
That would give you more money to spend on mics, unless you already have stellar gear for all situations mentioned above (nature, trains, music, which all would benefit from different mics).

HI Sunjan,
You have a good point. Let's work with facts first. The BB+ in addition to the optional extras price out at $3000. So, the deal is better than you indicated. I can't claim that the sub $1800 machines are not as good or less professional than the BB+. But, the fact is that Nagra has been the pro's choice for decades. True, the competition is tougher in our digital age. But, I'll still go with the company that has the reputation. And I am a true lover of great, professional equipment. Test equipment is a good example. When I had my hi fi repair shop, I had all Tektronix test equipment. I tend to look at most other test equipment as junk. Most of it is junk. Working with Tektronix equipment is a joy in so many ways and makes my efforts better and more efficient. I still have all the equipment in my home shop. My cameras are all Nikon top of the line. Again, a joy. The term "professional" actually means something eventhough the term is used very loosly as a mark of merit. So, the only way to tell is look at what the pro's use. They very often use Nagra (and Nikon and Canon).

While I'm on a budget, I'm determined to not go cheap. Cosmic Law # 2: you get what you pay for.

My entry into this activity is a process and it can't happen overnight. There's too much to learn and too much experience to be gained and all this takes time.

Microphones are a tough call. I decided to not spend a fortune on great mic's at the beginning. I bought two AKG C 1000 mic's. I know these are not great mic's. They are good though. They will do as I go through the learning process. And I can afford them. As time goes on I plan to upgrade as necessary. It's a little like hi fi systems, with which I have over 50 years of experience. Most folks can't go out and buy their dream system if they even know what that is and usually they don't. Instead, they must grow into it, trading, buying used, experimenting until they finally learn what they want and can afford it. Mic's are like speakers. You can buy $10,000 speakers and have fine sound. But you can buy $50,000 systems and have great sound. Unless you are rich, you must take the steps in between to reach your goal. I am taking the gradual route. Obtaining a Nagra is a good first step.

Sparky

Sorry, but I think that your plan is a little bit backwards.  Microphones make a *much* more significant change in sound quality of a recording than does the recorder, preamplifier, or A/D converter.  I would put my money in the microphones first and then get a good recorder than the other way around.  I realize that you want "the best," but AKG C1000 microphones are not that, nor are they even in "the good" category IMO.  True, you may be getting a good deal on the recorder, but you will be able to make much higher quality recordings if you allocated your funds to spend $1800 on the microphones and $300 on the recorder instead of the other way around.  Even if you spent $300 on the recorder right now, you could get something like a Sony M10 and then sell it later for like $250, which would be a whole $50 depreciation on your $2100 investment.  For $1800, you could get good enough microphones where you would never need to purchase another set.  Besides, recording technology moves really fast; cheaper recorders are usually the way to go so you don't plow $2000 into an "all in one" unit that will become obsolete when 32 bit, 384 khz comes around or whatever the hell we will listen to in the future.  The mics will still be there, however.

But, hey, it's your money.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: TNJazz on March 03, 2011, 09:56:29 AM
I bought two AKG C 1000 mic's. I know these are not great mic's. They are good though.

No offense, but no they are most definitely NOT good.  I'd use them in a pinch, but only if I needed to put a nail in a wall and couldn't find my hammer.

While I'm on a budget, I'm determined to not go cheap. Cosmic Law # 2: you get what you pay for.

Yes, and you will most certainly pay for your choice of microphones in this case.  This may be a little strong and it's strictly my opinion, but personally I'm hard pressed to come up with a worse microphone that has EVER been produced.  I would revisit the suggestions above from sunjan and jlykos to put more money into microphones and not worry about the recorder as much.  Your ears will thank you in the end.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: it-goes-to-eleven on March 03, 2011, 10:07:17 AM
We all have our preferences...

Recorder technology is still rapidly improving, while getting less expensive.

The same cannot be said for great mics.  Over the long term, they hold their value, or even increase.  There are some very good imported products coming to market.  I don't hear anyone holding them up to great mics, and I question their resale down the road, and the ability to get service in 10 or 20 years.

In terms of getting a great result *today*, I'd contend you'd be so much further along spending $2K on mics and $1k on your pre-amp and recorder.   With the Nagra and those AKGs, I think you would get good or very good results at best.

As for the AKG cards, a lot of folks seem to like the AT 3032 omnis.   I suspect they would produce better nature recordings.  They are quite affordable if you can find them - they are discontinued.

Of course, I tend to believe form follows function.  No recorder, no matter how "professional", can make up for what is lost with inferior mics.

Are you "covered" in terms of wind control?
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: page on March 03, 2011, 10:34:31 AM
As for the AKG cards, a lot of folks seem to like the AT 3032 omnis.   I suspect they would produce better nature recordings.  They are quite affordable if you can find them - they are discontinued.

Of course, I tend to believe form follows function.  No recorder, no matter how "professional", can make up for what is lost with inferior mics.

yeah, it's a sweet deal, but if you have X amount of cash, I'd get a set of nice DPAs and then spend a little coin on a preamp and cheap recorder than get the nagra and the C1000s.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 03, 2011, 12:11:02 PM
HI All,
Wow, you guy's are ripping me hard. Your opinions of the AKG mics are not universal at all. I researched the issue as best I could and found many folks who really like the C1000's. Why else would I have bought them? And who are you? Is your opinion better than those who like the mic? And, for that matter, who are they? In truth, you are offering opinions that I did not ask for. I will find out for myself. It's the only way.

If I were to ask a hundred people which is their favorite mic, I would get 100 different answers. Further, many would criticize other folks for their choices. So who has the best answers? I don't know and there is no way of finding out short of using the mics and making my judgment.

These mics are not show stoppers. If I don't like them, I can sell them at not a great loss.

And I think your views on the recorders are misguided. Consider the pre-amps in any machine. Are they important? You bet they are. Do you think that great pre-amps come cheap? They don't. Do you think they are less important than the mics? I don't think so. They are both important. So, I say, buy good pre-amps. I'm going to do that.

And I'm willing to bet that most of you have never even seen a Nagra must less used one. Even more restrictive, used the same one I'm considering. Thus, I must discount your views. You are guessing based upon no personal information. This happens too much on the internet.

In the world of hi fi I have found that amplification is just as important as great speakers. In fact they must work together to produce great sound. It's called symbiosis. The same is true with mics and pre-amps. These mics are not the final word. They are just to get started. I notice that none of you have mentioned the really expensive mics. What do you think you would get if you spent $1500 on a mic? Something better? Are you willing to spend that much? I'll bet not. Why, because you don't place a great value on the fine quality sound which the great mics are capable of. But I am willing to spend that much. Just not now. I'm not ready for that level of quality.

So, get off your high horse's. I know my style and I don't expect you to agree. But you could at least try to see my view.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: TNJazz on March 03, 2011, 12:37:54 PM
In the world of hi fi I have found that amplification is just as important as great speakers. In fact they must work together to produce great sound. It's called symbiosis. The same is true with mics and pre-amps.

True.  Your combo of C1000s>Nagra is kind of like getting a high end amp and running it to some "white van" speakers though.  No one's saying "don't buy the Nagra" because your view of preamps being important is correct.  The thing is, it's all about "garbage in, garbage out".  The microphones you use will make a much more significant difference in your end result.

What do you think you would get if you spent $1500 on a mic?

I know what I get from my main mics, and trust me I know what comes out of an AKG C1000 too.  The two are so far apart that there's no way the recorder and preamp could even begin to make a difference.  You are approaching this the wrong way and this forum is full of people who know that and are trying to help you so that you don't look back on a wasted investment (and no we are obviously not talking about the Nagra).

So, get off your high horse's. I know my style and I don't expect you to agree. But you could at least try to see my view.

Seriously?
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Javier Cinakowski on March 03, 2011, 12:47:42 PM
Karma, did you come here to get an opinion, or did you come here to have your opinion re-enforced, it sounds like the later to me.

my $0.02 sounds a lot like the others:
I agree that C1000's aren't very good sounding mics at any price point.  I also agree that the mics are FAR more important than the preamp.  You can find a used modded PMD660 or fr2le for less than $300 that will hold its own against much more expensive recorders.  The mics are the biggest difference.  The mics are a mechanical device that vary greatly amongst manufacture and model.  Preamps are not nearly as critical.  A preamp with decent specs will perform like another preamp with decent specs. 
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 03, 2011, 01:04:54 PM
HI javier,
I never asked for an opinion about the mics. This thread was started to find out about Nagra's. Reference the thread title. However, as much as you are ripping me it won't do any good. I will follow my own path and you will follow yours. Experience is the only teacher that counts.

But, as a point of interest, would you guy's like to exactly tell me what is wrong with the C1000's. You've done nothing more than generalize. Give me some real descriptions of the sonic differences.

And, BTW, I do realize the difference between bad, good, and great. Mostly, it can be determined by price and then stylistic differences within a price range. While I may be a beginner at this type of recording, I have great tape recorders for 40 years and have done a large amount of recording. Does this experience apply here. Yes, I think so. But not entirely because of the constant change to the technology.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: newplanet7 on March 03, 2011, 01:09:41 PM
Look, no one is ripping on you. They are giving you advice on the choice of mic pairing with your recorder of choice.
The mics are the first to report the sound, and shouldn't be the weakest link by any means.
In your set-up they are the weakest link. Why pair something bottom shelf with something top shelf?

No one is saying the pre-amps aren't important so I'm not sure where you're getting that.
You say no one here has used this nagra box and that is a valid point, however neither have you.
A lot of us are  familiar with the c1000's however, and know that what you will be taking in with those mics isn't going
to be up to YOUR PROFESSIONAL STANDARD and it's rather pointless to pair the two.
REMEBER THIS????:
I am an audiophile so my expectations of sound quality is high.
But, they are not professional machines and that is a factor for me.

