Taperssection.com
Gear / Technical Help => Post-Processing, Computer / Streaming / Internet Devices & Related Activity => Topic started by: bhadella on April 29, 2004, 04:21:52 PM
-
That's right, bonehead move of the year. I accidentally had my soundcard set @ 48 and Cool Edit set @ 44 for a transfer.....hence, my recording is faster (10% or whatever that 4.1/48 is) than it should be. Oh yeah, and the dats have already been reused so I can't retransfer. Did I also drop samples? Can I stretch the wave to it's correct size? Am I screwed?
Thanks
Brian
-
I think you can fix this by just changing the WAV file header sample rate. I forget where it is in CEP, maybe in the Edit menu? At any rate, it just changes the header sample rate, it doesn't actually resample.
-
yes you can do that, just change the sample rate (not convert sample rate) and it will play fine
-
I had to convert the sample rates from 44 > 48 and then just adjust the sample rate from 48 > 44 to get the length of the wave to match up w/ that of the dat (end of dat is intact). I'm going to have to go through that process 20 something times but atleast it's correct. Thanks for the help!!!
+ T all around, maybe this is archive material for other idiots like me!!!!
;)
Brian
-
I had to convert the sample rates from 44 > 48 and then just adjust the sample rate from 48 > 44 to get the length of the wave to match up w/ that of the dat (end of dat is intact).
I'm confused why you needed to convert and then change the sample rate instead of simply changing the sample rate?
-
44K DAT > Soundcard @ 48K > Cool Edit @ 44K. I ended up w/ a wave that was @ 44K but was fast (chipmunks). Once I upsampled to 48K, I could just convert to 44K and the speed was correct again. I'm an accountant and I'm not sure that I could explain the math....maybe that's why I'm an accountant....fuzzy math.
Thanks again..
Brian
-
44K DAT > Soundcard @ 48K > Cool Edit @ 44K. I ended up w/ a wave that was @ 44K but was fast (chipmunks). Once I upsampled to 48K, I could just convert to 44K and the speed was correct again. I'm an accountant and I'm not sure that I could explain the math....maybe that's why I'm an accountant....fuzzy math.
I think just changing the sample rate (not converting) would have accomplished the same thing (but I've never done it so I'm not 100% certain). At any rate, glad you worked it out and have listenable copies of the recordings!
-
When I simply just adjusted the sample rate to 48K, it shortened the wave evem more making it even faster!!!! 32K was too slow, so I figured resampling and then adjusting might do the trick. It did...