Taperssection.com
Gear / Technical Help => Post-Processing, Computer / Streaming / Internet Devices & Related Activity => Topic started by: IceMan on May 06, 2013, 12:09:57 PM
-
Greetings.
I recently got an M10 and ran it for the first time this past weekend.
It now comes to me writing down/keeping track of the lineage. I used to have a D8 and would do something like mic->rolloff->d8 @44.1 khz for example.
The M10 how would I do this for the M10? mic->rolloff->M10 (then mode? Like LPCM 44/24? Is it needed to be that clear etc?
Thank you for your thoughts/opinion.
-
I'd either do mic>etc>M10 (24/48) or, as I do, Mic>etc>M10>24bit/48kHz WAV>processing etc>FLAC
-
I'd either do mic>etc>M10 (24/48) or, as I do, Mic>etc>M10>24bit/48kHz WAV>processing etc>FLAC
Thanks much. I've heard some of your stuff so you'd suggest 24/48? I am new to the device so of course toggling for my needs will come, but always like a good springboard.
Thank you again for a response.
-
I'd either do mic>etc>M10 (24/48) or, as I do, Mic>etc>M10>24bit/48kHz WAV>processing etc>FLAC
Thats what I do. I have a separate transfer line in mine.
One thing is, I state the bitrate where the ADC was:
4021 > V3 > 722 (24/44.1)
4021 > V3 (24/44.1) > 722
Those lines tell me something different. I only see a couple others do that, and it's personal preference.
so you'd suggest 24/48?
Depends on what you want to achieve (what's the final end result, do you have a good resampling algorithm, etc). Most here use either 24/44.1 or 24/48 and resample later if they need a CD Audio compatible output.
-
Depends on what you want to achieve (what's the final end result, do you have a good resampling algorithm, etc). Most here use either 24/44.1 or 24/48 and resample later if they need a CD Audio compatible output.
I definitely like 24/48.
Less and less does anyone need CD, and those that do can resample their own with just about any burning software (nero, itunes, toast).
I agree that the bit depth / sample rate should be listed with the ADC stage. If there's resampling, be sure to list the final output's depth/rate so downloaders will know what they're getting. On a high-def recording, if the metadata doesn't mention resample/ bit reduction, I usually assume that it has not been resampled or reduced.