This is what we are responding to.
You are trying to polish a turd.


While I'm on a budget, I'm determined to not go cheap. Cosmic Law # 2: you get what you pay for.
Are you starting to understand why people are giving you advice?? you keep contradicting yourself.
We've used the mics, you haven't.

LASTLY
Your thoughts will be appreciated.
Thanks, Sparky
Really?
People are bringing up the mics because of everything you claim to want as far as great sound and professional quality.










Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: OFOTD on March 03, 2011, 01:19:51 PM
No one here is trying to rip on you Sparky.   We're trying to pass along experiences and information that has been tested, comp'd and learned in the field for decades.   So to try and help......

The Nagra > C1000 combo is like buying a Ferrari and putting in a Yugo motor.

If you're ready, willing and able to make the jump to a Nagra then by all means pair it with something that will help you realize the investment.  If someone on some other forum told you that C1000's were a good match (sonically and price-wise) to any Nagra then they were lying to you.

In an earlier post you stated

While I'm on a budget, I'm determined to not go cheap. Cosmic Law # 2: you get what you pay for.

Cosmic Law #2 doesn't apply here.  You'll buy a great sounding recorder and a pair of cheap Chinese mics and you'll get nowhere near the quality for the price.    Want to buy some mics that will help you realize the potential of your recorder investment? Look at what others who run higher end recorders use.  DPA, Schoeps, etc.   All microphones that are universally praised and used by professionals.   

It appears that you've done some research and have been able to pick out the Nagra as a recorder that interests you.  Take some time here on this site and read what others run and why.   You'll quickly learn that one of the guiding principals here is that your rig is only as good as where you start from.   Mics are the starting point, not preamps, a/d's or recorders.   Someone has steered you backwards. 

We're just trying to help get you on the right track.

Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: page on March 03, 2011, 01:27:16 PM
But, as a point of interest, would you guy's like to exactly tell me what is wrong with the C1000's. You've done nothing more than generalize. Give me some real descriptions of the sonic differences.

They are not very detailed in my experience, and have a veil over what sound they do pass. I got this squelch effect (a hyping of the 300hz area and around 1khz with little in the middle). I've heard recordings of these mics paired with high end machines (SD 7 series) and it reminds me of a good iphone/landline phone call, not of a believable soundstage for nature recordings. (as noted in your objective here:)

I will be using it for a broad range of recording activities including field recording of natural sounds and music groups when I can. I plan on recording lots of trains and thunderstorms.

So, you can use them, they will pass a signal, but bang for buck I find even the AKG 460/480 lines better if you are interested in AKGs. Hell, I think the AKG blueline series produces a more realistic sound across the frequency spectrum than the C1000s. The reason I find this important is because it helps create a realistic soundstage and second, you're doing ambient/nature recordings where a sense of realism and detail is important (hence my recomendation of DPAs because your original post seemed to stress quality).

No one here is trying to rip on you Sparky.   We're trying to pass along experiences and information that has been tested, comp'd and learned in the field for decades.   So to try and help......

The Nagra > C1000 combo is like buying a Ferrari and putting in a Yugo motor.

If you're ready, willing and able to make the jump to a Nagra then by all means pair it with something that will help you realize the investment.  If someone on some other forum told you that C1000's were a good match (sonically and price-wise) to any Nagra then they were lying to you.

I agree with all of this, specifically the yugo analogy.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: it-goes-to-eleven on March 03, 2011, 01:50:46 PM
I notice that none of you have mentioned the really expensive mics. What do you think you would get if you spent $1500 on a mic? Something better? Are you willing to spend that much? I'll bet not. Why, because you don't place a great value on the fine quality sound which the great mics are capable of.

We didn't mention our mics because it would have been pointless bragging.  I own Schoeps, Gefells and DPAs.  You don't have to buy those mics, and you don't need to spend $1500.  If we took the people who have posted in this thread, and added up what they have spent on mics, it'd be a scary big number.  Probably six figures.

So coming here with limited experience, and then throwing insults by suggesting *we* are the ones who don't know anything about "fine quality sound"...  Comical.   But thanks for the laugh! :P
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Javier Cinakowski on March 03, 2011, 02:00:47 PM
I don't think he needs to spend $1000's on mics either.  Hell, the $150/pair Karma K10's will sound better(more accurate and lifelike) than the C1000's.  The name is appropriate too :-)

Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 03, 2011, 02:30:20 PM
Wow, you guy's are ripping me hard. Your opinions of the AKG mics are not universal at all. I researched the issue as best I could and found many folks who really like the C1000's. Why else would I have bought them?

Sorry Sparky,

The AKG C1000 is probably one of the very few mics that I have only ever read bad things about, I don't think I have ever heard anyone saying good things about them, sorry.

Normally, with a Nagra you would use something like: Sennheiser MKH series, Neumann, Schoeps, DPA, Gefell or MBHO (MBHO being especially good value for the quality - similar quality to Schoeps but a lot cheaper).

If you want good quality on a tight budget - then something like a stereo pair of Rode NT55, or NT5 (the omni heads of the NT55 are also available on their own and fit the NT5 so you can have both cardioid and omni).

As far as I am aware, the C1000 was designed by AKG to be an on-stage musicians mic., rather than a recording mic.

I can understand wanting something like a Nagra and using inexpensive mics. while he saves up for something decent to match the Nagra (and, in a way, I did something like this myself when I started many years ago).  But I think you will be very disappointed with the C1000 - sorry.

Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: kirk97132 on March 03, 2011, 04:03:12 PM
I got a BRAND new pair of AKG C391 B that I'll give you a good deal on.  Better than the C-1ooos by far and would allow you to change out capsules later.  Much more flexible with varying situations and would not break the bank.   Not to jump on the band wagon but I have yet to meet anyone who likes the c-1000s after critical listening, maybe for voice only but even then they just basically suck.   I think it was AKG's attempt to have a mic that could be battery powered
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: sunjan on March 03, 2011, 05:35:09 PM
OK, let's go back to your objectives:

Your objective is to get the best versatile rig for your money, that can record both thunderstorms, trains and live music.
You have $1800 or so to spend at the moment. Do you see yourself spending any more on mics in the near future?
In that case, by all means go ahead and grab the Nagra. You already made up your mind that it's the best spent $1800 on the market.

But if you don't see yourself saving up more cash for mics later on, you need to rethink your gear chain.

The question here is not whether the Nagra is a great recorder or not. I'm sure it is.
The question is: are you willing to tape thunderstorms, trains and live music with your C1000's and end up with sub-par recordings until that day when you've saved up enough money to upgrade to professional grade mics?

I'd say that in this thread alone, the users who responded have about 150-200 years of collective taper experience. Some of the guys here are even university professors on recording and acoustics. Others are microphone retailers like Purple Dog, and have access to the full range of mics from all brands that they represent. Many of us have downloaded hundreds, even thousands of shows on archive.org, comparing mics, pres and recorders. To say that we don't have enough "personal information" to offer you our views on how to achieve your objectives is just plain unfounded.

I researched the issue as best I could and found many folks who really like the C1000's. Why else would I have bought them?
The reason why many users end up buying C1000 and similar low-end mics is that they only have $200 to spend. Perhaps also because they didn't have the same very specific usage in mind that you do. As others mentioned, they are designed to be on-stage mics, making them much less suitable for long-distance recording and ambient stuff.
And maybe because AKG are better at marketing and has a global retail outreach aiming at the hobbyist mass market, while more specialized mic manufacturers (think Schoeps, Gefell, MBHO, Milab, Nevaton) don't?!  ;D

In truth, you are offering opinions that I did not ask for. I will find out for myself. It's the only way.

Definitely, let your ears decide. Go to archive.org, download some shows with multiple sources and compare a C1000 recording with $1500 mic recordings of the same show. Come back here, upload them and let's have a blind A/B listening test.

If I were to ask a hundred people which is their favorite mic, I would get 100 different answers.

That's because your hypothetical question is too open. If you rephrased it to "which is your favourite mic setup that can record both trains, thunder and music, and my budget is around $1000-1500?", concensus here would probaly narrow down your choice to maybe 5-10 models + caps.

So who has the best answers? I don't know and there is no way of finding out short of using the mics and making my judgment.

It's up to you if you bother to do the research in advance or not. Users here do this research, all the time. Again, let your ears decide. There are lot's of sources on archive and other sites where you can compare mics. You don't have to buy and use your own gear to make judgments.

Do you think they are less important than the mics? I don't think so. They are both important. So, I say, buy good pre-amps. I'm going to do that.

Nobody is arguing against you buying gear with good preamps. This is not what the discussion is about. What we're all trying to say is that the best preamps in the world won't output a good recording if you feed them with mics that aren't suitable for the task.

What do you think you would get if you spent $1500 on a mic? Something better? Are you willing to spend that much? I'll bet not. Why, because you don't place a great value on the fine quality sound which the great mics are capable of. But I am willing to spend that much. Just not now. I'm not ready for that level of quality.

You're contradicting yourself here.
IIUC, you're willing to accept less-than-great sound quality on your recordings and stick to your C1000's for the time being, but at the same time won't consider sub-$1800 recorders because they're not professional enough. Why? Wasn't your objective to get the best overall quality given your current budget?
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 03, 2011, 06:49:57 PM
HI sun,
I never deceived myself. I knew the C1000 were not the best mics. Price is a good guide. However, I did the research and found many who thought the C1000 was a good mic. That's one reason I bought it. The other reason is the lack selection locally. There is no way I could audition the vast quantity of mics out in the market. Also, I knew no one who could help. I don't see that I had much choice but to buy mics that got good comments, I could afford, were available and had the features I wanted (battery power, 48V phantom operable, and variable pattern). Honestly, I never expected this outpouring of venom aimed at the C1000. I thought I was doing OK within the confines of my objectives. I will use my ears and I don't need you to remind me. I live in the world of high end hi fi. My ears are all I've got.

