That's right, bonehead move of the year. I accidentally had my soundcard set @ 48 and Cool Edit set @ 44 for a transfer.....hence, my recording is faster (10% or whatever that 4.1/48 is) than it should be. Oh yeah, and the dats have already been reused so I can't retransfer. Did I also drop samples? Can I stretch the wave to it's correct size? Am I screwed?
Thanks
Brian
I think you can fix this by just changing the WAV file header sample rate. I forget where it is in CEP, maybe in the Edit menu? At any rate, it just changes the header sample rate, it doesn't actually resample.
yes you can do that, just change the sample rate (not convert sample rate) and it will play fine
I had to convert the sample rates from 44 > 48 and then just adjust the sample rate from 48 > 44 to get the length of the wave to match up w/ that of the dat (end of dat is intact). I'm going to have to go through that process 20 something times but atleast it's correct. Thanks for the help!!!
+ T all around, maybe this is archive material for other idiots like me!!!!
;)
Brian
Quote from: bhadella on April 29, 2004, 04:59:50 PM
I had to convert the sample rates from 44 > 48 and then just adjust the sample rate from 48 > 44 to get the length of the wave to match up w/ that of the dat (end of dat is intact).
I'm confused why you needed to convert and then change the sample rate instead of simply changing the sample rate?
44K DAT > Soundcard @ 48K > Cool Edit @ 44K. I ended up w/ a wave that was @ 44K but was fast (chipmunks). Once I upsampled to 48K, I could just convert to 44K and the speed was correct again. I'm an accountant and I'm not sure that I could explain the math....maybe that's why I'm an accountant....fuzzy math.
Thanks again..
Brian
Quote from: bhadella on April 29, 2004, 05:54:54 PM
44K DAT > Soundcard @ 48K > Cool Edit @ 44K. I ended up w/ a wave that was @ 44K but was fast (chipmunks). Once I upsampled to 48K, I could just convert to 44K and the speed was correct again. I'm an accountant and I'm not sure that I could explain the math....maybe that's why I'm an accountant....fuzzy math.
I think just changing the sample rate (not converting) would have accomplished the same thing (but I've never done it so I'm not 100% certain). At any rate, glad you worked it out and have listenable copies of the recordings!
When I simply just adjusted the sample rate to 48K, it shortened the wave evem more making it even faster!!!! 32K was too slow, so I figured resampling and then adjusting might do the trick. It did...