And yes, I am willing to have lower quality recordings as I learn the craft. That's the price of of the experience. I understood that from the beginning. Also yes, I always planned to buy better mics as my skills justified the cost.

I truly think you guy's are not putting yourself in my shoes. I would appreciate it if you would try. You don't have to agree with me but I don't like to be treated like an idiot.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: F.O.Bean on March 03, 2011, 09:12:34 PM
Wow, you guy's are ripping me hard. Your opinions of the AKG mics are not universal at all. I researched the issue as best I could and found many folks who really like the C1000's. Why else would I have bought them?

Normally, with a Nagra you would use something like: Sennheiser MKH series, Neumann, Schoeps, DPA, Gefell or MBHO (MBHO being especially good value for the quality - similar quality to Schoeps but a lot cheaper).

I can understand wanting something like a Nagra and using inexpensive mics. while he saves up for something decent to match the Nagra (and, in a way, I did something like this myself when I started many years ago).  But I think you will be very disappointed with the C1000 - sorry.


I totally agree w/ John! MBHO's are AMAZING for their price, at least IMO, and they have different capsules so you can add them as time goes by :)

And noone is ripping you, just trying to be truthful and to guide you in the "right" direction :)
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: page on March 04, 2011, 12:45:12 AM
HI sun,
I never deceived myself. I knew the C1000 were not the best mics. Price is a good guide. However, I did the research and found many who thought the C1000 was a good mic. That's one reason I bought it. The other reason is the lack selection locally. There is no way I could audition the vast quantity of mics out in the market. Also, I knew no one who could help. I don't see that I had much choice but to buy mics that got good comments, I could afford, were available and had the features I wanted (battery power, 48V phantom operable, and variable pattern). Honestly, I never expected this outpouring of venom aimed at the C1000. I thought I was doing OK within the confines of my objectives. I will use my ears and I don't need you to remind me. I live in the world of high end hi fi. My ears are all I've got.

And yes, I am willing to have lower quality recordings as I learn the craft. That's the price of of the experience. I understood that from the beginning. Also yes, I always planned to buy better mics as my skills justified the cost.

I truly think you guy's are not putting yourself in my shoes. I would appreciate it if you would try. You don't have to agree with me but I don't like to be treated like an idiot.

I've been where you are now; I didn't have the opportunity to sample gear before purchase. I had to make decisions with limited information. I had to make some bum recordings before I got better. You are correct, there is a learning curve and it is the price of experience. However, that curve can be diminished and the price lowered. So yes, I have been in your shoes, and I have tried (as others here have) to help reduce that learning curve. You are right, you didn't come here to ask about mics, we offered responses based on your stated goals to try and help you. On that note, I think Javier is right, based on your actions and responses, this wasn't an information seeking inquiry, but one of confirmation.

Some have been more testy in their replies than others, true, but we all have a collective wealth of experience which can make this adventure less painful or disenfranchising for you. Nobody here wants to see you fail in your objective as evidenced by our willingness to take the time to think out a response that will provide you with useful information pertaining to your professed goals. So I'd appreciate it if you didn't treat us like idiots, because we all started somewhere and we remember what that was like, and now we have something to offer in this realm of knowledge that can help you. I have tried my best not to rip on you for your replies, and will instead offer one last piece of advice that you can take or leave as you wish; If I were you, and my money was limited and I had a desire to produce high quality recordings of nature/ambient sounds while I learned. I'd get a cheap recorder and use your C1000s for a number of recordings. Learn what patterns can do for sound, learn what other recorders are out there, features, etc. Learn what other mics are out there, and what features you actually need and which ones don't prove nearly as useful as you first thought (I've had several of those epiphanies myself. Something looked great on paper only to be rather useless or lackluster once I got in the field). Then, I'd buy new mics before getting a new/better recorder, because as others have noted; the quality of your mics will make the biggest difference in your recording compared to anything else in the signal chain. To put it more bluntly, a good set of mics and a bad recorder will trump a bad set of mics and a good recorder 4 out of 5 times if not more. Maybe money isn't tight for you, I don't know (that wasn't stated in any of the posts I saw earlier), but if money is tight, I'd start out with cheap gear until you feel comfortable and concentrate on upgrading the mics. In that regard, the C1000s will be a good learning tool. They did not cost as much as other mics, and they will let you learn, but I suggest saving some cash and getting a cheaper recorder to learn on and saving some money for mics down the road. Take it or leave it.

If you don't think our information or opinion is up to snuff, maybe we are crazy or whatever. In that case, I suggest asking at other recording forums, such as gearslutz.com and see what another side of the recording craft says, maybe we'll have the same opinion, maybe not. (GS is frequented by lots of paid professionals who churn out CDs professionally from classical, rock, to nature recordings, where as we are generally non-professionals/hobbyist who have gotten fairly good at what we do. They do this as a living and have an astonishing knowledge base to draw upon, they know their gear in and out.)

Regardless, good luck.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: F.O.Bean on March 04, 2011, 01:28:32 AM
I started out like Page, back in the mid 90's, when cassettes were traded, and I was sick of getting 9th generation cassettes, so I bought my "OWN" HQ rig[AKG 481>DMIC-20>Sony D8], and swore Id never listen to another shitty cassette tape. Places like archive.org were not around, nor was ts.com, so you had to rely on word of mouth and listening to a few recordings you liked, and picked your mics from that. I had to rely on my recordings getting better from EXPERIENCE, not from many helpful people on a website. I would have been in HEAVEN if ts.com was around. Noone told me to run DIN/DINa/NOS/ORTF/etc, I ran those after trying out show after show and listening critically to those results :)

So I say, get a good pair of mics, and a modded 24-bit "all-in-one" recorder w/ alot of gain for ambient recordings, and you will thank us later. If you like those mics and have more $$, then start to save up for the Nagra. Getting an expensive recorder and shitty mics is doing it backwards, as others have stated. Start w/ mics, then preamp, then ADC/Recorder. Trust us on this ;)

Good luck in your search and journey. And I hope you like it, because its VERY ADDICTIVE. I hope you end up liking it and sticking around ts.com :)
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: sunjan on March 04, 2011, 05:10:37 AM
Honestly, I never expected this outpouring of venom aimed at the C1000.
Look, I don't think that C1000 is a bad mic per se. For someone with a mic budget of $300-400 who only intend to use them for close miking (as opposed to ambient field recording), they are perfectly OK. I have even recommended them as starter mics here on TS earlier, to guys who couldn't afford spending more.
We're not saying that you made a bad investment. The resale value is excellent, you did nothing wrong given your circumstances.

But you yourself mentioned the law of diminishing returns. If I'd put myself in your shoes, I'd look at it this way:

John Doe has $400 worth of mics, $0 worth of recorder and $1800 to spend at the moment.
The difference between $400 mics and say $1300 worth of mics is pretty substantial. Also because it allows you to get multiple caps, or even a separate handheld stereo mic for nature/field use, instead of juggling two separate mics. Whereas the difference between a $900 and $1800 recorder is much smaller.

And yes, I am willing to have lower quality recordings as I learn the craft. That's the price of of the experience. I understood that from the beginning. Also yes, I always planned to buy better mics as my skills justified the cost.

Why don't you apply this reasoning when shopping for a recorder then? You acknowledge that you are a learner in certain aspects, and that you will settle for low-budget mics until your skills are better. Like page suggested, get a recorder that is on par with the mics, sound- and budget wise, and save the bulk of your budget until your skills justify the cost?!

If you feel that us folks at TS are biased, go to gearslutz or even better, Nature Recordists:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

Post the same scenario there. Evaluate the advice given from all three communities and see if the opinions converge. Good luck with your endeavours...

As a service, feel free to compare these tapes. It's three gigs, with dual sources (C1000's vs other mics):

AKG C1000's>UA5>NJB3
http://www.archive.org/details/eh2007-08-18
AKG 481 > Silver Dogstar > ACM R4
http://www.archive.org/details/eh2007-08-18.eh2007-08-18.aud.flac16
sp lsd2(x-y cards, bass rolloff, 6.5', fob, 5' loc)>acm 660(-20db)
http://www.archive.org/details/eh2007-08-18.aud.shn.proper

FOB DPA 4023(ORTF) > Lunatec V3 > Sony D-8 @ 16/48
http://www.archive.org/details/sci2004-06-11.dpa4023
AKG C1000's (ORTF, DFC 35' from stage) > Samson Mixpad 4 > TCD-D8
http://www.archive.org/details/sci2004-06-11.shnf

CEMC6-CK4>FR2-LE
http://www.archive.org/details/dbt2010-02-12
AKG C1000S> Edirol R-09> USB> Sound Forge> CDWav
http://www.archive.org/details/dbt2010-02-13
(two consecutive dates, but you get the point...)
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: ghellquist on March 04, 2011, 06:58:07 AM
I believe the lure here is the seemingly large discount. 1200 bucks off cannot be wrong. Or can it?

My guess is that it is. It is still a lot of money. For old technology, this used to be state of the art but is mostly standard today. Can the same money be used wiser? My suggestion as well as most others is to sell those noisy C1000 mics, there are much better alternatives for ambience recordings if you look at the total budget.

It is like putting 50k buck speakers in a concrete bunker without doing any sound treatment of the room. Spending half as much gets you better sound if it includes acoustic treatment. Less status though, agrred.

Gunnar
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 04, 2011, 09:46:25 AM
HI Guy's,
The last few posts at least made an attempt to see my position and I appreciate it. I know you don't agree with me and am not going to push the point. I apologize for being a bit distressed at your sometimes harsh words. You are right. I do see care for a fellow recordist. That's nice and makes me feel more at home. Thanks.

As I see it, in the final analysis it makes no difference relative to my final goal whether I buy a Nagra or better mics first. I must go with my instincts which are very much are aimed at a professional level recorder. I will go in the Nagra direction knowing ultimately it is a right decision. This is not at all a matter of whether or not I will get to my goals. I will. I'm a very focused person. What I mostly need is a functional kit that gets me into the field and start recording - the fun part. Experience is everything which I will get no matter what equipment I buy or which order I purchase it. My love for fine equipment will just make the journey more enjoyable to me. I do think that is important.

Let me pose a hypothetical question to you. Let's say I had a mic budget of up to $2000 for two matched mics. This is not an unrealistic budget. I just bought a $3500 Lyra Skala phono cartridge for my main hi fi system. Some people think I am crazy for doing this. But, the phono cartridge is very much like a mic. The sound starts there; it's the source. Some in this thread seem to think I don't understand that concept. Not true. I'm totally in agreement with it. I'm capable and willing to spend real money when I think it is important.

Given my goals that have been stated many times in this thread, which mics would you suggest for $2000? I'd love to hear you views because at some point in the future I will need your advice and I will use it. Understand that I probably will have no chance to audition the mics you suggest. I hate being in that position but there is not much I can do about it. Also, I understand that no single mic is universal. I fully expect to eventually have a stable of mics for different purposes. But, let’s start at the start; a great general purpose mic.

Please, have fun with this. What would you buy?

Thanks, Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: page on March 04, 2011, 11:00:00 AM
Given my goals that have been stated many times in this thread, which mics would to suggest for $2000? I'd love to hear you views because at some point in the future I will need your advice and I will use it. Understand that I probably will have no chance to audition the mics you suggest. I hate being in that position but there is not much I can do about it. Also, I understand that no single mic is universal. I fully expect to eventually have a stable of mics for different purposes. But, let’s start at the start; a great general purpose mic.

Please, have fun with this. What would you buy?

Thanks, Sparky

If the top end of the first jump is 2k, and the usage is still for nature recording, I'd consider a couple of options:

Schoeps MK series (the MK21, MK2, and maybe the MK4 in particular) combined with either what we call an nbox or a CMR setup (two different options, both eliminate the need for the CMC bodies which is an added expense). A set of caps are aproximately $1500 (new) total, with the rest to spend on the amplifier to power them. Bodies wouldn't be required for this particular setup. The advantage here is while for nature recording the CMR takes a sensitivity hit, you could probably resell it later when you move up to the nbox (unless you can find one used at a good price), so in my view it's not a waste of an investment since you get the keep the most expensive part (the caps). If you are not careful, the schoeps will run more then $2k, easily. The only viability I can think of that keeps it under $2k is the CMR setup and maybe an nbox setup if you can find the caps used.

A set of Microtech Gefell M2000/m20 mics might fit under $2k if you really hunt around, but I'd expect to pay around $2400. While colored in their sound signature, they are held in high regard for their detail. MBHO's Omni &/or Subcards would fit under $2k, as would the beyerdynamic full body MC910/930 (each, not sure together). A set of AKG 480 bodies and ck61 or ck62 (omni) caps should fit within $2k. All of these would work, and produce a better result than lower end stuff, but they aren't the best for nature recording IMHO. They do pretty well at concert or musical event recording and their color generally adds to the recording, but it's a different value system in place for nature/sfx stuff.

Might consider investigating Milab, specifically the VM-44 omni/cardioid system. I don't know enough about it to pass judgement in the realm of nature/sfx.

DPAs only fit under $2k if you get the lower end stuff or beat someone up in an alley and run really fast.  :P I can think of some folks who hold the 406x line in regard for their low end omni stuff if you take the grill off. ymmv and I'd want to hear samples before I committed my money in that direction. Ultimately, if money was no object, I'd pick up the DPA reference series omnis, subcardioids and cardioids. I'm not as fond of their signature for music, but for nature and ambient sounds, I think their signature of detail and lack of sonic color are real benefits.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 04, 2011, 11:56:19 AM
HI Page,
Thanks for your input. Please remember that one of my original goals was recording music. Probably this means solo or small group performers. But if I can manage it I want to record chamber groups, bands, and symphony orchestras. I plan to do this as much as I can but it will take time to build contacts. Nature is only one of my objectives.

Also, it would help if you all indicate if you have actually used the mics you suggest.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 04, 2011, 12:03:24 PM
HI Page,
Thanks for your input. Please remember that one of my original goals was recording music. Probably this means solo or small group performers. But if I can manage it I want to record chamber groups, bands, and symphony orchestras. I plan to do this as much as I can but it will take time to build contacts. Nature is only one of my objectives.

Also, it would help if you all indicate if you have actually used the mics or have first hand experience with what you suggest.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: page on March 04, 2011, 12:15:39 PM
HI Page,
Thanks for your input. Please remember that one of my original goals was recording music. Probably this means solo or small group performers. But if I can manage it I want to record chamber groups, bands, and symphony orchestras. I plan to do this as much as I can but it will take time to build contacts. Nature is only one of my objectives.

Also, it would help if you all indicate if you have actually used the mics you suggest.

Sparky

I've personally used/own the beyerdynamic ones so I'm rather familiar with the detail and sound there, and I've run my mics in comparison to the schoeps, and akgs I mentioned. I've heard the beyers run against the gefells a number of times but always at other events. Heard a bunch of samples of DPAs in nature and at musical events (some of which I was at with mine, some not). The Milabs and MBHOs are suggests within the price range to do some research on, not necessarily an endorsement.

The symphony/orchestral crowd seem to prefer Schoeps and DPAs (just relating what I see, I don't record that genre so take it with a grain of salt). John can comment on that (I think he uses Sennheisers, but I don't have any experience hearing comparisons or running those) and there is a fellow here ; D.Satz who does recording in that area (and uses Schoeps).
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: TNJazz on March 04, 2011, 12:45:38 PM
I use B&K 4011 and Nevaton MK49 in the field and both are highly recommended for the various recording you are looking to do.

At the risk of crossing any boundaries between hobbyist and gear pimp, I sell Nevaton and Milab and I find that both are excellent choices.  If you'd like more information on either feel free to PM me.

I've not used the CK series beyers, but I have owned the predecessors MC930, MC803 and MC703.  All are very nice mics, but can be a little dark sometimes - particularly the 930.

I've owned Schoeps CMC621 and CMC64 and they were wonderful as well for close miking sources (music) but in the end I decided I liked the Nevatons better for all around use.

I've owned a lot of AKG mics in the past (451, 460, 414, etc) and I am not a fan.  They have a sizzle to my ears that I just don't care for (even the JWmod versions).

A number of recordists (especially classical) like the Sennheiser 8040's.  I've never used them myself but I have heard recordings and I really haven't heard any bad things said about them.

So a short list of small diaphragm condenser recommendations (in no particular order) are:

1.  DPA/B&K (4011, 4021, 4022, 4023)
2.  Nevaton MC49
3.  Milab VM44 (Link or Classic)
4.  Schoeps CMC64 (cardioids)
5.  beyerdynamic CK930 (or MC930)
6.  Sennheiser 8040

If you are willing to consider large diaphragm/multipattern mics at all, the list grows substantially...
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: it-goes-to-eleven on March 04, 2011, 02:05:09 PM
6.  Sennheiser 8040

Those Senn's are unique in that they are RF coupled.  That gives them big advantages in regard to humidity resistance, making them far more suitable and resilient for outdoor use than most other mics.  I haven't tried them.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 04, 2011, 02:29:48 PM
HI Guy's
Hey, this is great! Keep them coming.

Thanks, Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: johnw on March 04, 2011, 04:17:35 PM
A $2000 cap puts DPA 4011 or 40xx anything, Schoeps CMC anything, Sennheiser MKH 80xx out of reach.

If you purchased a set of Schoeps mk4 caps used for $8-900 and bought a pair of CMRs for $1100 and were handy at building yourself a battery box you could do that. But that is going to put you right up to and possibly over 2k by the time you figure parts and shipping. A set of PFAs would put you over as well. An Nbox is more expensive than the CMRs and about in line with CMC6 bodies. A used set of matched caps that are still truly matched is unlikely in that price range. Bottom line, I think Schoeps are excluded here.

My suggestion would be a pair of Neumann 140s or 183s or 184s. You could easily get either for under $2000 used. You could even buy a pair of Neumann SKM 183/184 new for under $2000. If you are intent on a matched pair, then I would buy the SKM 183 (omni) or 184 (card ) new since over time even a previously matched pair may not fall into matched specs.

I have owned and used AKG 391s and 393s, AKG 461s and 463s (modified by Jim Williams), Neumann km140s and now have a pair of Schoeps mk41s with an Nbox.

For nature or chamber recording I would think anything past a card would be too directional and I would lean towards an omni. Out of the combination I've owned, I would go with the Neumann or modified AKG 461s. Since you stated you wanted a matched pair and AKG doesn't offer matching, that leaves only the Neumanns. While I haven't used the 184s the company claims they sound identical to the 140s. I also haven't used or heard an omni cap from Neumann so I can't reccomend it.

EDIT: while Microtech Gefell 200s would be over $2k a pair of m300 would be under that, but not sure if they offer matching at a price under $2000. Also don't know anything about MBHO or Josephson c42 although they are generally well regarded.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: page on March 04, 2011, 05:19:13 PM
A $2000 cap puts DPA 4011 or 40xx anything, Schoeps CMC anything, Sennheiser MKH 80xx out of reach.

If you purchased a set of Schoeps mk4 caps used for $8-900 and bought a pair of CMRs for $1100 and were handy at building yourself a battery box you could do that. But that is going to put you right up to and possibly over 2k by the time you figure parts and shipping.

I underestimated the CMR box cost. My bad.

EDIT: while Microtech Gefell 200s would be over $2k a pair of m300 would be under that, but not sure if they offer matching at a price under $2000. Also don't know anything about MBHO or Josephson c42 although they are generally well regarded.

yeah, I found one place that would set a ("new") set of MG200s w/ card caps for just over $2k (like $2050 for the pair) but it was only a limited number and the regular price was a chunk more.  :-\
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 04, 2011, 05:33:13 PM
HI All,
I'm afraid I used the term"matched" wrong. I meant a pair of the same model. You mean a pair that is matched to specification, I think. I'm sure that is better and would result in better imaging. However, I can see why that is more expensive and maybe not available. Sorry about that.

But my misuse of the term just shows you that I am a newbe to this game. I would very much appreciate it if you don't assume anything. For example, you said CMR (whats a CMR?) without any description. Am I supposed to know what you are talking about? Same thing with PFA (whats a CFA and CMC6?). I hope you are not just trying to impress me with your knowledge. Don't worry, I'm impressed.

Whats an Nbox? Whats a CMR box? Whats a MG200?

Are you getting the idea now? I hope so because I'm spending too much time being confused.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: jbou on March 04, 2011, 05:56:21 PM
The Nbox and the CMR setup are for Schoeps MK capsules and let you run the caps without the bodies. I'll let other people give you more specifics. But heres a link to another thread with some pics of these setups so you can get the idea.

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=136697.0
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: johnw on March 04, 2011, 05:58:00 PM
I'm not trying to impress anyone. I am using specific part numbers for the companies I listed. The only exception is PFA since I did not specify the company Naint audio.  A link to the schoeps CMR and PFA are below.

http://www.naiant.com/pfaspecification.html (http://www.naiant.com/pfaspecification.html)
http://www.schoeps.de/en/products/cmr (http://www.schoeps.de/en/products/cmr)

There is no company website for Nbox, but it is a preamplifier custom built by a member here named Nick. You can contact him in the link below.
http://taperssection.com/index.php?action=profile;u=5476 (http://taperssection.com/index.php?action=profile;u=5476)

Schoeps CMC6
http://www.schoeps.de/en/products/categories/mic_amps (http://www.schoeps.de/en/products/categories/mic_amps)

Please don't take this the wrong way but all of these questions are easily answered by using the search box in the top left corner of the screen or even google. In fact the second return after the search "nbox" would answer your question. As for MG200 - Microtech Gefell 200 appears right above in the quoted text.

Good luck with your search for equipment, it can be confusing and maybe frustrating, but you will get plenty of friendly advice here.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 04, 2011, 05:59:51 PM
I don't know US prices, unfortunately.

I do have an MKH 8040 stereoset (cardioids) and also an MKH 8020 stereoset (omnis) which I use for lots of classical stuff indoors and out.  As has been said, these are RF condensers and safe in damp and condensation.  They are also symmetrical capsule mics with very low double-tone distortion.

The Neumann KM 183 and 184 sets are more affordable.

Schoeps are good, but at the top of the price range.

MBHO mics. are exceptionally good for the price - pretty close to Schoeps in quality but they have simpler distribution and are much cheaper (they make the capsules for Soundfield, Brauner and others).
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: OFOTD on March 04, 2011, 06:01:53 PM

But my misuse of the term just shows you that I am a newbe to this game. I would very much appreciate it if you don't assume anything. For example, you said CMR (whats a CMR?) without any description. Am I supposed to know what you are talking about? Same thing with PFA (whats a CFA and CMC6?). I hope you are not just trying to impress me with your knowledge. Don't worry, I'm impressed.

Not sure what you mean by 'don't assume anything' but I take it you don't want us to assume that you're new and are looking to spend money on things you know nothing about yet?

Are you getting the idea now? I hope so because I'm spending too much time being confused.

We're trying to get the idea here but when you disagree with us on things that we all know to be true then patience runs thin.    So as mentioned before do you want us to help you or do you just want us to agree with you?  Because those as of now seem to be two totally different things.

As for what an Nbox is or CMR's or MG200 's those items are basic Taping 101 topics that you should read about before folks continue to give you info on things that you appear to not know anything about.   Go read the Getting Started threads and do some basic searching on this site.   I have no doubt that once you do some of your own investigating instead of asking people to do your work for you that your thought process on your Nagra > C1000's will completely change.   
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: kirk97132 on March 04, 2011, 06:22:53 PM
I agree.  The search function is your friend.  And fwiw before I spent a dime on new 4 track recorder I read through 75 plus pages of posts here, talked to people and did my own research after that.  All of which took WAY more than the 3 days you've been on this site.  I'd suggest you spend the next month reading, absorbing and researching THEN ask some questions but don't look for validation, look for information.   
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 04, 2011, 07:05:07 PM

But my misuse of the term just shows you that I am a newbe to this game. I would very much appreciate it if you don't assume anything. For example, you said CMR (whats a CMR?) without any description. Am I supposed to know what you are talking about? Same thing with PFA (whats a CFA and CMC6?). I hope you are not just trying to impress me with your knowledge. Don't worry, I'm impressed.

Not sure what you mean by 'don't assume anything' but I take it you don't want us to assume that you're new and are looking to spend money on things you know nothing about yet?

Are you getting the idea now? I hope so because I'm spending too much time being confused.

We're trying to get the idea here but when you disagree with us on things that we all know to be true then patience runs thin.    So as mentioned before do you want us to help you or do you just want us to agree with you?  Because those as of now seem to be two totally different things.

As for what an Nbox is or CMR's or MG200 's those items are basic Taping 101 topics that you should read about before folks continue to give you info on things that you appear to not know anything about.   Go read the Getting Started threads and do some basic searching on this site.   I have no doubt that once you do some of your own investigating instead of asking people to do your work for you that your thought process on your Nagra > C1000's will completely change.

HI,
I agree about the research. That's going to be done. But, here we are. You are teaching and I am learning. If you want to teach well, you must accept that I am  beginner. I told you that at the beginning. If you do not want to waste your words ( I hope you won't) then accept this situation as it is. Or, don't post. I'm doing the best I can. I don't need your sh*t.

And I mean don't assume I can interpret words and terms that I am encountering for the first time. You know what I mean but you choose to twist the meaning. Not appreciated.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 04, 2011, 07:22:13 PM
HI All,
And the advantage of using an Nbox is?

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Brian Skalinder on March 04, 2011, 11:49:10 PM
And the advantage of using an Nbox is?

Damnit, I just lost several paragraphs somehow.  Out of frustration, my response now will be more brief, and I won't re-type the answer your above question directly...yet.

Before discussing the relative advantage and disadvantages of specific gear, I think it would be helpful to re-focus on the following topics in the following order:


We've started getting into #4, but without a common understanding of #1-3, and as a result the recommendations might not be appropriate.  For example, if you're absolutely, positively dead-set on getting the Nagra recorder, and have extremely limited funds for mics, then most of the recent gear-specific recommendations are useless as they're way over budget (I think; I'm not entirely sure of the budget).  But if you're open to re-visiting the budget allocation, then some (though likely not all) of the recent recommendations may be appropriate.

Let's get through #1-3 and then I think you'll find far more value in the (hopefully more) appropriate and useful gear recommendations.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: sk-1 on March 05, 2011, 12:02:43 AM
Hi Sparky,

I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that TS doesn't need your sh*t either, and that if you can't accept considered and detailed advice with any degree of humility or gratitude then this is probably all a pointless exercise.

BTW did anyone else see all this coming as soon as audiophile status was mentioned? Nobody mention ABX!

Ben
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: newplanet7 on March 05, 2011, 12:26:27 AM
HI All,
And the advantage of using an Nbox is?

Sparky
It takes the bodies out of the equation but adds another  small box.
This seems to not apply to you since you will probably be running mic~> nagra correct??

I've run or owned AKG c1000's which was discussed already, AKG se300 bodies with the ck91 cards and ck93 hypers,
 AKG c460b~> ck1 cards, ck61 cards, ck3 hypers, ck63 hypers, ck62 omnis.
Schoeps mk21, mk22, mk41, mk4, mk2~> kc5 cables~> cmc6 bodies.
For what you are primarily doing the hypers/supercards (MK41, ck63, ck3) would not be in the bag of tricks.
I love the ck1 cards for the detail and clarity which is why I have stuck with them
Even though  the schoeps would be out of said budget the mk21's and mk2's and or AKG ck62 and ck1's with the 460's would be great.
I really love the omnis for both companies. I used them for music, on stage and a little bit back from the stage.
Every time I taped with them I was pleased from the great detail and scary accurate recreation of the soundstage.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: F.O.Bean on March 05, 2011, 02:07:58 AM

1.  DPA/B&K (4011, 4021, 4022, 4023)
2.  Nevaton MC49
3.  Milab VM44 (Link or Classic)
4.  Schoeps CMC64 (cardioids)
5.  beyerdynamic CK930 (or MC930)
6.  Sennheiser 8040

EVERYONE ALWAYS forgets about MBHO's. And Neumann's as well :) MBHO has more capsule options than every company except Schoeps. And the folks who build MBHO's used to work w/ Dr. Schoeps, and I think they are very similar, but at a HUGE price difference. I would pay DOUBLE for my MBHO's, seriously. But I got a GREAT deal on them.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: F.O.Bean on March 05, 2011, 02:13:17 AM
MBHO mics. are exceptionally good for the price - pretty close to Schoeps in quality but they have simpler distribution and are much cheaper (they make the capsules for Soundfield, Brauner and others).

I am SOOO frickin' glad that someone else regards MBHO's the same way that I do ;D
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: sunjan on March 05, 2011, 03:49:31 AM
Damnit, I just lost several paragraphs somehow.  Out of frustration, my response now will be more brief, and I won't re-type the answer your above question directly...yet.

Hey Brian, you should install Lazarus:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/lazarus-form-recovery/
Saved my a** so many times when posting here.
Sorry for the thread jack, back on topic...
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: ghellquist on March 05, 2011, 04:57:33 AM
Mics for classical music? Well, that it all I do. Tested most mics, all I recommend here.
And seems like 2 mics, straight to stereo. Recording in the open, not stealth then.
I firmly believe in having two sets, using them dependant on rom a nd instruments. Set one I use cardioids in Ortf. Set two omnis spaced to taste, often aroind half a meter.

For Ortf there is a golden standard ( now remember this can be debated and is all about taste ) the Schoeps Mk4 capsule and most often a Cmc6 head amp. This is combined in the best of worlds in the Mstc64. Easy to set up and always useable. The Sennheisers are not bad either, Mkh40 or Mkh8040. There are others in similar class, still talking money here though. You would probably like the Neumann Km184 as well, although often these will benefit from a bit of taming of the high frequencys. Staples in the studio world so you will probably find them used.

For Omni there are several choices, but I have not tried them all. I like the Microtech Gefell M296, but they are very special. Mkh20 or Mkh8020 are definitely useable. And why not the Neumann Km183.

Gunnar
disclaimer: I am farly confident in using all the mics mentioned and owns or has owned all of them with the exception of the Mkh8040, all in recording classical from chamber music to large Symphony Orchestras, like Beethoven 9 or Holst the planets.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 05, 2011, 07:18:45 AM
EVERYONE ALWAYS forgets about MBHO's.

No, I've mentioned MBHO several times.



And Neumann's as well :)

And I mentioned the Neumann options
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 10:35:23 AM
HI All,
Thanks for all the information. As I implied before, the microphone issue is a can of worms. I am accumulating and correlating all this data into a spreadsheet which I will post here, maybe today. I want to wait until the information slows down a little so I won't have to do it over again. I have three monitors going to keep it all straight!

Several things are apparent: there is very little agreement simply based upon what you folks are writing. There is quite a lot of agreement on brands. But, models within the brands are all over the place. Plus, many are suggesting models that are not available through retail outlets. Are they discontinued? Maybe. I'm also pricing all the suggestions. For ease, I'm using B&H prices where I can. But not all brands are available from B&H. For those I am Googling for prices. I'm not finished with that part. I realize that there may be better prices than B&H, but usually B&H is pretty competitive. The differences between B&H and other retailers are relatively small. I am only considering new products at the moment.

Of course, price is only one issue. The most important thing is matching the mic to the need. But this can't be strictly determined from a spec sheet. Only experience can do that especially when you throw taste into the equation. Again, this is very much like hi fi.

Another thing is you all have spent a lot of money on your mics. Thus, you are practicing what you preach. This does not surprise me. But, unless you actually still have all the mics you have suggested, you have traded many times. This means you have been on the learning curve for a long time. You have made mistakes and have corrected them. I don't know how you manage your finances, but unless you have a business, this expense is out of your pocket rather than a tax write-off. I hope you do have a business set up because otherwise your recording activity is for rich men. For me, the cost is out of pocket. My activity is a hobby and not a business. Thus, my cost is a straight expense.

I'd like to clear up some things. I'm not on a strict budget based on what I can afford. No, I am on a budget based upon my plan. I could run out today and buy any of the mics suggested here and I am tempted to do that. Sure, it would hurt a little but I could do it. I just don't want to do it. I would like to be able to base my buying decisions on my personal experiences. I will make mistakes but I would like to minimize them. Mistakes is how we learn. We just try not not make the same mistake twice.

I suspected that the microphone hunt would be very difficult. Again, put yourself in my shoes. I have no way of determining the best mic for what I want. I'm sure at the beginning of your recording careers you did not either. I can select certain features which are published but, as mentioned above, this is not a world of facts but taste plus raw performance. And each of us have different tastes. We also have different physical hearing capabilities. And we have different goals. Thus, we select different mics from someone else, and swear by them. That's not realistic for a third party trying choose such as myself. But, it's the best we can do and I do appreciate all of you trying bring me on board. Your information will be extremely valuable to me when the time comes. Try to understand that I have a plan and I know how I learn. It may not be your way. There is no one way.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Brian Skalinder on March 05, 2011, 11:06:33 AM
Sparky --

You won't achieve agreement from everyone on all recommendations.  There are many reasons we don't and won't all agree on everything.  But there's one quite clear theme: 


I still have no idea if you're willing to consider doing so.  If not, and you're dead-set on the Nagra recorder, with a very limited mic budget, the entire discussion is moot.  If so, specifying a budget -- any budget -- will help narrow down the choices.  While I recognize you could buy any of the expensive mics mentioned, it seems clear from your comments you do have a budget in mind.  Surely, there is some amount of money above which you're not comfortable spending as you enter this hobby.

Finally, you're correct many of us have used a variety of mics in order to gain the personal experience required to refine our preferences.  Obviously, the only way to do so is to actually experience the gear first-hand, and that typically means owning or renting mics.  As you rightly say, it's a process.  And it can get expensive.  FWIW, the best way to minimize cost out of pocket is to buy and sell used gear.  There's far less depreciation that way when one changes gear to try something new in search of the ever elusive "perfect" set of gear.

But ultimately, getting back on track, it all comes down to this:  we can only help if you provide information and answer questions.  Again, please re-visit #1-3 and help us understand the answers to those topics, so we may make appropriate recommendations.  Otherwise, you'll continue to receive recommendations spanning anything and everything, and all you'll end up with is a list of all the gear anyone has ever used and/or liked, which will be so long it won't provide much help.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 11:58:16 AM
HI Brian,
You seem to be one of the more merciful here. I did not ask for this mic discussion. It was not part of the OP and I did not intend it to be. I only mentioned mics to try to give an overview of where I was. I knew that once the discussion moved to mics it would be a free for all; one I did not want.

If you have read this whole thread, the blood has been let over how I am allocating my resources. At this moment, as I have said, I am not willing to spend a small fortune on mics at the very beginning. I have many other things to learn first. The mics time will come. That's it, story over. I think this discussion is moot. But, I still appreciate the information which will be useful both to me and to others who might reference this thread.

My audio experience is vast. I am 69 years old and have into hi fi since 1954 when I built my first tube amp, a Heath kit. Yes, my ears still work well. Since then audio has been my passion. I have run two different hi end hi fi repair shops for a total of 13 years. I specialized in tape recorders. I have been an audio consultant for several high end hi fi stores advising customers on their hi fi and acoustic problems and purchases. When Stereophile magazine was located in Santa Fe, my locality, I knew, and listened with, all their top reviewers. I knew the owner of the magazine (now gone and a former customer of mine) and the Chief Editor (still there). Several were very good friends. We shared our audio passions. I also have a full electronics shop set up at home where I experiment with ideas and modify and design equipment. It's a great shop fully instrumented with Tektronics test equipment.

I have had a long career at a National Laboratory as an electronics design engineer specializing in exotic digital data systems. None of my fellow engineers are into audio in a serious way.

I am a very experienced listener and, I think, a good one. I have a great hi fi system worth more than I want to mention. I have a vinyl record collection over 4500 strong but not nearly as many CD's. I truly do understand the issue of taste and how that drives opinions to the death. There are very few people whose opinions I would trust to the point where I would follow their path, even the most experienced. It's really simple. I think I know more than they do. I certainly know my taste in sound better than they do. I tend strongly to follow my own path because I trust myself.

The same is not true with live recording with which I have little experience. Oh, I have recorded a lot at home but not live. The reason I knew the mic issue would be difficult is because all issues in audio are difficult when it comes to truth; most noteworthy are mics and speakers but the same is true for amplification. You know this is true. Even on this forum, in this thread, I am sceptical. I don't know these people. I don't know their background, their experience, their talent, their ears, their results, or their sonic tastes. I know what they claim but the truth is in the listening. Anyone can claim anything. They are as unknown to me as the microphones they are propounding. It is extremely unlikely I would follow any of them to death. If they are smart, they would respect this view. But, for the most part, that is asking for too much. This does not apply to everybody, thankfully. Given this attitude, I would understand why they would check out. But those who stay with me will give birth to a talented recorder. I hope that is their goal rather than trying to change the basic fabric of my being. If that is their goal, as I think it is, they will fail.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Brian Skalinder on March 05, 2011, 12:27:09 PM
I'm not sure what else to say, Sparky.  Based on your requirements from the original post...

I want a great sounding machine that is still portable enough for field use and at a price I can afford that is also a Nagra.

...it appears the Nagra BB+ is your best recorder option given those very specific requirements.  And it seems you've already decided to use the AKG C1000S.

Personally, I think it's a mistake to spend so much on a recorder and so little on mics (and especially those mics).  I and others have tried several times to re-focus the discussion on an alternative approach which our collective experience suggests is more likely to achieve quality results.  It seems you're not interested in an alternative approach.  Fair enough -- sometimes personal, experiential learning is best.  So...give the Nagra BB+ and C1000S a go and see if you like the results.  And if/when you're ready to upgrade your mics and/or change your recorder -- the former I suspect will be quite soon -- we'll be here to provide input, if you want it.

One final thought:  I'll reiterate my recommendation to buy used gear.  Used gear may depreciate only a few percent, and often not at all as long as it's cared for well.  New gear will depreciate 15-30% the moment you purchase it.  If you're an experiential learner, and it appears you are, you'll end up switching your gear frequently in search of the elusive "perfect sound".  That 15-30% hit on every gear change will add up quickly.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 12:44:03 PM
HI Brian,
I had already bought the C 1000's before I started this thread. Remember, this was not started to discuss mics.

I'm fully aware of the advantages of buying used equipment. I have done it many times with good results. However, one does need to know what they are buying. I have found used equipment to most useful if it was originally top of the line stuff. That stuff tends to age more gracefully than mid line equipment. But, there are some things I am reluctant to buy used. Speakers and phono cartridges are in the category. These are the things that can suffer invisible abuse. I tend to see mics the same way. But maybe I'm wrong about mics. Maybe they are stouter than I think. I do know thay can be abused and mistreated almost as much as mic cables. That makes me a little shy.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: newplanet7 on March 05, 2011, 12:49:17 PM
When I was listing microphones I wasn't thinking of buying new. So, my bad on that.
The AKG 460's aren't made any longer but do pop up here and there used with a little searching.

I would recommend, if you were going to buy used, to feel confident in buying from the
yard sale here on taperssection.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: aaronji on March 05, 2011, 12:56:26 PM
The same is not true with live recording with which I have little experience. Oh, I have recorded a lot at home but not live. The reason I knew the mic issue would be difficult is because all issues in audio are difficult when it comes to truth; most noteworthy are mics and speakers but the same is true for amplification. You know this is true. Even on this forum, in this thread, I am sceptical. I don't know these people. I don't know their background, their experience, their talent, their ears, their results, or their sonic tastes. I know what they claim but the truth is in the listening. Anyone can claim anything. They are as unknown to me as the microphones they are propounding. It is extremely unlikely I would follow any of them to death. If they are smart, they would respect this view. But, for the most part, that is asking for too much. This does not apply to everybody, thankfully. Given this attitude, I would understand why they would check out. But those who stay with me will give birth to a talented recorder. I hope that is their goal rather than trying to change the basic fabric of my being. If that is their goal, as I think it is, they will fail.

Sparky

Geez, dude.  Lighten up.  I seriously doubt anyone is trying to "change the basic fabric of [your] being"...This is what it is: an internet forum.  People are offering their personal preferences; take them or leave them as you will.  Do you really think anyone here runs out and drops a pile of cash on a pair of mics based solely on the anonymous recommendations of a stranger on the web?  It's a valuable resource, in my opinion, and offers the possibility of forming real world connections, but you still need to make these decisions on your own (giving whatever weight you deem necessary to the comments posted here).  Given your skepticism, why bother posting in the first place?

And another thing, I am sure you're a super-genius and a King of Tapers in the making, but we're not idiots either.  A lot of people here have a wealth of recording experience, some on a professional level, and have good advice free for the taking.  Others of us are doctors, lawyers, CPAs, entrepreneurs, professors, executives, scientists, etc...
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 01:24:05 PM
HI aaronji,
I posted here because I had run out of options for Nagra information. Just accept the fact that I will not take things on pure, uniformed faith. Yet, that is exactly what you are asking me to do. One doesn't get married after the first date, right?

And are you smart? Smart enough to let me do this in my own way? Smart enough to realize that you are not going to change my mind? Smart enough to know there is truth in what I am saying? Smart enought to know that I have never, and never would, claimed to be a super genius or "King of the Tapers". That just pisses me off. As for the backgrounds you mentioned, it's beside the point. I'll accept advice when it makes sense to me. If it doesn't I won't. So, it doesn't and neither do you. It's the PHD's that drove this country to the brink of destruction. Don't wave that flag. It has little credibility.

NO, I don't think you are smart enough.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Javier Cinakowski on March 05, 2011, 01:39:10 PM
This thread has potential...
  :gets popcorn, waits for show to start:
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: hoppedup on March 05, 2011, 01:45:33 PM
Snarky, have you considered the Aaton Cantar-X2 paired with a Realistic 33-1065?
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: kirk97132 on March 05, 2011, 02:09:36 PM
HI aaronji,
I posted here because I had run out of options for Nagra information. ...
And are you smart? ....That just pisses me off. As for the backgrounds you mentioned, it's beside the point. I'll accept advice when it makes sense to me. If it doesn't I won't. So, it doesn't and neither do you. It's the PHD's that drove this country to the brink of destruction. Don't wave that flag. It has little credibility.

NO, I don't think you are smart enough.

Sparky
I've followed this thread with the morbid fascination like watching the train wreck happen.  Every so often this same pattern of a newbie coming in then the exact same chain of events, JUST LIKE THIS, happens.
Really....Really...."if it doesn't make sense to me then I won't accept it"  that pretty much sums up this whole topic.  You won't listen to what anyone has to say unless it conform to your own views and/or idea, regardless of their real world experiences.     You won't listen to a PHD, someone who not only decided to educate themselves but took it to the top of their field. Why? Because you blame them for everything bad that has happened to this country.  Yeah that makes a lot of sense.  And, of course you don't need the PHD who is designing your deck and designing your mics  But hey since it don't make sense to you, don't accept it.  You're obtuse, narrow minded and still looking for someone to validate your own views. 5 pages in and it just continues to go round in circles.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 02:27:11 PM
HI kirkd,
You are wrong. And you choose to be wrong. I'll say it again (how many times must I say it?). This was a post concerning Nagra not mics. I am not the one bringing it to a full circle. It's you, and others like you, doing that. I'm not going to simply be a punching bag for your, umm, crap. I will come at you like an eagle with stretched talons.

So beware.

Since the thread has moved into mics like an inevitable natural force, it has been useful. At least I'm learning from it. I think others will too. So, depart from us if you can't make a contribution. I really don't care what you think about me. I just consider the source and then all is right.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: it-goes-to-eleven on March 05, 2011, 02:57:33 PM
HI kirkd,
You are wrong. And you choose to be wrong. I'll say it again (how many times must I say it?). This was a post concerning Nagra not mics. I am not the one bringing it to a full circle. It's you, and others like you, doing that. I'm not going to simply be a punching bag for your, umm, crap. I will come at you like an eagle with stretched talons.

So beware.

(http://emtoast.com/wp-content/uploads/eagle-talons-emtoastcom.jpg)
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: kirk97132 on March 05, 2011, 02:58:35 PM
HI kirkd,
You are wrong. And you choose to be wrong. I'll say it again (how many times must I say it?). This was a post concerning Nagra not mics. I am not the one bringing it to a full circle. It's you, and others like you, doing that. I'm not going to simply be a punching bag for your, umm, crap. I will come at you like an eagle with stretched talons.

So beware.

Since the thread has moved into mics like an inevitable natural force, it has been useful. At least I'm learning from it. I think others will too. So, depart from us if you can't make a contribution. I really don't care what you think about me. I just consider the source and then all is right.

Sparky

Cool now we go to threats....on the interweb behind a computer with an anonymous screen name.   ewwwww I'm scared now. Since YOU chose to keep moving the direction BACK to mics yeah you are pairing a set of very low end  entry level consumer mics with a very high high end professional recorder.  Who wouldn't see the absurdity in that....oh wait you.   But hey I offered to sell you a brand new set of better mics of the same company you placed your faith in at a better deal than you could get anywhere.  And since you brought it up, you are buying the Nagra of recommendations ALONE.  Have you used one?  Have even bother to try to listen to samples of things recorded on a Nagra VS anything else.  Just like marring after the first date.  So how is it that you will listen to those strangers....well because it suits your views.  So your statements continue to contradict yourself, as you have through this whole thread.   Please lets hear some more threats maybe you can make me cry if you try real hard.....
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 03:27:15 PM
HI,
No need. You are already crying. I'm not going to strike back because I don't want to see this thread locked.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: aaronji on March 05, 2011, 03:35:57 PM
And are you smart? Smart enough to let me do this in my own way? Smart enough to realize that you are not going to change my mind? Smart enough to know there is truth in what I am saying? Smart enought to know that I have never, and never would, claimed to be a super genius or "King of the Tapers". That just pisses me off. As for the backgrounds you mentioned, it's beside the point. I'll accept advice when it makes sense to me. If it doesn't I won't. So, it doesn't and neither do you. It's the PHD's that drove this country to the brink of destruction. Don't wave that flag. It has little credibility.

NO, I don't think you are smart enough.

Sparky

Smart enough to know that you, sir, are a pompous ass...
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: newplanet7 on March 05, 2011, 03:40:43 PM
Ok. People have tried to help out here and you are doing nothing but fueling the situation with lies. Proof?? Look at the quotes below.
You asked for the help based on a hypothetical budget and told us to have fun with it. CORRECT???? You need to stop insulting people here
and either lock this thread and move on or carry out what you said in the below quotes. CONTRADICTION IS A BITCH.


HI kirkd,
You are wrong. And you choose to be wrong. I'll say it again (how many times must I say it?). This was a post concerning Nagra not mics. I am not the one bringing it to a full circle. It's you, and others like you, doing that.
Let me pose a hypothetical question to you. Let's say I had a mic budget of up to $2000 for two matched mics.

Given my goals that have been stated many times in this thread, which mics would you suggest for $2000? I'd love to hear you views because at some point in the future I will need your advice and I will use it.
Please, have fun with this. What would you buy?
Thanks, Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 03:52:48 PM
HI newplanet7,
I feel you have tried to be fair. I posed the question about the $2000 budget because the thread was spending most of its words ripping me and the way I choose to spend my money. It wanted to go to mics. So, I decided to make the best of a direction I never intended it to go. Threads tend to have minds of their own. But folks insist on coming back to the blood letting. I have no desire to be a punching bag. So,there is only one thing to do - lock it.

It's too bad because I have almost finished the spreadsheet which I think everyone would find interesting. But, I'm out of here.

Thanks everyone for your information. NO thanks to you who want to villify.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: jlykos on March 05, 2011, 04:15:07 PM
OK, I'll chime in again.  Microtech SMS2000 system with M20 (cardioid) capsules.  I have run Microtech Gefell SMS2000 microphones for 10 years now and have never even thought of changing anything.  They sound better than anything *to me* at *any* price point.  And if you look around, you can find a new pair for $2000.  Before making that purchase, I listened to literally thousands of hours of recordings with dpa, Schoeps, Neumann, and AKG microphones (MBHO, Milab, and Beyerdynamic were not in wide usage at that point).  I may be the only one here, but I really don't like MBHO; they have a certain hardness to their sound signature that is not musical to my ears.  They are flexible and have a wide variety of capsules, however, which is really cool and all, but I don't care if they don't sound very good.

This thread jumped the shark at some point and I don't feel like going back to find out when.  All I can say is to give everybody the patience that they deserve, especially considering that the OP is a new member here and seems to me to still be feeling things out.  If he has his opinions, so be it.  God knows that I have mine.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: newplanet7 on March 05, 2011, 04:23:59 PM
Have a good one karma.
Hope you got some info.
-todd
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 04:25:17 PM
FORUM PREFERENCES
MAN    MODEL   MENTIONS       EACH    SOURCE   COMMENT
Schoeps   MK 21   2   788.00   B&H   Wide Card - Capsule Only
   MK 2   2   765.00   B&H   Omni - Capsule Only
   MK 4   3   698.00   B&H   Card - Capsule Only
   CMR   1   NA   Not Found B&H
   PFA   1   NA   Not Found B&H
   CMC 6   3   1743.00   B&H   Microphone Complete
   MK 41   2   1743.00   B&H   Super-Card - Microphone Complete
   CMC 64   1   1743.00   B&H   Super-Card-Microphone Complete; Same as CMC 6?
   MK 22   2   788.00   B&H   Card – Capsule Only
               
Microtech Gefell   M2000 M200?   1   748.44   Full Compass   Pattern ?
   M20   1   724.71   Full Compass   Card- Capsule
   M300   1      Not Found B&H   
   M296   1         
               
Beyerdynamic   MC910   1   599.00   B&H   Omni
   MC930   2   599.00   B&H   Card
   MC803   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   MC703   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   MC930   1   1149.00   B&H   Card – Matched pair
               
AKG   C 480 b   1   1078.00   B&H   Omni
   CK61   2   1099.00   B&H   Omni
   CK62   1   1078.00   B&H   Omni
   C451   1   579.00   B&H   Card
   C451/ST   0   1299.00   B&H   Card – Matched Piair
   C 460   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   C 414 XLS/ST   0   2199.00   B&H   Selectable-Lg Dia-Matched Pair
   C 414 XLS   1   999.00   B&H   Selectable-Lg Dia
   CK 391   1   539.00   B&H   Card
   393   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   461   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   463   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   C 1000   1   199.00   B&H   Card-Variable
   SE  300B   1   539.00   B&H   Card
   CK 91   1   539.00   B&H   Card
   CK 93   1   478.00   B&H   Hyper Card
   C 60b   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   CK 1   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   CK 3   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
   CK 63   1   1058.00   B&H   Hyper Card
               
Milab   VM-44   2   NA   Not Found B&H   
               
DPA   406X (4061)   1   443.00   B&H   Omni
   Reference Series   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
               
DPA/B&K   4011   1   1949.00   B&H   Card
   4021   1   1765.00   B&H   Card - Compact
   4022   1   1765.00   B&H   Card - Compact
   4023   1   ?   Not Found B&H   
               
B&K   4011   1   NA   Not Found B&H   
               
Nevation   MC49   1   1199.00   Recording Hacks   Card
               
Sennheiser   MKH-8040   3   1199.95   B&H   Card
   MKH  8020   2   1199.95   B&H   Omni
   MKH 8020ST   0   2399.95   B&H   Omni-Matched Pair
   MKH 40   1   1199.95   B&H   Wide Card
   MKH 20   1   1199.95   B&H   Omni
               
Neumann   KMS 140   1   1599.95   B&H   Card
   KM 183   3   899.95   B&H   Omni – Basic Model
   KM 184   2   849.95   B&H   Card
   SKM183   2   1699.95   B&H   Omni – Matched Pair of KM 183
   SKM184   2   199.95   B&H   Box for SKM 183
               
MBHO   No Models   1   NA   Atlas Pro   Several Models
               
Josephson   C42   1   525.00   Mercenary
Audio   Card

I guess I don't know how to post a table. I'm sorry for the screwed up formatting. If you stare at it long enough, it will make sense.

Love to You All,

Sparky
               
               
               
               
               
               

Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: earmonger on March 05, 2011, 04:35:04 PM
The gear you folks are talking about is way beyond my budget.

But looking at your spreadsheet, Karma, I want to point out that the mics you are considering do different things, and since you call yourself a beginner at recording you need to be aware of some basic terms about mic pickup patterns. Maybe you are already.

Card is cardioid: directional. Imagine a heart-shaped (cardio)  pattern going forward with the mic at its point. Supercard is a narrower heart, hypercardioid is an even narrower one.

Omni is omnidirectional. Picks up all around you, like your ears.

Many people who do stealthy concert recording use cards to limit all the audience noise around them. Vocal and instrumental mics for stage use are also cardioid, to focus on the source of the sound.   

You mentioned recording trains. With a cardioid, much less super- or hypercardioid, that train is going to ride into and out of your recording much faster. Ditto for classical music--you really want the reverberation of a good concert hall in the recording, because that makes the music sound more natural. So eliminating cards from your list might give you fewer choices to juggle.
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 04:45:31 PM
HI ear,
If you had read the entire thread (I don't blame you if you have not, it's long) you would see that I am no beginner to audio. I'm just a beginner to live recording. I've been around the basic terminology for decades. What I need is to learn technique.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: John Willett on March 05, 2011, 04:49:22 PM
Going back to the OP and my post #2 at the beginning.

With the budget and the desire for a Nagra, I would look into the new one which Nagra will be showing at NAB next month which I think will be close in price to the ex-demo BB+.  The BB+ is 20-bit / 48kHz - the new unit will be 24-bit / 96kHz with the same mic. pre-amps as the Nagra VI.  Personally I would spend the money there.

I think you will end up being very unhappy with the C1000s - if you want to start inexpensive I would get a pair of Rode NT5 or NT55 as these will always be usable later.

You can then make up your mind at your own speed for a decent pair of mics..  Though if you are doing a lot of outside stuff I would look at a stereoset of MKH 8040 or an MKH 30/40 MS rig as these are RF condensers and work well in the damp.


Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 05:40:35 PM
HI John,
I'm concerned about several things which you do not know, you can't. First, the ultimate price in the US is not firm. Next, when will the new unit actually be for sale through normal outlets. I want to get under way now not months from now. These two things definitely hang me up. I need to make a decision and, to be honest, I'm leaning towards the BB+.

I don't want to get the mic thing going again. I have heard all the bad words about the C 1000 posted here. But how do you account for the good reviews I read? I based my purchase on those reviews and they were very positive. No, they did not claim the C1000 was a world beater but they were positive, in fact very positive; enough so that they did not scare me away. If it was just one review, I could dismiss it as a marketing ploy. But, it was several reviews by authors unassociated with one another. I don't think there were untrue motives involved.

Have you actually used a C1000? Sorry, but I must ask that question.

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: kirk97132 on March 05, 2011, 06:18:39 PM


Have you actually used a C1000? Sorry, but I must ask that question.



Yeah I have constantly over the last 8 years in a variety of recording and sound reinforcement applications because that is what is given to me to use at work.   Most reviews I have ever seen are are only someone's opinion.
Just accept the fact that I will not take things on pure, uniformed faith. Yet, that is exactly what you are asking me to do. One doesn't get married after the first date, right?

Back to the mic topic again aren't we?
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Karma on March 05, 2011, 06:58:06 PM
HI kirkd,
So why don't you get the mic of your dreams? Why undergo the misery?

Sparky
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: F.O.Bean on March 05, 2011, 11:21:54 PM
HI John,
I'm concerned about several things which you do not know, you can't. First, the ultimate price in the US is not firm. Next, when will the new unit actually be for sale through normal outlets. I want to get under way now not months from now. These two things definitely hang me up. I need to make a decision and, to be honest, I'm leaning towards the BB+.

I don't want to get the mic thing going again. I have heard all the bad words about the C 1000 posted here. But how do you account for the good reviews I read? I based my purchase on those reviews and they were very positive. No, they did not claim the C1000 was a world beater but they were positive, in fact very positive; enough so that they did not scare me away. If it was just one review, I could dismiss it as a marketing ploy. But, it was several reviews by authors unassociated with one another. I don't think there were untrue motives involved.

Have you actually used a C1000? Sorry, but I must ask that question.

Sparky

I'm curious, where DID you get all of these rave reviews of the c1000's ???
Title: Re: Nagra BB+
Post by: Brian Skalinder on March 05, 2011, 11:39:43 PM
Locked at OP's request.